Filed on Dec. 1, 2014 by Juan Martinez.
ja's CLAIMS that her "alleged" witnesses are refusing to testify unless the court proceedings are closed to the public while they are testifying. ja tried to make up her own "legal reasoning" where no law applies to her BS. JM made it pretty clear that ja's attorneys can subpoena her witnesses and that it'll be the DT's own fault if they don't. Also that the jury can't be faulted for not hearing any evidence that the DT doesn't put out there for them to see/hear.
http://karasoncrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/States-Objection-to-Motion-to-Reconsider.pdf
ja tried using this same game of manipulation before during the retrial of her sentencing phase when she took the stand. The only differences is that before she implicated herself as being the "uncooperative" witness. Judge SS isn't stupid. She has got to see the game of manipulation that ja has been playing. Judge SS needs to put a stop to ja's and the DT stall tactics and BS reasons that ja and the DT come up with in an attempt to take the DP off of the table.
azfamily.com
Posted on December 16, 2014 at 11:27 AM
Updated today at 1:06 PM
The opinion said Arias did not feel she would be "able to fully communicate what she wants to say, communicate her remorse and go through all the mitigating factors and get them out there in front of the jury with the public here," her lawyers told the judge.
The judge suggested that the public and press be moved to an overflow room, and Arias objected to that alternative despite the judge expressing concern that she was being manipulative. She objected "because of the pressure that I would feel because of these threats," according to the opinion.
Read more: http://www.azfamily.com/news/Court-reveals-why-Arias-wanted-testimony-private-285980661.html#ixzz3M69enS00
No comments:
Post a Comment