George Barwood's BS never STOPS.
ja is not an abused woman.
Find "Understanding The Travesties of Unexpected Murder Trials" on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/BestNewsSiteCoveringtheAriasTrial
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
THE MASTER PLAN TO MURDER-AND GET AWAY By: Understanding The Travesties of Unexpected Murder Trials
THE MASTER PLAN TO MURDER - AND GET AWAY
The Readers of Understanding the Travesties of Unexpected Murder Trials, compiled the following Master List of each and every thing Jodi Arias did in preparation of her pre-meditated murder of Travis Alexander, listing too, her behavior and actions after June 4, 2008. When perusing these facts, it is unthinkable to see how Jodi Arias could be deemed as anything but blatantly guilty of a vicious murder, which she not only pre-planned, but hoped to get away with, and we hope that this list will help remind everyone about the true facts of this case and why an accurate sentencing of the convicted killer, is important, when placed against the cruel nature of her planned crime which was no less than the murder of the 31 year young Travis Alexander.
BEFORE THE TRIP TO VISIT TRAVIS AND MURDER HIM
Filed a police report about the "stolen" Helio phone that had the sex conversation on it May 18th, as she recorded that phone sex without his knowledge, and told him she had it, and that knowledge was the last straw for Travis which precipitated the May 26th interaction ("you're the worst thing that ever happened to me") By reporting it stolen, no one would know that Travis had angered her, and she could maintain that they never had a fight and she had nothing to do with the murder
Because Travis was not taking Jodi along with her, she strategically picked the date just before Travis was set to leave for Cancun, so that he wouldn't live to visit the place before he died
Carried out the staged robbery where she stole not only the 25 caliber pistol, but also the DVD player she probably traded for the gas cans.
Took off work long enough to go to Southern California, Arizona, and UtahMessed up her own hard drive in advance
Got gas cans from Daryl
Did not want want a red rental car that could be noticed
Dyed her hair.
Used taking pictures of Darryl Brewer's sister's baby as an excuse and had an alibi of pics for Daryl's sister(journal)
Took calls to Travis on her way to murder him (she had to find out if he would be home)
Had a case of water in car for clean up
IN ARIZONA
Had her cell phone off during the entire time she was in Arizona.
Saved receipts from places other than in Arizona
Timed her arrival in Mesa at a time when everyone was asleep
Did not park in the driveway (no roommates noticed her car, IIRC)
Entered the house through the garage door/undetected
Got Travis Alexander into the shower as a deliberate move to make sure he was vulnerable so the sound of the water running would muffle any murder sounds.
Tampered with Travis Alexander's computer and Internet accounts
Went through through Southern California to pick up gas cans to hide route through Arizona.
Used her credit card for purchases other than for gas for gas cans.
Brought CDs of pics for victim but was ''not planning to see victim''.
Turned off phone before entering Arizona and did not turn back on until she thought she was out of Arizona.
MURDER
Stuffed victim Travis in the shower.
Poured water on the bathroom floor - tried to clean up.
Deleted certain camera pics (sex and pre and during murder).
Took off her socks to keep blood in bathroom/hall-crime scene.
Showered over Travis's dead corpse hence her hair in shower, left bloody hand print in hall from Travis's blood and her cut finger
Put camera in wash, (arguably with bleach)
Moved sheets to dryer prior to running her load.
Locked bedroom door.
Put up gate at stairs to keep dog downstairs.
AFTER MURDER
Threw away gun "in desert."
Threw away clothes.
Threw away knife.
Never had a rope - concocted that story as a way of trying to explain why a knife used in crime scene.
Threw away floor mats.
Cleaned up before check point at Hoover Dam
Engaged in license tag tampering - flipping it over
Called victim phone, listened to his messages and left him a long message trying to bolster alibi (so lost - trying to account for hours of missing time - time in AZ committing murder).
Made other calls lying and trying to continue covering time in Arizona
Packed a screw driver, using it to remove license plates, using it to reattach one plate (upside down).
Wore long sleeve sweater in Utah despite the heat of 90 degrees
Lied to Police Officers about skateboard boys messing with license plates
Went along to meet with and make out with alibi Ryan Burns
Wrapped her bandaged hands and said they were from waiting glasses at ''Margaretville'' - a place that never existed
BACK HOME
Called Detective Flores when she got curious about wanting to find out what they knew
When she was arrested - was planning another trip
Texted Travis after killing him and told him she was paying him money she owed him
Took a selfie to show her dyed brown hair.
