Sunday, January 4, 2015

Jodi Arias files new porngate motion, nobody gasps: Did Jodi implicate herself?

Edie Morse The only reason that "Porn-Gate" exists is because JSS is a bloody dope. No other judge, no decent judge would have granted Skank a 2nd Pro Se... for the US Supreme Court has upheld the right of a criminal judge to turn down, without fear of an appeal, a repeated request for Pro Se... and JA already enjoyed Pro Se in August 2011 and changed her mind back then... Why has JSS colluded with JA & Co. to disrupt the trial proceedings? Only the "ex-partiers" know for sure!!!  

... "... Another theory that has been openly speculated is that Jodi planted porn evidence and created the Porngate stall tactic of the century when she was representing herself this summer. In fact, whether she realizes it or not, Jodi Arias has even suggested as much on the very matter on her own Twitter page. Whoever is tweeting on behalf of Jodi Arias may be telling us what really happened to the computer of Travis Alexander during Porngate, as the following tweet from @JodiAnnArias is not being received the way it was intended.

"Has anyone realized TA's pc porn and viruses and States misconduct and tampering wouldn't have been discovered had #jodiarias not been pro per?"

Jodi is trying to suggest that had she not been “smart enough” to self-represent, it may never have been discovered that Evidence #390633 had been tampered with. But that’s not how her tweet is coming off to the public. Instead to many it is sounding like, “Has anybody realized that there would be no issue of tampering and misconduct if Jodi hadn't self-represented herself so she could obtain evidence and possibly tamper with it?”..."... - Excerpt from a FB Pal

JA is not brilliant... she is no Einstein... but she is cunning, manipulative, and smarter than this hapless, incompetent, and corrupt judge, JSS. For this frivolous motion has been used by JA & Co. to hijack the re-trial, in the hopes that Skank does not get her just punishment:-- i.e. the Death Penalty. Judge Sherry Stephens (JSS) is a bloody disgrace... for this final penalty re-trial should have been conducted on July 18th, 2013, the original date set. Instead, JSS conducted illegal & unethical "ex-parte" meetings with Jodi Arias & her DT (JA & Co.) and then granted delay after delay after delay. Over a year-and-a-half later, here we are, with JSS and JA & Co. "gaming the system", because this incompetent & corrupt judge does not want the convicted butcher to get the DP.

Firstly, JA & Co. have fabricated this bogus "porn" & "prosecutorial misconduct" BS in order to dupe a gullible & foolish judge, JSS, who has even admitted to having fallen for the convicted murderer's manipulations, and she is willing to violate the US Constitution & AZ Legal Statutes to coddle her, because JSS wants to remain "in" with the powerful AZ Defense Attorney Lobby and she has developed an unhealthy relationship with JA. Secondly, there is no evidence that Travis Alexander downloaded and/or accessed "porn"-- but, since JA illegally hacked into his computer, she might well have planted viruses & "porn" onto his computer, which he deleted as soon as he found it-- because computer housekeeping, clean-up routines only delete viruses & unwanted files-- ergo, Travis Alexander did not want this crap on his computer; just as he did not want the garbage-scumbag Arias in his life. Thirdly, there is no misconduct when a housekeeping routine deletes viruses... that's outrageous-- and, only a dope-of-an-unfit "judge" would fall for JA & Co.'s frivolous motions.

JSS has wasted AZ taxpayer money and court time in order to pander to a cunning convicted slaughterer and her unethical defense team. JSS has precluded the truth from being told to the jury vis-à-vis the extent of Jodi Arias' lying, viciousness, and the danger that she presents to the public. Jodi Arias has threatened to have Juan Martinez murdered if she gets the DP. She hasn't been successful in having the prosecutor butchered to death, as she has done to Travis Alexander, so as with Travis, she is intent on destroying Juan Martinez's reputation. The world would be better off without Jodi Arias:-- she deserves the DP; and JSS deserves to be impeached from office.



http://www.examiner.com/article/jodi-arias-files-new-porngate-motion-nobody-gasps-did-jodi-implicate-herself




Jodi Arias files new porngate motion, nobody gasps: Did Jodi implicate herself?


Public record sessions in the retrial of the penalty phase of the Jodi Arias trial have been quiet since court adjourned for a holiday break between Dec 19 and Jan. 5. For most sentencing phases of high profile trials that would mean things get quiet so people can take a moment to relax and remember the more important things in life. Granted, most sentencing phases of capital or even death penalty trials rarely last longer than 40 billable hours, either, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. This sentencing phase for Jodi Arias however has been ongoing since September 2014, with defense costs alone almost toppling the $3 million dollar mark. But, Jodi Arias has proven time and again that speedy trials, or quiet holiday breaks aren't the only areas where she veers far off the normal range. The Jodi Arias supporters have been loudly banging their pots over the holiday break, and the defense team has been busy preparing a motion as well.  CBS 5 for Arizona reported on January 3 that the defense team of Jodi Arias has filed yet another motion on New Year’s Eve asking prosecutors to once again turn over more evidence related to the computer of Travis Alexander. The Porngate saga continues, a term coined by Kelly from Really Big Mean Dog School of Law who has been reporting almost daily on the Jodi Arias trial.

Jodi Arias files new porngate motion, nobody gasps: Did Jodi implicate herself?
Jodi Arias files new porngate motion, nobody gasps: Did Jodi implicate herself?
Cvbeswick via Maricopa County Superior Court

