About Jodi Arias and her supporters

Sunday, December 14, 2014

JM filed a motion to object to ja's request that the court reconsider its order denying dismissal of the State's notice seeking imposition of the DP.

The motion JM filed to object to ja's request that the court reconsider its order denying dismissal of the State's notice seeking imposition of the death penalty. Filed on Dec. 1, 2014 by Juan Martinez.

ja's witnesses are refusing to testify unless the court proceedings are closed to the public while they are testifying. ja tried to make up her own "legal reasoning" where no law applies to her BS. JM made it pretty clear that ja's attorneys can subpoena her witnesses and that it'll be the DT's own fault if they don't. Also that the jury can't be faulted for not hearing any evidence that the DT doesn't put out there for them to see/hear.

http://karasoncrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/States-Objection-to-Motion-to-Reconsider.pdf

Saturday, December 13, 2014

Victim's sister: Jodi Arias smiles at me in court

Published on Dec 4, 2012

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNaLKqjaTyg

Jodi Arias Voice Mail to KSAZ - FOX 10's Troy Hayden.

Published on May 9, 2013

This is the sound of a calculating psychopath planning her rehearsed verdict reactions and plans. Listen carefully as she talks about what the verdict may be. Keep in mind this voice mail was was recorded on or around May 5 - three days before the verdict. Troy Hayden is the reporter from FOX that got the interview with Arias right after the verdict was read. You can follow Troy's Twitter account here https://twitter.com/troyhaydenfox10

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiePr-Vsn6M&feature=youtu.be

BY: Edie Morse "The Sting"

Arias trial: Mesa police expert admits porn on computer

In closing arguments Thursday, Nurmi said the state should not be allowed to continue going forward with the death penalty because the case is based on testimony that's not true.

That is rich coming from Nurmi, that is representing a known LIAR. The State's case was based on factual evidence that proved that ja planned and murdered TA. Nurmi's defense was based on lies that came from the mouth of his client.

"Let's put an end to this circus," he said Thursday. "Any further proceedings will be based on false evidence," he added.

If ja takes the stand then, kid you not, her testimony alone will be based on nothing more but telling more lies. By allowing JM to finish the "retrial of the sentencing phase," the State's evidence of Murder 1, which was based on Facts, should put ja on death row.

"This case is more about prosecutorial misconduct than it is about evidence," he said.

This case is about ja planning, murdering, and trying to cover her tracks. What isn't relevant is the "porn" BS. ja didn't murder TA because of any "alleged" porn fetish.

Nurmi didn't prove his case, win it, based on the lies told by his client. IMO, just like his client, he is trying to throw other people under the bus and get off topic of the real issue here...that his client planned and murdered an innocent man.

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/mesa/2014/12/11/jodi-arias-computer-porn-hearing-juan-martinez/20274011/

Jodi Arias trial: Testimony delayed again, coincidence or calculated move?

http://www.examiner.com/article/jodi-arias-trial-testimony-delayed-again-coincidence-or-calculated-move

Only three people have enough access to ja to do this with her artwork: Wilmott, Nurmi, and Maria.

It was told by Jason Weber and Elizabeth Schilling that Maria De La Rosa, ja's mitigation specialist, had access to their Paypal email account for awhile when they were receiving funds for ja's "Trust Fund." Is the "Trust Fund" part of this court case? I haven't seen where it's been brought up in this court case, inside of the courtroom, that the "Trust Fund" is part of ja's trials/case nor part of her mitigating factors. Is Maria De La Rosa taking care of ja's finances as a side job, for free, or is she charging "The State of AZ" taxpayers?

What does ja's finances have to do with Maria's job as a mitigation specialist in this case? Since Maria De La Rosa has had, might still have, her hands in ja's financial status, going by statements made by Jason Weber and Elizabeth Schilling, shouldn't she have to give the financial status of all of ja's gains to the court? The taxpayers of Arizona are paying for ja's defense. ja is operating a business out of the Maricopa County Jail. Why aren't her financial gains being reported to the IRS and to the court? Surely, you'd think that any money ja is gaining from her business has to be reported to the IRS and to the court.

Who is the person behind getting ja's artwork authenticated with ja's right thumbprint? There are ONLY three people that have enough access to ja that can get her artwork authenticated aka her right thumbprint put on it. Someone on the DT has to be taking the "extra prints" in/out of the jail that were sold without the right thumbprint on them, to get ja to put her right thumbprint on them. Does the State of Arizona pay for someone on a criminal's defense team to help a criminal run a business out of one of their jail??? Like I said, only three people have enough access to ja to help her run her business from jail. If it's being done as a side job or for free, one would think that this wouldn't be allowed...illegal to say the least. (It's considered contraband.) That is a criminal offense!!!

2. Someone(s) is doing the artwork that is being sold via internet that ja is taking credit for.