Sent an e-mail to Travis after the murder
Invited him to ''Othello'' after the murder
Acted surprised with Daniel Freeman's call regarding the death
Wrote make-believe stories of shock and tears in her journal regarding Travis' death to fake her innocence
Sent flowers to Travis Alexander's grandmother
Cried to her mother and father and denied being in Arizona to her mother, saying she has receipts to prove it
Lied to her siblings when she pretended to be devastated
Wrote on Travis Alexander's memorial book
Attended Travis Alexander's memorial service
Pretended she got a flat tire on the day of the funeral
Wanted to pass and take a look at Travis Alexander's house
Uploaded a Youtube video after the murder
Uploaded a Myspace album ''in loving memory'' of Travis Alexander
AFTER ARREST
Wrote a long letter to his siblings
Smiled for her mug shot as she was the happy murderer
Offered to help Detective Flores
Pretended she was sad to Detective Flores
Made up a litany of lies to the media during her many interviews
Forged letters from Travis
Wanted to see the pictures again (morbid curiosity)
Denied she was ever there but couldn't keep it up due to DNA evidence
Made up the ninja story
IN PRISON
Wrote coded messages on a magazine to a potential witness and wanted him to change what he said
IN COURT
Made up stories against her own mother and father to give her some mitigation reasons
Made up the self-defense story
Made up the Pedophilia story
Made up stories about the Porn on Travis Alexander's Computer
Find "Understanding The Travesties of Unexpected Murder Trials" on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/BestNewsSiteCoveringtheAriasTrial
Why does ja wear shirts that show "too much skin" inside of the courtroom? Photo Credit: UTTUMT
You can join "Understanding The Travesties of Unexpected Murder Trials" Facebook page on the link below:
https://www.facebook.com/BestNewsSiteCoveringtheAriasTrial
I found this photo of ja on the internet. Credit For The Words Edited On The Photo: Kim Lapara David
It appears that not only does ja find a camera to look into while inside of the courtroom, but ja appears to attempt a pose for the camera in the picture above.
Day 29 of the Jodi Arias trial: 'Shove,' 'push' spark arguments
http://www.kpho.com/story/27939733/day-29-of-the-jodi-arias-trial-shove-push-spark-arguments?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed
Monday, January 26, 2015
Summing up today's events.
Did you find anywhere a supported documentation of the DV from Travis
Geff- Just Jodi's word
Geffner's whole testimony is based on the lies that $kank and her witnesses have said. Today was just another "wasted" day out of the jurors lives that the jury had to endure due to a liar(s). So far, I haven't read anything that makes today any different than any of the other BS days of Geffner's BS.
Question was regarding norms
Geff-The testing didn't include incarcerated people
Of course the testing he did on $kank didn't include incarcerated people. Shady Geffner thought he could pull a fast one over on the jury...didn't think they were intelligent enough to put two and two together. smh...LOSER.
Another of the DTs Motion By: Court Chatter Monday, January 26, 2015 Photo Credit: UTTUMT
Jodi Arias: Defense motion to preclude State's witness
PHOTO CREDIT: "UNDERSTANDING THE TRAVESTIES OF UNEXPECTED MURDER TRIALS"
http://www.courtchatter.com/2015/01/jodi-arias-defense-motion-to-preclude.html?spref=tw
PHOTO CREDIT: "UNDERSTANDING THE TRAVESTIES OF UNEXPECTED MURDER TRIALS"
http://www.courtchatter.com/2015/01/jodi-arias-defense-motion-to-preclude.html?spref=tw
Monday, January 26, 2015 DTs Motion. By: Court Chatter
Jodi Arias: Defense motion requesting a mistrial based on prosecutor disclosing mitigation witness name in open court, revealing the name of an expert witness & accusing Dr. Geffner of "smearing" the victim
http://www.courtchatter.com/2015/01/jodi-arias-defense-motion-requesting.html?spref=tw
Sunday, January 25, 2015
"Ridin' the Omnibus" Written By: Edie Morse
"Ridin' the 'Omnibus'"...
"'Omnibus'... An omnibus hearing is a criminal pretrial hearing." -USLegal.com
"For there is but one essential justice which cements society, and one law which establishes this justice. This law is right reason, which is the true rule of all commandments and prohibitions. Whoever neglects this law, whether written or unwritten, is necessarily unjust and wicked.” - Marcus Tullius Cicero, On the laws
"The true mystery of the world is the visible, not the invisible.” - Oscar Wilde
The wheels of the mysterious "Omnibus Hearing" have now been set in motion and are rolling forward, and we know for a fact that Jodi Arias has jumped on board, aided-and-abetted by Judge Sherry Stephens (JSS), with the approval by Judge Joseph Kreamer, because filings posted on the convicted murderer's AZ Maricopa County Superior Court Docket & Minute Entries both reflect that the psycho-killer is being allowed to ride on the "Omnibus" in the hopes that the Death Penalty will be taken "off-the-table". The mystery is why the AZ Media remain silent... and a cloud of fascist-style secrecy permeates Skank's cynically devised "Omnibus" tactical ploy.
On Friday, January 23rd, 2015, a Status Conference took place, in which Jodi Arias and a group of approximately a dozen or so defendants all charged with 1st degree premeditated murder, appeared before Judge Kreamer in preparation for an "Omnibus Hearing" that was originally scheduled for February 6th, 2015. Afterwards, another Status Conference was re-scheduled for late April 24th & the "Omnibus Hearing" for early May 8th, of this year-- and, all of these defendants are hoping that the State's "Notice of the Death Penalty" will be vacated. Wouldn't you think that somebody, anybody for that matter, in the AZ Media might have been interested to attend this pretrial status conference in order to ascertain why Jodi Arias is the only convicted murderer, in the middle of a penalty re-trial, who has been allowed to join-up & jump on the "Omnibus" bandwagon? The AZ Media's stark lack of curiosity is astounding, if not suspicious, if truth be told. Has somebody in a powerful position in the AZ Judiciary and/or the powerful AZ Defense Attorney Lobby asked the AZ Media to remain silent? Who the hell are the AZ Media serving? Certainly not the best interests of the public!
None of the other defendants who have jumped on the "Omnibus" have even faced their murder trials, as yet. They are still awaiting trial, and as such, in the eyes of the law, they are still considered to be innocent until proven guilty. By contrast, Jodi Arias has already been tried and convicted of 1st degree premeditated murder, with the aggravating factor of cruelty, for her savage butchery of Travis Alexander, in May 2013... and the last jury found for the aggravating factor of especial cruelty... rendering her eligible for the Death Penalty. A jury was impanelled in October 2014-- (over a year following the original final penalty re-trial date of July 18th, 2013, which was bizarrely postponed over and over and over again, without explanation)-- in order to commence the rendering of a judgment about her sentence of either the DP or Life, and thus, this nightmarish re-trial is now nearing 3 months in duration, with no end in sight. In the State of Arizona, a jury is chosen to decide the killer's fate unless both the defendant and the State agree to waive trial by jury, as per the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure 13-752:--
"At the penalty phase, if the trier of fact is a jury and the jury is unable to reach a verdict, the court shall dismiss the jury and shall impanel a new jury. The new jury shall not retry the issue of the defendant's guilt or the issue regarding any of the aggravating circumstances that the first jury found by unanimous verdict to be proved or not proved. If the new jury is unable to reach a unanimous verdict, the court shall impose a sentence of life or natural life on the defendant .." - AZ 13-752 (K)
""Trier of fact" means a jury unless the defendant and the state waive a jury, in which case the trier of fact shall be the court." - AZ 13-752 (S)
Therefore, it is the jury who decides upon a Death Penalty verdict, not a judge, in the State of Arizona, unless both sides, i.e. the defendant & the State, were to agree to waive a jury trial-- in which case the judge would decide upon LWOP or LWP. And as such, the fact that Jodi Arias has been allowed to jump on this highly camouflaged. "Omnibus" begs the question as to what her legal argument has been. An "Omnibus Hearing" is a "pretrial" vehicle that is used by the Court, in this case, to decide whether or not that there are grounds to dismiss the State's "Notice of the Death Penalty" for a pool of defendants-- and, it appears that when JA & Co. found about it, that they manipulated JSS into letting the psycho-butcher "take it for a ride". That this particular "Omnibus" is being ridden by a group of defendants, rather than each defendant's case being heard, one-on-one, on the basis of its' own individual merits, deserves an honest explanation to the public by the AZ Judiciary, forthwith. That Jodi Arias is a different beast altogether, and that her own case is an entirely different animal-- since unlike the rest, she is a convicted murderer, whose penalty re-trial is in-progress-- compels the right of the public to expect full and immediate disclosure as to what legally-based scenario, if any, justifies such extraordinary special favoritism shown to her, over and above that which is granted to other convicted killers. Consider the following:--
1. A prominent high-profile attorney has advised me, that in the event, that all of the defendants, including Jodi Arias, were served with the same "Notice of the Death Penalty" by the State, and that, should Judge Kreamer decide to vacate the DP, then the dismissal of the DP would apply to them all, as a "blanket" decision. No exceptions:-- i.e. Jodi Arias' DP sentence, along with the other defendants' DP notices would be taken "off-the-table". Logically, that would seem to indicate that each defendant's case is not being considered based upon its' own merits, but instead, on the basis of the State's rationale and/or argument in constructing the "Notice of the Death Penalty" itself. If the State, for example, has incorrectly derived a "Notice of the Death Penalty" that is deemed to be invalid by the Court, then wouldn't every defendant have a legal claim to demand that theirs too be over-turned? -- e.g. Not only those defendants who have been charged with murder but whose cases have not, as yet, come to trial; but also, those convicted murderers who have already been sentenced to the Death Penalty, under the same conditions as the former, could surely now demand that their DP sentences too be vacated. This "Omnibus" is taking a ride through a legal mine-field:-- e.g. Bryan Wayne Hulsey's attorneys might want to sit up and take notice. In the State of Arizona, the prosecutor is entitled to pursue the Death Penalty, in those cases, whereby the defendant is charged with 1st degree premeditated murder. It is the AZ Legislature who codifies the law governing the DP, not the Courts who are there to uphold the law-- and ergo, the AZ Judiciary might well be advised to remember that, and not to try to push a political agenda formulated by the anti-DP lobby, via an underhanded judicial fiat, i.e. judicial tyranny.
2. If however, under a different scenario, which we do not know would occur, Judge Kreamer were to assess his decision on a case-by-case basis, then why would this "Omnibus Hearing" be a group-hearing, akin to a "class action lawsuit", rather than an individual case-by-case appeal by each defendant separately via their own specific pretrial conference? In this country, we do not allow group-murder trials for our citizens who commit unrelated killings, as an example-- to be distinguished from a murder trial whereby more than one defendant is charged with a joint-crime against the same victim or victims. Each defendant is granted an individual trial for a serious charge, like murder, when there are no accomplices. Are all of the defendants in this "Omnibus Hearing", including Jodi Arias, claiming a violation by the State of the Rules of Disclosure, which is a standard reason for holding such a pretrial hearing? If so, then Judge Sherry Stephens has already ruled that there has been no violation by the prosecutor, Juan Martinez vis-à-vis the Rules of Disclosure (AZ Rule 15.1) in rulings by JA & Co., asking to dismiss the Death Penalty, over the past 2 years. Why would Judge Kreamer be asked to entertain what would be tantamount to an appellate case, which should be filed with the Court of Appeals and the AZ Supreme Court, after Jodi Arias is finally sentenced? And, are all of these other defendants making the same kind of claim too? The difference would be, from a legal standpoint, in their cases, that they are entitled to request a "pretrial" review because they have not to-date faced their trial by jury-- whereas, Jodi Arias has had her day in court, and was found guilty of 1st degree premeditated murder, with the aggravating factor of cruelty.
3. As a result of the vast legal difference between Jodi Arias' position as a convicted murderer, and that of the other defendants, not as yet tried and/or convicted, what is really going on behind-the-scenes, regarding this particular "Omnibus Hearing"? Could it be that a gaggle of anti-DP lobbyists, including a gang of defense attorneys "on-the-make" for defendants charged with 1st degree premeditated murder, have taken it upon themselves to manipulate the AZ Judiciary into conducting a politically-motivated "trial by fiat", using the "Omnibus" as their front-loader, to commence removing the DP, because they are unhappy that the citizens of the State of Arizona have not pressured the legislature into changing the law? If so, then this unscrupulous tactic is the kind of judicial hijacking of the criminal justice system by unethical terrorist-lawyers that the public should be made aware of ASAP, before it becomes a way-of-life by which corrupt judges & shyster lawyers illegally over-ride laws that they simply choose to ignore, because they don't like them-- i.e. like the US Constitution, which JSS has repeatedly violated in order to coddle Jodi Arias & her dishonest attorneys!