To many members of the public, and even more taxpaying citizens of Arizona that are footing the bill for Jodi Arias defense, this latest Porngate motion, is just another stall tactic in an already protracted trial process. It was 2008 when Jodi Arias brutally murdered her lover Travis Alexander. In 2013, a jury convicted her of first degree murder with aggravating factors that made her eligible for the death penalty. 
All that is left to decide for Jodi Arias now is her sentence. But she is doing whatever she can to delay that. One almost can't blame her, since life in prison or execution are the only sentencing options facing this jury.
Now, on the eve of 2015, the defense is saying they still want the prosecutor to hand over evidence regarding the computer of the victim of this convicted killer. For a sentencing phase! Is this stall tactic perhaps another attempt by the Jodi Arias team going to be another baseless one that proves nothing?
Mud slinging at both the murder victim and the prosecution in this case seems to be the favoured approach of the Jodi Arias defense when they lack evidence to support their allegations. We previously reported on Christmas Eve that just after trial broke for the holidays the State filed their own motion refuting Jodi's claims of prosecutorial misconduct. In that motion Juan Martinez essentially said that, as far as the defense allegations are concerned, no evidence means no misconduct, Jodi doesn't have anything to back up her story telling, again.
CBS 5 reports the newest motion to compel from the defense is asking the prosecution to hand over reports from the Mesa Police after they initially investigated the computer of the murder victim Travis Alexander. The computer of Travis Alexander has taken center stage in this sentencing phase as a key strategy to stall and delay from the Jodi Arias defense. They are doing everything they can to get this jury to hear that Travis Alexander watched porn.
This defense thinks that if the jury finds this out they will believe that Jodi Arias was abused and hopefully not vote on the death penalty for Jodi Arias. The defense also thinks that the prosecution is guilty of Brady violations when it comes to evidence handling of this alleged "computer evidence" according to ABC 15 Jan. 2. In this motion to compel, the Jodi Arias defense is alleging that the State has violated evidentiary laws when it comes to the computer of Travis Alexander, also known as Evidence # 390633.
Key portions of this motion can be viewed in the slideshow where the defense asks the court to compel the State to turn over evidence. The motion asserts the prosecution is committing Brady violations by not handing over this evidence. The motion opens with,
“…pursuant to Rule 15.1 Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 667 (1963), Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1 (1986) and the rights due her pursuant to the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Article 2, Sections 4, 10, 15, 23, 24, and 30, of the Arizona Constitution, hereby moves that the prosecutor make available to the defendant any and all forensic reports generated by any member of the Mesa Police Department and/or anyone working on their behalf whose work is related to evidence item #390633 aka Mr. Alexander’s laptop computer.”
The motion addresses the defense’s “awkward moment” in court when the State accused the defense of tampering with the computer. Jodi Arias says in this motion,
“These accusations were made despite the fact that the Mesa Police Department’s own investigators, detectives Smith and Brown, per the testimony of Detective Smith, both concluded that the image of #390633 made on June 11, 2008 and/or that made in December of 2009, contained the same file logs related to pornography that Mr. Neumeister was accused of putting on the computer.”
The defendant then asks that the court compel the State to turn over those reports stating that according to Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 15.1, failure to do so is a Brady violation. The defense is also saying, not only should this evidence be turned over to us, but we believe that sanctions should be applied to those responsible for this grievance, and that Jodi should be freed from jail immediately.
“Given that the State has not yet complied with the automatic disclosure provisions found in Rule 15.1…..thus already violating the rights due Ms. Arias pursuant [ to all of the bozillion amendments we already cited] Ms. Arias would request that any Order to Compel these reports be supported by meaningful sanctions up to and including dismissal of all charges."
The story of the porn files and the computer in question is much simpler than the defense wants the judge to believe. Once there wasn't porn files on the computer of Travis Alexander and then there was and then there wasn't. The prosecution doesn't know how that happened and have testified in 2013 that there was no porn on the computer and they really don't know why all of a sudden there is this issue.
The defense is saying, ‘You deleted evidence. No, we can't prove that. But we think we should be believed on our word alone and we think this means the death penalty should be taken off the table, on our word.’ Now the defense wants Mesa Police to hand over reports that were done almost 7 years ago in their attempts to validate these claims.
But many can't help but wonder what will suddenly happen to those reports if they wind up in the defense's possession. Many people, including the State as this motion concedes, have openly speculated that Jodi has planted any evidence that makes State look bad and Jodi look good. Many trial watchers that have been following this trial believe that one possibility is that Jodi planted the alleged porn evidence during one of the times she was in the home of Travis Alexander before she stabbed him over 25 times, nearly decapitated him, and shot him in the head. 
Another theory that has been openly speculated is that Jodi planted porn evidence and created the Porngate stall tactic of the century when she was representing herself this summer. In fact, whether she realizes it or not, Jodi Arias has even suggested as much on the very matter on her own Twitter page. Whoever is tweeting on behalf of Jodi Arias may be telling us what really happened to the computer of Travis Alexander during Porngate, as the following tweet from @JodiAnnArias is not being received the way it was intended.
"Has anyone realized TA's pc porn and viruses and States misconduct and tampering wouldn't have been discovered had #jodiarias not been pro per?"
