ja trial judge gets humble pie for Thanksgiving, ja gets soy casserole.

http://www.examiner.com/article/jodi-arias-trial-judge-gets-humble-pie-for-thanksgiving-jodi-gets-soy-casserole

Update on information: Court of Appeals puts the slap down on Judge Stephens

The year is wrong. "October 30, 2013" should be "October 30, 2014." It's a typo.  

Smh...I was excited about them possibly having to hand over everything that went on during all of those secret hearings and meetings that the public and the media weren't allowed to be inside the courtroom for.  



http://www.courtchatter.com/2014/11/court-of-appeals-puts-slap-down-on.html?m=1

Did Hodi remove the carpet/rug in front of TA's shower so that he'd have a more difficult time escaping her plan???

Both pictures are of inside TA's bathroom. In the first picture it shows a piece of carpet/rug in front of his shower door.  In the second picture, when his body was found inside the shower, the carpet/rug is not there. Where did it go???  Did Hodi preplan it so extremely that she took the piece of carpet/rug, that might've prevented TA from sliding across the bathroom floor when he got out of the shower??? 

Did Hodi use that small piece of carpet/rug to wrap the murder weapons in before she left his home?  

It was talked about that there was a "water mark" on a box inside of TA's bathroom closet.  It'd make more sense that Hodi removed the carpet/rug before the attack started...to slow her prey (TA).  Had said carpet/rug been there before and while the attack was going on, the carpet/rug would've soaked up some of the water.  

Either or, the carpet/rug isn't present in later pics of TA's bathroom.  Anyone that has a shower knows that most people put a rug/carpet outside of their shower door when they have a tile floor inside of their bathroom. (TA did have a piece of carpet/rug outside of his shower door, as shown in pic #1.)  

Trial Talk Live - Pieces of the Chris Hughes Interview about Travis Alexander and Jodi Arias

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJlKxjYb3pA#t=108

Court of Appeals orders Arias media shutout be reversed.

An Arizona Court of Appeals ruling filed Wednesday overrules the decision by the judge presiding over the Jodi Arias trial to clear the courtroom late last month and should lead to the release of transcripts identifying the secret witness who insisted on a closed courtoom and revealing the witness' testimony.


^^^I've been saying the same thing....JSS should have to release everything about the "secret witness" including the trial's transcripts when the courtroom doors were closed to the public and to the media...asap!   


http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/mesa/2014/11/26/appeals-court-jodi-arias-media-shut-out-reversed/19546851/

And the mystery witness was ... Jodi Arias

http://www.azcentral.com/story/laurieroberts/2014/11/26/jodi-arias-is-mystery-witness-court-says/19551323/

Jodi Arias retrial will last until at least January

http://www.azfamily.com/home/Jodi-Arias-trial-will-last-until-January-283778511.html

Jodi Arias' lawyers try to portray Arias as victim

http://www.azfamily.com/news/jodi-arias/Jodi-Arias-lawyers-try-to-portray-Arias-as-victim-283912271.html

Jodi Arias stalking evidence emerges, tweets "No good deed goes unpunished"

http://www.examiner.com/article/jodi-arias-stalking-evidence-emerges-tweets-no-good-deed-goes-unpunished

Jodi Arias--Trial for the murder of Travis Alexander #23 on Reality Chatter.

For updates this is also a good one to follow.  There are so many to follow.  :)   




http://www.realitychatter.com/t4591p400-jodi-arias-trial-for-the-murder-of-travis-alexander-23#241761

Jodi Arias: Day 14 - "A Juror's Perspective" Paul Sanders is following the JA case.

http://www.courtchatter.com/2014/11/jodi-arias-day-14-jurors-perspective.html?m=1

"The 13th juror" on the Marissa DeVault case, Paul Sanders, wrote a book called "Brain Damage."

