"Nicole was a waitress at Purple Plum: 'JA said she was a goddess, smelled like a goddess, looked like a goddess. She was all over the men'" - Jen, Trial Diaries, 02/03/2015
"Goddess" is what Skank believes herself to be. Ted Bundy said:-- “Murder is not about lust and it's not about violence. It's about possession. When you feel the last breath of life coming out of the woman, you look into her eyes. At the point, it's being God.”
Skank believes herself to be a "God", above the law... and feels entitled to brutally slaughter those who do not please her. She savagely butchered Travis Alexander to death, and she has threatened the life of the prosecutor, Juan Martinez, i.e. to have him murdered if she gets the Death Penalty.
The "Purple Plum" incident was revealed during Juan Martinez's direct examination of Dr. Janeen DeMarte, yesterday, and it exposed to this jury that Jodi Arias is not the innocent victim of men. The stereotypical myth that the "male" is always the sexual predator, and that the "female" is always the victim who recoils in horror but then reluctantly gives into male domination was exploded to smitherings in the courtroom by Juan Martinez and Dr. DeMarte. That age-old myth certainly does not apply in Jodi Arias' case. In the aftermath of having gutted her victim, Travis Alexander, to death, nearly decapitating him, and then shooting him in the head, this is what she did:--
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ:--
"Nicole was a waitress at Purple Plum "JA said she was a goddess, smelled like a goddess, looked like a goddess. She was all over the men""
"Nicole was a waitress at Purple Plum "JA said she was a goddess, smelled like a goddess, looked like a goddess. She was all over the men""
Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial:--
"Interview of co-worker: "#JodiArias said she was a goddess, smelled like a goddess, looked like a goddess." Nurmi objects. Approach."
"Interview of co-worker: "#JodiArias said she was a goddess, smelled like a goddess, looked like a goddess." Nurmi objects. Approach."
Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer:--
"DeMarte reads another remark from Purple Plum friends about #jodiarias being all over the young men."
"DeMarte reads another remark from Purple Plum friends about #jodiarias being all over the young men."
Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial:--
"Co-worker says #JodiArias was all over men and was heavily distracted by men. Jurors take notes."
"Co-worker says #JodiArias was all over men and was heavily distracted by men. Jurors take notes."
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ:--
" Nicole- JA was all over the young men & couldn't stay focused. She was very inappropriate w/ men, she would sit and kiss Edgar. #jodiarias"
" Nicole- JA was all over the young men & couldn't stay focused. She was very inappropriate w/ men, she would sit and kiss Edgar. #jodiarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ:--
"She was very inappropriate with Edgar according to Nicole #jodiarias#3tvarias"
"She was very inappropriate with Edgar according to Nicole #jodiarias#3tvarias"
Cathy retweeted
Tammy Rose @News20Chopper:--
"#JodiArias told DeMarte about 4 alleged domestic violence incidents. October 2007, January 2008, March 2008 & April 2008."
Tammy Rose @News20Chopper:--
"#JodiArias told DeMarte about 4 alleged domestic violence incidents. October 2007, January 2008, March 2008 & April 2008."
Cathy retweeted:
Tammy Rose @News20Chopper:--
"#JodiArias said she looked and smelled like a goddess and was all over the men. Sidebar." - (Courtesy of JoAnn Jukes)
Tammy Rose @News20Chopper:--
"#JodiArias said she looked and smelled like a goddess and was all over the men. Sidebar." - (Courtesy of JoAnn Jukes)
Jodi Arias Arias was all over the men... she was inappropriate with Edgar, at the "Purple Plum". The manager of the restaurant said that Jodi Arias would ignore the female & other customers and hone in on the handsome young men:--
The Trial Diaries, 02/03/2015:--
"This is an interview with Gary Brinkman the owner of the "Purple Plum":--
"Gary knew Jodi since she was 17"
"Gary said in 2008 Jodi came back and wanted a job. She only paid attention to the men and ignored the female customers. She flirted with the good looking guys. Jodi used men and once pretended she just moved to Yreka and asked the guy to show her around".
"Julie Arias was interviewed. Jodi's half sister - Jodi stopped at Julies after TA's memorial. Jodi gave a guy her name and number and then she called this guy from Julies house."
Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial:--
"She would go right to the men & ignore the women & other customers. Must more friendly & flirtatious with the good looking guys"
"She would go right to the men & ignore the women & other customers. Must more friendly & flirtatious with the good looking guys"
Tammy Rose @News20Chopper:--
"Dr. DeMarte reading testimony from one of #JodiArias' bosses. "She would go right to the men and ignore other customers."
"Dr. DeMarte reading testimony from one of #JodiArias' bosses. "She would go right to the men and ignore other customers."
Jodi Arias was not a meek, innocent, virginal little flower... She was very aggressive sexually, and although JA & Co. have dishonestly portrayed Travis Alexander as a hyper-sexual predator, who hunted down his female prey and then coerced or pressured them into sex, his own past girlfriends tell of a very different experience:-- for they have described him as respectful always of their own wishes. The testimony by Jodi Arias' co-workers & even own words reveal just the opposite too, of the perjurious fraud that JA & Co. have perpetrated upon both juries. Jodi Arias manipulated men using sex, because that was the only way that she could attract their attention. These are a few of Jodi Arias' own text messages & words from the infamous "sex-tape" to Travis Alexander:--
Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial:--
"JA is texting TA she wants a facial and will give TA a BJ, or they can just grind." (DeMarte has a way hotter voice than Willmott reading these smutty texts lol)
"JA is texting TA she wants a facial and will give TA a BJ, or they can just grind." (DeMarte has a way hotter voice than Willmott reading these smutty texts lol)
Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial:--
"Maybe you could give my ass a much needed pounding too." De reads, Juan confirms "assertiveness" & self-esteem"
"Maybe you could give my ass a much needed pounding too." De reads, Juan confirms "assertiveness" & self-esteem"
Tammy Rose @News20Chopper:--
"Dr. DeMarte reading some racy emails between #JodiArias and Travis. "If you're a lucky boy and give me a well deserved spanking."
"Dr. DeMarte reading some racy emails between #JodiArias and Travis. "If you're a lucky boy and give me a well deserved spanking."
" DeMarte says this shows Jodi is assertive"
"Jodi is telling TA she wants to lick him up and F him like a dirty horny school girl"
' DeMarte says JA expressed her desires and it wasn't dictated by TA" - (Courtesy of Shelley Shaffer)
Jodi Arias was demeaning towards her family members too, and her cousin Aimee described her as acting like a "bitch", always correcting everybody else's grammar, and her grandparents revealed that the killer complained that she did not want "anyone ruling her life". ... That describes the kind of self-absorbed, cry-baby complaints that I can picture Jodi Arias howling during one of her many temper-tantrums:-- "I won't let anybody rule my life!"... "Nobody is going to tell me what to do!"... "I can do whatever I want!". Nothing will contain Jodi Arias. There is no law; no boundaries; and, no moral canon that she respects. Jodi Arias is a law unto herself. She always was, and she always will be.
No society can allow violent thugs & goons who have no respect for the law to run-amok... because then the citizens cannot live with any security. No society can permit self-indulgent predators to invade the boundaries of other people... for the people can then not enjoy any peace of mind. No society can watch while a psycho-butcher tramples asunder any moral canon which restrains the members of that culture from preying upon and destroying the lives of other people. Society has the right, and even the obligation, to punish those perpetrators of violent crimes, like murder, rape, theft, and stalking, harassment, and fraud too, in order to create an environment in which law-abiding people can live without fear.
Jodi Arias has violated the most sacred law established by God and Man:-- i.e. she committed Murder. Jodi Arias was not acting in self-defense. She tracked down her prey, tormenting him, and killed him in a heinous, depraved, and cruel manner, simply because he had rejected her. In the aftermath of her brutal slaughter of Travis Alexander, she went a sexin' man after man after man. Jodi Arias has never suffered any genuine remorse. In fact, she has relished her far more than "15 Minutes of Fame", and has exploited social media over the past year-and-seven months, since the hung jury, in May 2013, in order to hock her worthless crap for money; and to dupe the weak-minded into donating money to her JAA Appeals Fund scam; and worst of all, to continue to malign her victim, Travis Alexander, with the most malicious lies. Jodi Arias deserves the Death Penalty.
Edie Morse The AZ Media hacks who shill for the powerful AZ Defense Attorney Lobby are already starting to scapegoat the State for the length & cost of this never-ending final penalty re-trial. A recent AZ article says:--
"The Jodi Arias penalty trial has begun a fifth month with no clear end in sight. ... It's unclear how much longer the prosecution will need to reinforce what it began in October."
I think it's unclear as to how much longer that JA & Co. will "need" to reinforce what it began in May 2013! The AZ Media don't both to ask why this sentencing phase has been dragged on for so long! "It's not Juan Martinez, Stupid!" The State's prosecutor has taken less than a quarter of the time that this unethical defense team have squandered thanks to an incompetent, biased, and corrupt judge, Judge Sherry Stephens (JSS), who has allowed JA & Co. to defraud the Court with "hired gun" charlatans posing as "experts" but who have filibustered with lie after lie after lie; fraudulent "affidavits" concocted by the convicted murderer & her criminal cohorts; and, worst of all a fabricated "Porn-Gate" created to delay the trial & waste time; trash the victim, Travis Alexander; and, malign the prosecutor with perjurious allegations.
"Porn-Gate" never should have been allowed in, in the first place. Like the fake, forged pedophile letters manufactured by JA to frame Travis Alexander for non-existent pedophilia:-- it was FRAUD. JA & Co.'s entire bogus defense case is retrying the original guilt phase of the trial, in violation of the law... and, they are retrying it by defrauding the Court & the Jury. There is no evidence that Travis Alexander was even remotely interested in "porn"; and, no evidence that the State "mishandled" evidence. By contrast, there is much evidence that JA & Co. have done so-- and imo, Jodi Arias, her PI Dorian Bond, Bryan Neumeister, and, Maria "Smuggler" De La Rosa should be investigated for having concocted this dishonest scheme. Jodi Arias enjoys an "indigent" classification, although she is permitted to swindle the AZ taxpayers, all because JSS has delayed the re-trial over and over and over again for this convicted murderer!
A more experienced judge would have kept "Porn-Gate" out, in the first place... for it has been the trigger for so many delays & dishonest trashing of the victim and the prosecutor. Juan Martinez must fight this... but, what JA & Co. really want is to get to the "Omnibus Hearing" so that the DP will be taken "off-the-table", although the "Omnibus Hearing" is a pretrial hearing-- and, JA is not in any kind of "pretrial" status. Of course, by then, it may become a moot issue, because over time, jurors may drop off like flies. I think that JA & Co. are throwing stuff at Juan Martinez, which requires that Det. Smith has to try to perform more research in order to explain "Porn-Gate" fully... They have sent him on a "Wild Goose Chase", to blame Juan Martinez for the delays.
JSS and JA & Co. need to be held accountable by the public; and, all of the over 120 sealed documents; the many secret, sealed hearings, and the myriad illegal "ex-parte" meetings which triggered this undue deference by JSS towards the convicted murderer & her unethical defense team, all should be made public... and then, you will find out why this farcical, rigged re-trial has cost the AZ taxpayers so much of their hard-earned dollars!!!