Jodi is trying to suggest that had she not been “smart enough” to self-represent, it may never have been discovered that Evidence #390633 had been tampered with. But that’s not how her tweet is coming off to the public. Instead to many it is sounding like, “Has anybody realized that there would be no issue of tampering and misconduct if Jodi hadn't self-represented herself so she could obtain evidence and possibly tamper with it?”
The public wouldn’t be the first to accuse Jodi of planting the Porngate drama. In fact it was Juan Martinez, prosecutor for the State of Arizona, that was the first to accuse the defense of committing those acts. The defense admits this in their very own motion to compel more evidence. It is coming across as a dog with a bone. Now the new defense motion to compel wants the judge to compel Mesa Police to hand over reports that everybody knows the defense likely already reviewed in 2008. It's looking a lot like the, "Okay we know we don't have any evidence so now let's revisit yours and see what we can tear apart with that" technique.
All of this is happening courtesy of the good taxpaying people of Arizona over a matter that the jury hasn't even heard anything about yet, if they ever will. All of these "prosecutorial misconduct" allegations have been occurring in hearing outside of the jury presence. Why? After months, and months, and months, and months, a good legal reason has not been found to show that this Porngate circus is relevant in regards to Jodi's sentencing phase. Unfortunately for Arizona, without this costly matter in play, it is not inconceivable to believe that Jodi would have been sentenced by now and the Jodi Arias show would be over per the original court docket schedule.
When jury selection began in September 2014 jurors were asked to keep their commitment and calendars blocked to December 18, 2014. In one of the evidentiary hearings for Porngate Kirk Nurmi first chair for the defense openly admitted he never expected it to be finished by then. Does this mean Nurmi was planning all along to bill Arizona for delaying and inconveniencing this jury as long as he possibly could?
To many, it looks that way. Especially since these evidentiary hearings have been lacking just that, evidence, and consumed the better portion of November 2014. To what end?
As it stands now, to no end for Jodi Arias. As it stands now, the jury doesn't know anything about Porngate. In other words, as it stands now, as far as this jury and this sentencing phase is concerned, Porngate doesn’t even exist.
To the end game then if this continues, Porngate remains completely irrelevant. Porngate then will be remembered as nothing more than just another series of tales from nobody special but another one of America’s killers who is trying to get away with a really horrific series of crimes, via a really horrific series of lies.
Will Jodi's charges be dismissed under these alleged Brady violations? The judge will need to find that they are indeed Brady violations, which means that it is found this evidence is exculpatory. In other words the judge needs to find that if the 2013 jury heard this evidence, they would have found Jodi to be “not guilty” of first degree murder with aggravated cruelty. 
With death on the line, this is either a desperate last minute attempt to save Jodi's life, or just another eleventh hour delay tactic. Either way, succeeding with this motion is a seriously uphill battle for the defense. The aggravating factors that made Jodi eligible for the death penalty were cruelty.
This means that based on the forensic evidence one jury has already found her to be exceptionally cruel. Computer files or no computer files, that forensic evidence doesn’t change.
In the meantime, the public is reacting to all of these delay tactics. One trial watcher has written an open letter for the Jodi Arias jury to read once this is all said and done. The full letter can be read in the slideshow, and places an emphasis on the one person in this trial the defense rarely mentions unless they are slinging mud. That would be the victim, Travis Alexander. In this letter, @JodiBanArias writes,
"Dear Arias jurors, By the time you read this you will have sentenced convicted murderer Jodi Arias to Death or LWOP (Life Without Parole) or improperly passed it on to Judge Stephens to pass sentence. You will now be aware Arias violently murdered (overkill) her ex-boyfriend largely due to her built up rage as a result of rejections by her ex, with whom she was consumed with and stalked for months…
We hope you were fully aware of the shady defense team’s Defaming Tactics, along with the many lies, all made up over a 6 year time frame. Sadly the murder victim is unable to give his side of the story, the REAL one. Facts amount to Travis Alexander being stalked…..If you DIDN’T fall for the murderer’s many lies and false allegations and gave Jodi Arias the Death Penalty: CONGRATULATIONS. The Alexander family will have got the long awaited justice for their brother they so deserve. From: The World.”
Another member of the public that has been following the trial in the hopes of justice for the victim Travis Alexander has expressed his interpretation of the numerous motions to dismiss that continue to be filed by the defense. During all of these evidentiary hearings, that appeared to many to lack evidence, on the matter of the many Porngate motions a member of the public commented on the Facebook page titled, “The State vs Jodi Arias ~ Travis Alexander murder trial”. This is how a member of that group interprets the frequent Porngate motions filed by the defense.
“Your honor, the convict is guilty as crap, and all us dimwits on the defense team have [bleep] for brains and have royally screwed up. But we're not gonna own that, so we're throwing up boatloads of hooey in the air that we don't have any actual evidence for and ask you to penalize the prosecution for our 24/7 misconduct operation.”
Court will adjourn for the retrial of the sentencing phase of the Jodi Arias trial tomorrow Jan. 5 in Maricopa County Superior Court in Phoenix, Arizona. Defense domestic violence expert Robert Geffner is expected to take the stand to continue testimony where he will try and paint Jodi Arias as an abuse victim. The defense will conclude their direct examination of Dr, Geffner after which prosecutor for the state will cross examine him in a strenuous attempt to discredit everything he says that Jodi alleges about abuse. 
Watch the video here to see last year's trial footage with Juan Martinez going head to head with Domestic violence expert Alyce Laviolette. Thing got so heated Alyce ordered a time out for Juan Martinez. Watch the footage to get a taste of Juan in action and get an idea of what to expect between Juan and Geffner this coming week.

Most striking tweets from Jodi Arias retrial 2014

They apparently left out the "TWEETS" from ja "TWITTER" company that tweets for ja.  smh.............



http://ktar.com/22/1794726/Most-striking-tweets-from-Jodi-Arias-retrial-2014

The Jodi Arias Sentencing Hearing: Can it Get Any Worse?

http://blog.volkovlaw.com/2014/11/the-jodi-arias-sentencing-hearing-can-it-get-any-worse/


Comments:


  1. Completely agree!!
  2. AnGie
    VERY well written and 100% factual article! Thank you! I could not agree more & WISH for her & superiors to read it too! I also wish for her superiorS to at least step in and start over-seeing the case (IN court) @ this point. Its needed. Rather than dump JSS and delay justice AGAIN, I believe this is the more reasonable alternative. But seriously, something HAS to be done. JSS lost control of her courtroom around week 1 in the FIRST trial (Guilt phase, even!) I dont think its going to get any better. & just when we think it can get no worse, JSS proves us all wrong. She has single-handedly ruined confidence in (@ least) the AZ justice system. And that to me is not only sad but ridiculous!
  3. Lori Cavasin
    I agree as well. At first I thought she was just being extremely careful, but now I just think she’s incompetent.
  4. Debi Gilley
    So very true. She is letting the murderes defense team run the trial.
  5. Diana Justus
    Completely agree! Judge Stephens has made this a circus! Why does the defendant have more rights than the victim’s family.
  6. Cara Vancleeve
    Is it acceptable practice for a defendant to refuse to move forward with sentencing, based on the fact that the Appellate court ruled against her? Could the judge demand that the defendant be prepared to continue with testimony next Wednesday? I have never seen a trial where the defendant was in control….until now.
    • Rosemary duke
      I think we need to look into WHY JODI IS HAVING ALL THESE CONTROLS why why why.
      1. So what is the solution ,? Never talked about that ,and the lawyer stopping all the court hearings ,and appeals , is there recorse for him stalling the whole thing ,Some of the stuff is all from last year , hashing it over then saying secret witness ,which was Jodi the defendent herself ?
      2. chris
        Great article and I agree with you 100%. She is torturing the Alexander along with the murderer and he defense team.
      3. The Alexander family gets that knife stabbed in their heart with every delay. Maybe the Judge has a crush on Jodi. This trial needs to proceed and get it over with. Haven’t the Alexander’s suffered ENOUGH..
      4. Spot on. She has catered to the defense, shown a total lack of backbone, reminds me of a boat caught in a storm with no rudder, tossed back n forth aimlessly!
      5. Genie
        Why can’t another judge step in? JSS has made a mockery of this case & is in way over her head, as she is NOT DP qualified.
        She appears to be biased towards jodi at least that is what I see when I see the theatrics she has allowed to go on. 
        She told Juan Martinez that he could NOT mention or show jodi’s lack or remorse or show that she is a liar. 
        If the defense can bring those points up as mitigating factors, why can’t the prosecution show proof these factors are not true?

        I believe JSS is considering extending this *sentencing phase* til January 2-15 because that is what the defense wants!
        The defense is filing some Omnibus & Joinder motions, something about wanting to present different theories to the current jury? 
        Doesn’t the defense realize jodi has already been found GUILTY of Premediatated Murder One? This jury is present, when allowed to be present, to decide her SENTENCE. 
        They are not going to decide whether she is guilty or not nor will they reverse that decision! 
        JSS cannot make an on the spot decision, it always takes her about a week;
        she cannot control her courtroom, she allows nurmi to do that;
        she ties the prosecutions hands on what he CAN and CANNOT prove or talk about & allows the defense EVERY leeway;
        she doesn’t seem to know what she is doing;
        in the last video I saw, she looked upset with Juan Martinez as he told her she had every right to force nurmi to continue with the case, she actually looked upset with Juan throughout his comment but she was very attentive to nurmi, so I am beginning to think she might be prejudiced against Hispanics;
        she conducts business in her chambers;
        she found the ruling by the higher court *confusing*;
        she is like a fish out of water, it’s actually painful to see her floundering about;
        she had plenty of time to clear her docket for THIS case yet court meets 1-2 days a week, if even that!
        Justice delayed has been Justice denied for Travis and his family!
        How long has this case gone on and how many similar cases have been tried, decided, and the inmate is now serving their sentence? What makes jodi so special?
        This jury will probably be dismissed next week and JSS will allow nurmi to continue his games, delays, & motions and this case will be postponed til NEXT YEAR to appease nurmi & jodi. 
        JSS has messed this case up and I don’t know HOW or WHO allowed a Family Court judge to suddenly preside over a Death Penalty case when she had NO Death Penalty qualifications and that is SO evident even to the average person!
        JSS has made a mockery of the court, this case, and a CIRCUS of the AZ Justice system, because EVERYONE is watching & wondering HOW this is allowed to go on or continue.
        A higher court or judge needs to step in and OUST JSS. Someone who is Death Penalty qualified needs to step in.
        The NEW judge only needs to keep the peace, and if he is Death Penalty qualified, he already KNOWS what to do! 
        With JSS, this case WILL go well into at least February of 2015 with all these delays.
        1. JSS has made a mockery of the court, this case, and a CIRCUS of the AZ Justice system, because EVERYONE is watching & wondering HOW this is allowed to go on or continue.
          A higher court or judge needs to step in and OUST JSS. Someone who is Death Penalty qualified needs to step in.
          The NEW judge only needs to keep the peace, and if he is Death Penalty qualified, he already KNOWS what to do! 
          With JSS, this case WILL go well into at least February of 2015 with all these delays.
          A NEW Death Penalty qualifed judge could step in with a MINIMAL delay and this case COULD be wrapped up by December 2014, not June 2015!
          She may be a good Family Court judge, but with her as a judge on this case it looks like a slam dunk for jodi….freedom in 19 years. 
          I’m sorry, I have NO respect for a judge like this, she appears to be PRO jodi!
        2. Jayne
          Brilliantly said!
        3. John Morris
          every one is banging the judge. They are more learned in the law than most commentators. I am sure she knows what she is ruling on.
          • kate
            NO, A-hole. This “judge” does NOT know what she’s doing. If you want to support the heinous murderer with diseased body parts, then go to her support page.
          • Ethel Close
            I thought the Lawyers would be going over the original trial to brief the Jury because it is the final stage that they must vote on. I am confused that there is a secret witness. WHY???? that phase was suppose to be over….
            1. Nurmi wanted off this case time after time and now he’s the one making all these
              Motion’s and hollering mistrial, that’s what he’s after and SOMEBODY NEED’S to
              step in and make JSS follow the law and get thus trial over that should have been
              Yrs ago !
            2. judy
              Well written. I am all for everything said here. My Only fear is calling the judge out now can get IT life instead of death. Although I guess in saying that allowing Judge to keep messing up will do the same
            3. Edie Morse
              Judge Sherry Stephens is a disgrace to the bench. She has violated the AZ Judicial Code of Conduct by granting numerous “ex-parte” meetings to the convicted murderer, resulting in significant tactical advantages & benefits to the killer; she has violated the AZ Victim’s Bill of Rights, with excessive postponements for over a year, 4 months (the original re-trial date was set for July 18th, 2013), at the convicted murderer’s behest; and, she has violated the US Constitution with her unconstitutional secrecy, when the convicted murderer demanded a secret trial. Clearly, Stephens is aided-and-abetting the convicted murderer to avoid the DP; and as such, she should be impeached from office immediately– for, a judge is not supposed to interject her political viewpoints and/or personal bias into a criminal trial. Stephens should hang her head in shame, and Presiding Criminal Judge Norman Davis should replace her with a competent, honest, and fair judge, akin to Judge Steinle who oversaw the Marissa DeVault capital murder trial or Judge Kreamer who adjudicated over the Bryan Wayne Hulsey capital murder trial..
            4. Jesse
              JSS may have learned about the law but she clearly doesn’t know how to display that in this case, she has made a mockery if this case and there is no doubt in my mind if a more qualified and someone who
              Isn’t afraid to take control of their courtroom would have been on this case it would have been long over and done with a Jodi would have her sentence.
            5. Edie Morse
              Judge Sherry Stephens is unfit to serve in public office. She violated the AZ Judicial Code of Conduct when she granted numerous, inappropriate “ex-parte” meetings to Jodi Arias, the convicted murderer, resulting in major tactical advantages & benefits to the unethical defense team; and, she violated the AZ Victim’s Bill of Rights, by granting numerous delays over the course of 2013 & 2014, following the hung jury, last May 2013, demanded by the convicted murderer, after the original final 
              1. penalty re-trial date, was set to begin on July 18th, 2013; and, she has violated the US Constitution with excessive secrecy, as insisted upon by the convicted murderer. The AZ Judiciary (Presiding Criminal Judge Norman Davis) should replace Stephens will a competent, decent, and honest judge, akin to Judge Steinle who adjudicated over the Marissa DeVault capital murder trial or Judge Kreamer who oversaw the Bryan Wayne Husley capital murder trial. Stephens is incompetent, corrupt, and biased; and her coddling of Jodi Arias, the convicted murderer, is unprecedented, costly, and cruel. She is a pathetic excuse for a “judge”, who should be impeached from public office!
              2. Lori
                Agree, this Judge should be very ashamed the way she is running this court room and trial, never have I ever watched a judge do unthinkable things in a case that she has done in this one and especially a DP CASE. JSS should be ashamed of her self and step down from this case or better yet be fired by the higher up courts to get her off this case. JSS is weak and doesn’t have a back bone, she is also Bias. She needs removed from this case ASAP.
              3. Monica Rossy
                Mr. Michael Volkov, I pray the right people with proper credentials and authority read your words and heed your advice because we do need someone higher than the Honorable Judge Stephens to oversee the retrial. I feel she is making reversible decisions to let someone else take the blame for a mistrial. I do not believe she likes the defense team and jodi. And I commiserate with Mr. Juan Martinez, a brilliant and tenacious justice fighter, because he must feel utterly frustrated with JSS. I also agree with commentator Genie here, “Justice delayed has been Justice denied for Travis and his family!” I’m curious now what jodi said in her testimony because I’m afraid she’s trying to tell the new jurors that her dad molested her, a ploy used by Casey Anthony leading to her acquittal.
              4. Lorraine Antonio
                What I can’t understand is why the taxpayers are paying for this when she is making plenty of money on the side??? Why?

