Is The Superior Court of Maricopa County in AZ really charging people for the trial video in this case????

UNBELIEVABLE!!!  

I can't believe the NEW LEVEL OF LOW that is said to be going on in Maricopa County, AZ, now.  If it's not one thing, it's another thing, and IT ALL SEEMS SHADY!  First Judge S. Stephens closed her courtroom door to the public and to the media until "The Court of Appeals of AZ" put a stop to it.   Then Judge S. Stephens put stipulations on the one camera that she allowed to videotape the retrial of the sentencing phase, telling the media that they can not air the video until after ja's sentence is handed down to her.  Now, I'm hearing that the media won't be airing the full video.  That they'll be airing just parts of it.  Here's the other catch...!  For anyone that wants to see the full video they'll have to purchase it from the court, get it from someone that gets it, or go the alternative route and watch it on sites/blogs where some people pay a monthly fee to air different things.  

If that ONE court, ONE county, and ONE State gets by with selling copies of the video of this trial, then what is going to stop any other court in any other county and State from doing the same thing?  The way I see it is if this is allowed to go on for one case, well, there should be nothing stopping ALL States from doing the same thing.  IMO, I don't think this is a very good trend that to start.  If AZ can do it then EVERY State should do it.  What's good for the goose is good for the gander.