BRAIN DAMAGE: A Juror's Tale Paperback – September 11, 2014

by Paul Sanders (Author), Nick Erickson (Cover Design)

http://www.amazon.com/BRAIN-DAMAGE-Jurors-Paul-Sanders/dp/1502390159/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1417039530&sr=1-1&keywords=brain+damage+a+jurors+tale



It looks like I'll be adding to my book collection.  I followed the Marissa DeVault case too.  :)  

I'm sure that this will be a great read!  

Marissa DeVault's case on IDTV. Marisa DeVault and Jodi Arias met while Marissa was in jail with Jodi...and they became friends.

Marissa DeVault case on IDTV.



Rumor has it that Marissa DeVault and Jodi Arias became friends while Marissa DeVault was an inmate in jail before Marissa DeVault was moved to prison.  

Marissa DeVault is better known as "The Hammer Murderer" in "The Hammer Killing Case."  




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CngThrranC4

Court of Appeals ruling heavily implies that JA was the "secret" witness.

@ericksonvision: The Court of Appeals ruling also heavily implies that, yes, #JodiArias was the "secret" witness we weren't allowed to see.


Since JSS's order to close the courtroom doors during the "secret witness's testimony" to the public and to the media was overturned by The Three Panel Judges of AZ, IMO, all of the information about that should be made public asap.  No part of this trial should be kept from the public or from the media.  




http://ktar.com/22/1786591/Court-Media-public-allowed-to-hear-witness-in-Jodi-Arias-case

Psychologist testifies in court...and more.

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/mesa/2014/11/24/jodi-arias-sentencing-trial-martinez-child-porn/70065294/

Prosecution hammers Jodi Arias' expert in penalty trial

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/mesa/2014/11/24/jodi-arias-sentencing-trial-martinez-child-porn/70065294/

Jodi Arias Trial - Day 22 - Part 2

Hodi was caught in numerous lies during the first trial and still hasn't stopped telling lies.

Hodi admitted to her "thinking" that her Ex-boyfriend, TA, owed her an explanation after she came to his home uninvited, looking into his window (spying on him), and sees him with a woman in his home.  Hodi and TA were not boyfriend/girlfriend or dating each other "exclusively" at anytime after they broke up.  (That is known by messages between the two, and TA and Hodi, both, dating other people after their break up.)  

Nowhere in any of Hodi's journals, her own words, did she ever even "imply" that TA had ever physically hurt her in any way.  Hodi's journal was "private."  Her own mother talked about just how "private" of a person that Hodi is.  She didn't allow anyone to read it.  If physical abuse would have occurred at anytime Hodi wouldn't have left "abuse" out of her private writings where she wrote details of daily events in it.   There was no physical abuse that took place on TA's part.  

She lied about the date that her "finger" got broken.  It was broken on the day that she murdered TA.  Whether TA broke Hodi's finger or not while he was trying to defend himself against her, we don't know, because Hodi won't tell the truth about much of anything.  Hodi might've broken her finger while she was murdering TA or while she was "stuffing" his body into the small shower inside of his home.   We do know that TA didn't hit Hodi on the day that she murdered him because when she showed up at Ryan Burns home the ONLY marks on her were "cuts" on her hand where the knife kept slipping as she was murdering TA.  You'd think that if TA were physically abusive towards Hodi, that on the night that she murdered him, that TA would have bruised her while he tried to fight her off from murdering him.  The truth is that TA wasn't physically abusive towards Hodi and when it was his own life that was being threatened(eventually taken by her), TA didn't strike her even then.  Some men won't hit a woman even when it's their life at risk.  IMO, TA was that kind of man. 

Hodi admits in this video, a part of the trial, that when TA got upset and "left the situation" that she followed him.  Instead of her trying to defuse a situation, TA leaving a room to get away from her, Hodi followed TA.  Again, instead of TA hitting Hodi, she stated that he "banged his head on the wall."  AGAIN, Hodi proves that TA didn't lay his hands on her when angry at her.   


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHEeMX-Fv1Q

Jodi Ann Arias IS a PED by definition!

It was Jodi Arias, herself, using her own sick and twisted sexual fantasies about children, that wrote the PED letters that she tried to convince people that TA wrote.  He DIDN'T write them.  I want to make it clear that TA was NOT a PED.  Jodi Arias is a PED by definition because of the letters that SHE wrote that involved sexual relations between children and an adult.  (Only, she was the adult in the sexual fantasies that she wrote about concerning the PED letters.)


I hope that the convicted murderer and the "self-proclaimed" PED that she is, gets the DP.  

Written by Paul A. Sanders, Jr. - The 13th Juror MD @The13thJurorMD (Twitter)....

*Except Below Written by Paul A. Sanders, Jr. - The 13th Juror MD @The13thJurorMD (Twitter)....

Then Juan Martinez took us into the creepiness and foreshadowing of the terrible event. He took the Jury on a journey to Travis Alexander's backyard. It was clean and crisp. It brought the psychology of all of it home. It was not the knowledge that Dr. Fonseca may have carried with her 35 years of experience. It was the psychology of what was in Arias' head based, in part, on her prior boyfriend's treatment, in the earlier testimony.

Dr. Fonseca feebly attempted to qualify Arias' behavior. "Well, she saw two people making out but didn't know who they were. She went there to pick up something. She might have seen something." It's too late for Dr. Fonseca.

"Arias had to stand there and look in his back patio window," Juan states. "They were kissing and her brassiere was off. She was peeping right?"

"I don't know if you would call it that," she answers hesitantly.

"Didn't she know the key code to the garage?"

"Yes."

"Why didn't she use the garage, Ma'am? Why didn't she use the door?"

Dr. Fonseca is suddenly at a loss for words. The words of yesterday were stolen away from her. "I don't know how she could have gotten in. That's not..."

"She didn't ring the doorbell, did she?" Juan Martinez asks pointedly.

"No, I don't know."

"She was in the backyard, right?"

"She went around the side," Dr. Fonseca daftly evades.

Juan wouldn't let go. "She intentionally went in the backyard, didn't she?"

"Maybe."

"That's not suffering in silence. Is it, Ma'am?" he asked, slamming the door.

Dr. Fonseca admits, "It is some intrusiveness."

Juan finished the dismantling of Dr. Fonseca throughout the rest of the morning and into the latter part of the afternoon. "We are not talking about Travis Alexander," he said to her at one point. "We are talking about that person over there, Jodi Arias!" he says pointing to the defendant.

"We are finished with this witness," he says as he walks back to the Prosecution table.

The 13th Juror's on the Marissa DeVault's case perspective on the JA case "Twitter."

https://twitter.com/The13thJurorMD

Jodi looking in the direction of the Alexanders, as she's done numerous times during her trials.

For someone that says she can't stand to look at the Alexanders because they all look alike and that they remind her of Travis....The "IT" sure does look over her shoulder at them a lot during her numerous trials.  

13th Juror in the Marissa DeVault case words:

The Jodi Arias Death Penalty Retrial (Sentencing): Day 13 - "A Juror's Perspective".

The Courtroom is seated as soon as the Jury sits down. It is quiet. I look to my left and see only eight or nine reporters present. Normally, the media seating is very full. I took that as a bad sign after seeing Dr. Fonseca walk past me. It was a sign that she would be on the stand most of the day. There was no camera on the left side, it's telephoto lens normally jutting outward.

Juan Martinez was dressed in a dark gray suit with a light blue shirt complimented with a gray patterned tie. His hair was perfect. He looked focused. Expectations were high after his pursuit of Dr. Fonseca at the close of Day 12. 

He walked over to his table and looked at his legal pad, waiting a moment for Dr. Fonseca to get settled. She always looked over to the Jury as if they were good friends. She nodded her head at them and straightened her clothes. She looked ready to tackle this Prosecutor named Mr. Martinez.

Juan walks in short steps back and forth as he questions her. He does not look at the Jury but does face toward them at times. He paces four feet forward and then four feet back. Sometimes, his hands are in his pockets, his suit coat folds resting over his wrists. He looks to the ground a lot. Other times, he crosses his arms across his chest as he asks questions. Sometimes, while he is waiting for an answer, he rests his chin in the crook of his hand. His brow is slightly furled in intensity.

He speaks clearly and succinctly. His questioning is pointed and directional. He does not show empathy for anyone he questions. Even his own witnesses are not spared empathy. He is sharp and quick witted. His questions are a foundation to a piercing question. He knows the answers to the questions he asks. He is direct. He goes after the truth. He always gets the answer he expects. He never goes down a dark hallway into unknown territory and always goes up a lighted stairwell toward the sunlight of information. 

He is like watching a great tennis player as he serves the ball.

He imperceptibly takes a breath, looks at his target and swings with his eyes in the distance at where the ball will land. The snap of the ball on the racket is much like when he fires a question. It is crisp, clean and directional.

Dr. Fonseca reminded me of someone on the stand today and I couldn't put my finger on who it was.

"You were able to review all the documents in this case?" Juan Martinez asks her.

"I reviewed voluminous amounts of information," she answers. "I saw video tapes, read documents and studied...."

Juan cut her off. "You went on the internet? Am I correct?"

"Well," she said looking at the Jury instead of him. "In my line of work, you have to consider a lot of information. Now what I found..."

"Yes or no!" Juan barked.

"Well, yes," she answered.

"You reviewed some photographs?"

"Yes."

"You also reviewed testimony of witnesses who have testified?"

"Objection," Kirk Nurmi interrupts.

It was the first of many sidebars all day long. Juan would ask a question. There would be a sidebar and the cycle would continue through almost all the ensuing questions. 

"Do you remember when you last testified in Court?" Juan Martinez asks her.

"I really can't respond to that, Mr. Martinez," she answers. She lets the "r" in Martinez roll from her tongue as if to emphasize a Latin influence,a showing respect. She always rolls the "r" to the point where it almost sounds condescending.

She continues while looking at the Jury. "I find that it would be a mis-characterization of what I might say or have said. It is...."

"So, you don't remember when you last testified," Juan remarks as he goes to the Prosecution table and pulls out a document. "Let's listen to what you said."

"Objection!" Nurmi says. 

Back to the sidebar, sometimes called a bench conference. White noise plays over our heads so that we can't hear what is being discussed.

"You did see an interview with the Defendant, did you not?" Juan continues after the break.

Dr. Fonseca curls her brow in thought. The Court waits while she thinks about it. "I think I might have seen two interviews from 2009...."

"You seem to be having problems with your memory," Juan points out.

"Your questions are unclear, Mr. Martinez." She rolls the "r" again.

"I can't be expected to remember everything," she answers. "There were thirty one boxes of evidence. I believe I went through thirty of the boxes. There were the interviews and, at least, twenty to thirty CD's. It's difficult for anyone to remember exact dates. I can give months or dates, more or less, but I can't be accountable to every date and time,"

Juan would let her do that at times. She would ramble on and on about things that had nothing to do with the question. I think he did this to show that if he didn't force an answer, she would ramble on forever. I felt that it drove him crazy to listen to her misdirection and mumblings.

"Would it be important to know when their relationship started? The relationship between the defendant and Travis Alexander?"

"Can you repeat the question, Mr. Martinez?

Juan moved on. "Do you think dates on documents are important?" he asks her.

""Well, Mr. Martinez, that misrepresents my response. You have to understand that the documents were voluminous," she responds looking toward the Jury.

"Are you saying you can't remember if a document is at the beginning or end of month?"

"No, I really can't."

Juan looks at her and crosses his arms on his chest. He has stopped pacing. "Didn't you testify to dates and times on documents?"

Dr. Fonseca goes into a litany of nothingness. They are thoughts spoken aloud that have no end. The Jury looks at her but no one is taking notes. Even the second Juror down is not taking notes and she always can be seen buried in her legal pad, pen scribbling.

"Your research experience is mostly of Juveniles, is it not?" Juan asks.

"No, Mr. Martinez. It is of all ages". The kernel of my research has a substantive base of juveniles but I research all aspects of sexual deviancy and its relevancy in certain situations. There are times when one must take this knowledge and work toward an identifiable goal..."

Juan paces back and forth while she says nothing.

Judge Stevens looks on in rapt interest.

I am in my seat taking notes but there are no notes to be taken on what she says because it is not only subjective, it has no substance. They are meaningless words and answers to questions never asked. I am getting frustrated and I can bet the Jury is doing all they can do not to show an expression.

"You created a risk assessment tool, did you not? You created MEGA?" Juan asks.

"Um, I don't want to go down slime highway," she answers as if Juan had asked some horrific and sleazy question.

Juan shows no emotion despite the answer she gave. He is going in a direction. "Isn't MEGA an acronym for a very long term?"

"It's complicated," she answers. "It stands for Multiplex Empirically Guided Assessment. I just stick with the term MEGA because I find that people can understand it and I don't need to write it all the time because there is a kernel of reasoning that supports using other terminology."

Juan has a look in his eye as if he is wondering when she will complete her thought and hoping it will be sometime before lunch. "Your assessment involves juveniles from the age of 4 - 19?"

"Yes," she answers.

"But Arias and Travis were not of that age, were they? Isn't that assessment your specialty?"

"I wouldn't use that tool," the Doctor answers smartly.

For awhile, we went down "slime alley". There were pictures of Travis on the screen at one point. Juan asked her how she knew the said pictures were actually of Travis' anatomy. She didn't have a response worth taking note. At another point, we read the texts between Travis and Arias pointing to the one where Jodi wanted to be a little girl for him. We got to listen to Arias reach orgasm on a tape. We read more dirty emails.

Dr. Fonseca at one point said that people might find these things as distasteful but collectively, it would not mean the same thing. I scratched my head while writing it down. 

"You are here to give your professional Psychological opinion, is that correct?" Juan asked.

"Well, I'm not licensed to do that in this state," she answers carefully. "I have limitations to what I can..."

"But didn't you give an opinion on what you thought was going on between Arias and Travis?" he asks.

"I've answered the question," she says.

"So you are not going to answer?"

Sidebar. Dirty Jodi Arias text message. Sidebar. Dirty picture on the screen. Sidebar. Another question. Sidebar. Banter. Rambling. Sidebar.

Still, Dr. Fonseca has managed to say nothing the length of the day. She was like a caged animal going in circles while Juan Martinez toyed with her. He would poke at the cage and she would go in another circle in her cage. 

Juan attacked and she deflected. 

Every time she said "Martinez" with the roll of the "r", it got on my nerves. I watched the Jury the whole day and by early afternoon, no one was taking any notes. Juan's questions destroyed her credibility. Her fact finding didn't exist. Her memory was wishy-washy. She would show anger and contempt by responding with such statements as "I couldn't be expected to know everything."

It was interesting that she could remember all the details of the Mormon Church when she had been a witness with Kirk Nurmi only days before. It was odd that she thought nothing of sequencing and the importance of dates such as the fact that behavior of Travis came out long after he had been murdered. It was bizarre that suddenly nothing had anything to do with the dynamic of their relationship.

Dr. Fonseca was combative and hostile throughout the day. She had memory problems. She couldn't understand what Juan Martinez was driving at. She looked at the Jury as if to receive empathy for her position but only saw stoic faces in return.

Juan Martinez continued his tirade the whole of the day. He never let up. He never showed sympathy and he never apologized. He attacked like a shark coming out of water.

Her opinions laid on the floor bleeding and squirming.

The Jury saw all of this. I know they tired of it deep in the afternoon as I saw Juror's rubbing their eyes. Another Juror straightened a crook in his neck. One reached over and got a glass of water from in front of her. Others had their heads facing the witness but their stares were blank. I saw a couple them take sneaky looks toward the clock that is behind us.

There is one thing in Arizona that is different from many states. The Jury is allowed to ask questions via a Juror questionnaire form. They complete the form and it is passed to the empty black mesh basket that is available for them.

I was recently on the DeVault Hammer Killing murder case as a Juror for the first half of this year. We used that box almost everyday. Some questions were asked by the Court, others were disregarded. We filled the box when certain Psychologists were on the stand.

It is a bad sign for the defense that the Jury has not asked Dr. Fonseca one question. 

The box lays empty everyday at the end of her testimony because they have already made up their mind about this witness. She virtually impeached herself with every nonsensical answer that she bantered at Juan Martinez.

We wrapped up for the day as Dr. Fonseca sat reading a document for fifteen minutes in open court. She read it to herself and we all watched and waited. Scant coughs could be heard about the courtroom. It was almost comforting because nobody wanted to hear any more from her.

Judge Stevens looked at her and waited.

At 4:30, Judge Stevens called it a day. 

On the way home, I was trying to think of who Dr. Fonseca reminded me of...Of course, I thought, she reminded me of when Jodi Arias got on the stand to defend herself in the first trial...

In either case, not one bit of their testimony helped the defense at all.

Justice 4 Travis Alexander
Feel free to share, like and comment!

Paul A. Sanders, Jr.
The 13th Juror MD @The13thJurorMD (Twitter)

Gold Patrol Update: Sexpert Cross

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksHg2D1fbRU&feature=youtu.be

Juan got the DT expert to admit Travis was no pedophile.

Juan got the DT expert to admit Travis was no pedophile.

Who is the ONE that wrote the PED letters?  JA did!  JA wrote the PED fantasies letters using her OWN words.  BY definition...that makes JA a PED right?  That's exactly what she wanted everyone to perceive TA as being, when, LOOK who it's REALLY been all along>>>Jodi Ann Arias...IN HER OWN WORDS when she wrote the PED letters.  BY DEFINITION, writing that filth, makes JA a PED!!!    

ja in jailhouse clothing on Friday.

Photo credit:   PHOTO TAKEN BY TOM TINGLE ON FRIDAY

Nurmi is whining because ja had to wear her jailhouse clothing on Friday???  Nurmi, when the jury isn't present, she doesn't have a legal Right to wear street clothes.  When the jury is present, she has a legal Right to wear street clothes, but it isn't up to "The Maricopa County Jail" or the court system to furnish her street clothing.  If you don't want the convicted murderer seen in jailhouse clothing, furnish her with street clothing!  

Jodi Arias & Son of Sam laws

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7PSji-4HJk


^^^Apparently, by the looks of this video, said "maker of this video" doesn't realize that ja has been found guilty of First Degree Murder.  The Son of Sam Law pertains to criminals found "Guilty"...  ja hasn't been sentenced but the "guilty" verdict remains as is.  

Was Jodi Arias into child pornography? A Ped?

Jodi shouldn't point a finger when there are three of her own pointing right back at her.  She's been lying/claiming that TA was into child pornography but there's been no proof of that.  There is proof that Hodi destroyed her own laptop, faked Ped letters, and tried to fake a picture of a nude male's bottom parts.  Was the male a minor or an adult in that picture she lied claiming that it was of TA?  We KNOW that Hodi wrote the PED letters...was that her fantasy?  Or another "secret lifestyle" she led?  

George Barwood's BS!

This "idiot," and I use that term to the MAX when pertaining to what this idiot has written about this case in his groups and in his long rambling posts about this case, doesn't know what he is talking about.

It DOES NOT MATTER IN THIS CASE if TA had a billion porn hits on his PC or not.  People need to look at the evidence in this case.  Hodi didn't plan and murder TA due to him being into pornographic material or not.  IMO, Porn of any kind would NOT have been the evidence that would have been crucial to have had the first jury let Hodi walk away from a lessor charge than First Degree Murder, as the defense is trying to claim in their constant rants of accusing JM of misconduct.

  Hodi was into porn herself!  (When the $kank is pointing her finger at TA, there are three more of her own fingers pointing right back at her.)  Hodi lied about the "porn pic" of the male's lower part being TA's.  Does anyone know whether or not that porn picture belonged to a male MINOR?  It wasn't the lower part of TA.  Is it JA, herself, that is not only into "porn" but might also be portraying her own fetish of child pornography onto TA?  TA wasn't the one that destroyed his PC.  JA destroyed hers.  A lot of us have seen and heard the evidence about HER!  That evidence is backed with FACTS, not lies or "allegations."   

JM handed over the HD to the defense team when they asked for it years ago.  It was handed over again.  Twice, and from what I read, as Hodi was "allegedly" representing herself both times.  Going by what I've read, it doesn't look like neither of Hodi's defense teams, before and now, took precautions to preserve the HD so that the State could examine it properly at any date.  


TA stated that Hodi hacked into his PC.  We know that she sneaked into his home, had access to his PC, when he wasn't even at home.  Jodi had ample opportunity of putting porn on that HD, numerous times!  I find it "shady" that no porn was stated to have been found on TA's PC prior to his meeting Hodi and her welcoming herself into his home, his PC, his private business, at any given time that she wanted to.  

Legally Speaking: Drama, drama, drama in Jodi Arias case

http://ktar.com/305/1785703/Legally-Speaking-Drama-drama-drama-in-Jodi-Arias-case

List of Order to Seal Documents dating back to 6/20/2013

Information by:  Edie Morse

11/12/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001)
11/3/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/31/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/28/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/20/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/17/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001)
10/16/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/16/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/14/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/10/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/8/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/8/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/8/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/1/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/1/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/1/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/1/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/29/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/29/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/26/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/26/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/22/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/22/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/22/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/17/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/17/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/17/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/17/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/17/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/16/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/10/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/3/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/3/2014 SDD - Notice: Sealed Document - Party (001) 
8/22/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
8/21/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
8/19/2014 SDD - Notice: Sealed Document - Party (001) 
8/13/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
8/13/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
8/13/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
8/11/2014 SDD - Notice: Sealed Document - Party (001) 
8/4/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
8/4/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
8/4/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
8/1/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/31/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/30/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/30/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/29/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/15/2014 SDD - Notice: Sealed Document - Party (001) 
7/8/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/8/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/8/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/8/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
6/30/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
6/23/2014 SDD - Notice: Sealed Document - Party (001) 
6/20/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
6/13/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
6/13/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
6/5/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
5/21/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
5/21/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
5/19/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
5/19/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
5/8/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
5/5/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
4/14/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
4/14/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
4/9/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001)
3/20/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
2/27/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
2/21/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
2/21/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
2/19/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
2/11/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
2/3/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
1/13/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
1/3/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/26/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/26/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/26/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/26/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/26/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/26/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/26/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/26/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/26/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/26/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/17/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/13/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/13/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/6/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
12/6/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
11/27/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
11/27/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
11/26/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
11/19/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
11/14/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
11/6/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/31/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001)
10/24/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
10/4/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/27/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/27/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/27/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/19/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/19/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/12/2013 SDD - Notice: Sealed Document - Party (001) 
9/12/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
9/11/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
8/27/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/30/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/30/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/16/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/3/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/3/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/3/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/2/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/2/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
7/1/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
6/21/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001)
6/20/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 
6/20/2013 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001)