Jodi Arias attorneys file new motion for evidence.

Nurmi called it "exculpatory evidence."  Now, all of a sudden, it's violating evidence laws.  

How about ja lying to the police:  illegal.
Lying in court:  illegal.
Stealing:  illegal.
Murder:  illegal.
Stalking:  illegal.
Battery:  illegal
Malicious wounding:  illegal.
Overkill:  illegal.
Entering without breaking: illegal.
Recording two and three way calls without permission:  illegal in many States.
ETC...

ja is guilty of a lot of things.  Press on with ALL of her criminal charges leading up to but not limited to the murder of TA.  




Attorneys allege the state is violating evidence laws by not releasing the reports.

Read more: http://www.kpho.com/story/27754063/jodi-arias-attorneys-file-new-motion-for-evidence#ixzz3NtQuLVsU







http://www.kpho.com/story/27754063/jodi-arias-attorneys-file-new-motion-for-evidence

Jodi Arias Demands Previously Undisclosed Reports on Police Probe of Victim's Laptop


WHO writes this BS?  The "alleged" porn BS has NOTHING to do with why ja planned, murdered TA, and then tried to cover her tracks.  The "alleged" porn BS came up on ja's part when she tried to gain sympathy from the jurors and her supporters by trying to make TA appear to be a pedophile.  Poor ja...waaah!  ja wrote the pedophile letters, so by definition, ja is a PEDOPHILE herself!  

JM didn't use the "alleged" porn BS that ja's tried to put in there to discredit the LYING B's testimony!  ja LIED to EVERYONE from the start...from the second and after she murdered TA.  I'm sure that the Troopers aren't the only ones that didn't miss ja's police interrogation tapes, those of her parents, the words of her grandfather's, and all of the interviews with the media where she LIED over and over again.  B is a LIAR!  The ONLY person that marred her character and testimony was ja! 

Exculpatory evidence is evidence that could prove innocence or a lessor charge.  Even if "porn" existed, it would NOT constitute a retrial or a dismissal of charges.  ja is guilty of First Degree Murder...overkill.  



http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2015/01/jodi_arias_demands_previously_undisclosed_reports_on_police_probe_of_victim.php