It's very clear, imo, that the AZ Media are complicit in covering-up, what may become a catastrophic miscarriage of justice, by playing "lap-dog" to some power-brokers involved in this Hot Mess-- i.e. (a) by not attending the "Omnibus Hearing" to report back the ramifications of what has taken place-- (b) by not reporting upon the legal rationale employed for conducing this "Omnibus Hearing", in the first place-- and, (c) worst of all, by not even asking basic questions about how it has come to pass that Jodi Arias, a convicted murderer, has been allowed to join the "Omnibus Hearing", a Pretrial Hearing. The citizens of the State of Arizona may or may not give a damn, or perhaps, they are simply are unaware of the sordid & squalid events which are transpiring in the AZ Maricopa County Superior Courthouse because the AZ Media is keeping them in the dark-- but, citizens throughout this country beware:-- for We the People do not want to wake-up one day and find that our US Constitution has been trampled asunder and that we are living under a tyrannical regime. The citizenry of any US State ought to engage in a spirited debate about whether or not to retain the DP-- that's a valid debate to be had-- but, the AZ Judiciary has no right to exploit nefarious, quasi-illegal means, in order to get around the law. That's downright crooked and it is unconstitutional!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
There are more questions than answers swirling around this bizarre "Omnibus Hearing", and in my opinion, it is vital for We the People to pose these questions to the AZ Judiciary, the AZ Media, and the AZ Political Machine, including the Governor, the Legislators, and, the State's Attorney's Office too. For public scrutiny is more important than ever... especially for those conscientious citizens who seek Justice4Travis, and who want to see Jodi Arias sentenced to the DP, or failing that, LWOP. The public deserve answers to the following questions:--
* On what basis has this "Omnibus Hearing" been granted to a pool of defendants charged with 1st degree premeditated murder? Is there a generic case to be made against the "Notice of the Death Penalty" filed by the State, or is each defendant's case being considered on its' own merits? Will the decision made by Judge Kreamer be a "blanket" decision applying to all of the defendants alike regardless of circumstance, or will each case incur a potentially different outcome?
* Why has Jodi Arias, a convicted murderer, whose last jury unanimously found her guilty of 1st degree premeditated murder, and also, with an aggravating factor of "especial cruelty", and who is in the middle of a penalty trial to determine whether or not that she will get the Death Penalty, allowed to attach herself to the "Omnibus Hearing", i.e. a Pretrial Hearing? Jodi Arias' case is no longer "pretrial", by any definition of that term. If she can jump on the "Omnibus", then why not other defendants, who have already been sentenced to the DP, including Bryan Wayne Hulsey, for example?
* Is it criminally fraudulent to mislead citizens impanelled as jurors, who in good faith are doing their duty, and believe that they are deciding upon the fate of the convicted murderer, Jodi Arias, but who are unaware that the "rug might be pulled out" from underneath their decision via the "Omnibus" Vehicle? Any "Omnibus Hearing" should take place prior to trial, not after a jury has been called to decide upon the DP or Life! Why would any judge ask a jury to make such a sacrifice (i.e. Skank's final penalty re-trial was supposed to be concluded by the end of December, 2014, so said JSS-- but now, it is being dragged out by JA & Co. until the end of February, and perhaps beyond), when the judge, Judge Sherry Stephens, has allowed the convicted murderer to "game the system" by jumping on the "Omnibus"? Shouldn't the jury be advised that Jodi Arias is riding the "Omnibus" in the hope that the DP will be taken "off-the-table"? The jury appear to be laboring under false pretenses, as JSS engineers the ways-and-means for JA & Co. to avoid the DP.
* When will the over 120 sealed documents; the transcripts from the many sealed hearings; and, the transcripts from the numerous inappropriate "ex-parte" meetings be made public? Within these unconstitutionally secret documents are the discussions which have transpired between this incompetent, biased, and corrupt judge, JSS, and JA & Co., which may cast light upon the rationale (and, the manipulations) which took place, leading JSS to manoeuver Jodi Arias to the "Omnibus Hearing." And, if it is found that JSS actually colluded with JA & Co. in order to "game" the trial proceedings, to be delayed for over a year-and-seven-months, from the hung jury, in May 2013, in order to enable the convicted murderer to avoid the Death Penalty, and to steer her to this "Omnibus Hearing", then JSS may be in direct violation of the law, as well as having violated her oath of office, and the public trust. Already, JSS has demonstrated that she is all too ready & willing to violate the US Constitution, the AZ Victims' Bill of Rights, the AZ Judicial Code of Conduct, and the AZ Legal Statutes governing the Disclosure of Witnesses by the Defendant to the State, in undue deference towards Jodi Arias. What other laws might have been violated by JSS?
* What is the nature of the relationship between the AZ Media & the AZ Judiciary, particularly in AZ Maricopa County? Why have JSS's many serious infractions of the law gone un-reported? Why is JSS allowed to let JA & Co. run-amok, without any serious investigative reporting taking place? Why has JSS's special treatment & unbelievable favoritism towards the convicted murderer been "swept under the carpet"? Why is it that the State is pummeled by the press reporters, but that gross negligence (e.g. lack of courtroom decorum; delays without precedent for a penalty re-trial; etc.); blatant incompetence (e.g. inability to rule in a timely manner; allowing DT to commit perjury & fraud; etc.); and, criminal wrongdoing by the judge (e.g. many inappropriate "ex-parte" meetings with convicted killer; unconstitutional secrecy; violation of the AZ Victims' Bill of Rights; etc.), JSS, is simply glossed over and excused with no expectation of public accountability? Why is this "Omnibus Hearing" such a big secret?
There have been too many unprecedented, inexplicable, and wrongheaded gifts, in violation of the law, given by JSS to Jodi Arias, over the course of the last year-and-seven-months, such that it is long overdue for the public to demand answers. Jurors are currently being asked to undertake the serious & grave duty to decide upon whether or not that Jodi Arias will get the Death Penalty. The AZ taxpayers are footing the bill for this nightmarish fiasco, due to the fact that this appallingly bad judge has been unable to manage the trial proceedings in a competent manner. The victims, the Alexanders, whose beloved brother was brutally slaughtered by Jodi Arias, have been forced to endure the back-breaking burden of delay after delay after delay, as well as the heart-breaking tragedy of watching Travis' reputation being dragged through the muck-and-the-mire by a hapless judge and an unethical defense team, who are defrauding the Court with lies, fabrications, and outright misleading testimony based upon perjurious testimony by hired-gun "experts" & crooked "affidavits".
The lack of integrity by JSS, as she has badly undermined the judicial process, particularly throughout this sentencing phase, is chronically obvious to those conscientious citizens who care deeply about our criminal justice system. The jury is the "trier of fact" in this farcical final penalty re-trial-- and for the "Omnibus Hearing" to be exploited to undermine their decision, if their decision is the Death Penalty, is wrong. It's wrong ethically. And, it may be wrong legally too. Jodi Arias will appeal her conviction & her sentence:-- she has been allowed to raise money over the course of the last few years, although she is classified as "indigent", and she has been bragging about her future appeals. Why afford the psycho-butcher this ride on the "Omnibus"? This is the question that the AZ Media should be asking. When referring to our justice system, the great U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wisely observed:--
"Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman."
Without the light of public scrutiny, and, without the media reporting upon what is taking place in this trial, and others too... and, without our publically-elected officials held accountable for their actions, including JSS, an arrogant, foolish judge, in the AZ Maricopa County Superior Court... our criminal justice system is being corrupted before our very eyes, as we watch this nightmarish re-trial unfold. ... It's not always the new lie revealed in the courtroom that counts-- but also, the gaming-of-the-system by setting the plot-line, down-the-road, like this exploitation by JSS and JA & Co. of this mysterious "Omnibus Hearing." ... The shroud of secrecy which has covered the truth in the Jodi Arias trial has proven to be very, very costly and very, very destructive... and, if this is a harbinger of things to come... it should scare thinking people. Is this really how we want our justice system to be manipulated by judges & attorneys run-amok? Get Jodi Arias off of that "Omnibus" now!
