Saturday, January 24, 2015

About the Omnibus Hearing, ja's sentencing, and the media.

Judge Kreamer already granted ja's motion to be in on the Omnibus Hearing. According to the info that some people have posted via internet, all of the defendants that are in on the Omnibus Hearing will get the same results: Their cases will not be removed as DP cases or they will be removed as being DP cases. My question is: Since ja's name will be in on that Omnibus Hearing, if Kreamer does drops the DP for the defendants, does that mean that his ruling will override that of these jurors if they come back with a sentence of death for ja? Understandably, one court sometimes rules against another court's decision, BUT, the cases that Kreamer will be deciding are cases where the defendants haven't even gone to trial yet. ja has went to trial and was found guilty. In Kreamer's order...it's written that: good cause appearing. (To take the DP off the table for ja.)


I've never heard so much BS in my life such as what goes on in AZ's Judicial System. (Shady) I find it odd that the AZ media isn't trying to get information, find out the law, about this. (Money wouldn't be there for them to do that.) IMO, if Kreamer's decision overrides the jurors, and Kreamer's already decided to drop the DP for the defendants whose names are on the Omnibus Hearing, then SS should dismiss the jury and stop this trial now. (Again, I think it's got to do with money.)




Noted:  
The Court has considered Defendant’s Motion for Joinder and for Omnibus Hearing on Motion to Dismiss Death Penalty. Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion

http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/112014/m6577799.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment