In closing arguments Thursday, Nurmi said the state should not be allowed to continue going forward with the death penalty because the case is based on testimony that's not true.
That is rich coming from Nurmi, that is representing a known LIAR. The State's case was based on factual evidence that proved that ja planned and murdered TA. Nurmi's defense was based on lies that came from the mouth of his client.
"Let's put an end to this circus," he said Thursday. "Any further proceedings will be based on false evidence," he added.
If ja takes the stand then, kid you not, her testimony alone will be based on nothing more but telling more lies. By allowing JM to finish the "retrial of the sentencing phase," the State's evidence of Murder 1, which was based on Facts, should put ja on death row.
"This case is more about prosecutorial misconduct than it is about evidence," he said.
This case is about ja planning, murdering, and trying to cover her tracks. What isn't relevant is the "porn" BS. ja didn't murder TA because of any "alleged" porn fetish.
Nurmi didn't prove his case, win it, based on the lies told by his client. IMO, just like his client, he is trying to throw other people under the bus and get off topic of the real issue here...that his client planned and murdered an innocent man.
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/mesa/2014/12/11/jodi-arias-computer-porn-hearing-juan-martinez/20274011/
No comments:
Post a Comment