It was told by Jason Weber and Elizabeth Schilling that Maria De La Rosa, ja's mitigation specialist, had access to their Paypal email account for awhile when they were receiving funds for ja's "Trust Fund." Is the "Trust Fund" part of this court case? I haven't seen where it's been brought up in this court case, inside of the courtroom, that the "Trust Fund" is part of ja's trials/case nor part of her mitigating factors. Is Maria De La Rosa taking care of ja's finances as a side job, for free, or is she charging "The State of AZ" taxpayers?
What does ja's finances have to do with Maria's job as a mitigation specialist in this case? Since Maria De La Rosa has had, might still have, her hands in ja's financial status, going by statements made by Jason Weber and Elizabeth Schilling, shouldn't she have to give the financial status of all of ja's gains to the court? The taxpayers of Arizona are paying for ja's defense. ja is operating a business out of the Maricopa County Jail. Why aren't her financial gains being reported to the IRS and to the court? Surely, you'd think that any money ja is gaining from her business has to be reported to the IRS and to the court.
Who is the person behind getting ja's artwork authenticated with ja's right thumbprint? There are ONLY three people that have enough access to ja that can get her artwork authenticated aka her right thumbprint put on it. Someone on the DT has to be taking the "extra prints" in/out of the jail that were sold without the right thumbprint on them, to get ja to put her right thumbprint on them. Does the State of Arizona pay for someone on a criminal's defense team to help a criminal run a business out of one of their jail??? Like I said, only three people have enough access to ja to help her run her business from jail. If it's being done as a side job or for free, one would think that this wouldn't be allowed...illegal to say the least. (It's considered contraband.) That is a criminal offense!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment