Wednesday, January 7, 2015

Motion to Preclude Witness Posted by: The Trial Diaries :)

The DT knowingly withheld a witness's name from the State.  Then, to top it off, the DT didn't give the State ample time to interview their witnesses.  Talk about misconduct going on in part of the DT.    
    
Neumeister testimony looks like it has been based on "hearsay."  Hearsay or lies?  

What is Judge SS's role inside the courtroom?  From what I'm seeing SS is not doing a thing to stop the misconduct that is going on by the DT.  

Hopefully, when this trial is over with, the whole DT and this judge will be sitting on the unemployment line.  Hopefully, the DT will be disbarred from ever practicing law ever again.  Hopefully, perjury charges will be brought against some of the DT's witnesses.     

     



http://thetrialdiaries.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/motion.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment