What If Jodi Arias Juror #17 Failed To Disclose Her Connection To Prosecutor? Isn't there other important issues too???

What If Jodi Arias Juror #17 Failed To Disclose Her Connection To Prosecutor?

by Mark Eiglarsh

http://www.floridacriminaldefenselawyerblog.com/2015/03/jodi-arias-juror-17.html


I've been reading that juror #17 is being investigated about her ex-husband and husband having ties with the Prosecuting Attorneys Office in Maricopa County, AZ.  I understand that the odds of juror #17 getting into any kind of trouble relating to the issue of her ex-husband and husband, is most likely NOT going to happen.  Unless there is someone that can read minds, then this juror can lie to Hell and back and there is nothing that anyone can do about it.

I think that the real issue, one where juror #17 can be held accountable for her actions, is her failing to cooperate with the rest of the jurors during deliberations.  From what I heard, juror #17 refused to deliberate on ALL of the evidence and that she only wanted to read ja's journals.  ja's journals was not the only evidence provided to the jurors.  When the other jurors told the judge that juror #17 was not cooperating with them, that she was doing her own thing when they were all supposed to be deliberating together, the judge should have removed juror #17 from the jury.  It doesn't take a mind reader to acknowledge that the jurors brought forth information to the judge about juror #17.  They can and should prosecute juror #17 for being uncooperative.  Judge Stephens needs to be investigated for not taking appropriate legal action.

Juror #17 posted a speech about being against the DP on her online blog.  The jurors said that juror #17 was biased, against the DP.  There is proof of that and not only from the mouths of the jurors.  They can and should prosecute juror #17 for lying about being able to vote for the DP when she is against the DP.  It isn't about her voting for LWOP, it's about her lying and saying that she could vote for the DP when she is anti-DP, and being so would, never vote for the DP regardless of the case.  She committed perjury.

I hope that Maricopa County doesn't address the issue of the ex-husband and her husband and sweep the other issues under the rug.  I hope that someone(s) in AZ or elsewhere doesn't let them sweep those issues under the rug.