Refer to:--
http://www.azcentral.com/.../12news-jodi-arias.../22796081/
Edie Morse This morning, JSS will entertain Nurmi's motion asking that Det. Smith's testimony be precluded from evidence:--
* 1/30/2015 MOT - Motion - Party (001) 2/2/2015
NOTE: MOTION TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OF MESA PD DET. SMITH FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY DISCLOSE REPORT PRIOR TO TESTIMONY
I think that this motion to ask that Det. Smith's testimony be precluded has been Nurmi's real target, and that his motion filed yesterday asking to preclude Dr. DeMarte's testimony, which he knew that JSS had to reject, was a diversionary tactic. Det. Smith can show that Neumeister lied, and that "Porn-Gate" was a fraud, imo... and, when that is "blown out of the water"-- JA & Co.'s fraudulent defense crumbles into dust, and also, Jodi Arias will have no appellate case whatsoever.
Juan Martinez has every right ot present evidence to defend the malicious allegations made against Travis Alexander because there is no evidence that he watched "porn" (of course, even if he did, so what?), and moreover, no evidence whatsoever that the State "mishandled" or "tampered" with evidence. Nurmi does not want the truth exposed to the jury.
In my opinion, JSS is incompetent, biased, and corrupt... She has violated the US Constitution by shrouding the trial proceedings in an unconstitutional cloak of secrecy, until the AZ Court of Appeals overturned her unlawful ruling, in what highly respected constitutional attorneys have considered to be an outlandish decision in letting a convicted butcher testify in secret. There are no "National Security" issues at stake in this trial... and, Jodi Arias has no right to demand undue deference over and above that which is defined by law and awarded to other convicted murderers.
Moreover, JSS has trampled asunder the AZ Victims' Bill of Rights over the past year-and-seven months, by entertaining many (not just one or two) "ex-parte" meetings with JA & Co., and excluding the prosecutor, Juan Martinez, and the Alexanders, who have a right to be present when discussing anything material affecting the tria itselfl. JSS's inappropriate, and possibly illegal "ex-parte" meetings resulted in delay after delay after delay, and unconstitutional secrecy for over a year, which is in violation of the AZ Judicial Code of Conduct, requiring prompt action in adjudicating over trial issues. Over 120 documents have been sealed; many hearings have been sealed; and, the "ex-parte" meetings have been secret. This represents a violation of the precious principles of transparency in criminal trials which is upheld by the US Supreme Court in their protection of the US Constitutional rights of the victims, and the public, as well as of the defendant.
"Porn-Gate" is fraudulent, in my opinion. And it is the judge's role to act as the gatekeeper to ensure that evidence presented into the Court, during a penalty phase, is proven to be true and properly vetted. Instead, JA & Co. have not argued a "mitigation case"-- but, they are re-trying their guilt phase, because, imo, JSS does not want the convicted murderer to get the DP. JSS simply has allowed JA & Co. to run-amok over the past year-and-seven-months, since the hung jury, in May 2013. This is not right... it's unethical.. and yes, in my opinion it is corrupt. Corrupt because a judge has an obligation to balance the rights of the defendants with the rights of the victims. JSS has failed miserably to do so... and, to-date she has shown an extraodinary bias towards the convicted murderer & her unethical defense team, which is unacceptable, imo. And, her incompetence in managing the courtroom is on-show each and every day. Corruption is derived from focusing on the demands of one side over the other. For this, JSS should be held accountable, imo.
Edie Morse "Corruption":-- "An act done with an intent to give some advantage inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others. It includes bribery, but is more comprehensive; because an act may be corruptly done, though the advantage to be derived from it be not offered by another. Merl. Rep. h.t." - Legal Definition, http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/corruption
In my opinion, the undue deference that JSS has granted to Jodi Arias is corrupt. This not not a case whereby one can chalk-up all of the many, many benefits & special favors that JSS has awarded to the convicted murderer, Jodi Arias, over the course of the past year-and-seven months, since the hung jury, in May 2013, to "mistakes". JA & Co. call Skank's brutal slaughter of Travis Alexander a "mistake" too. The abuse of the word "mistake" undermines the gravity of the infringement of the rights of the victims.
The over 120 sealed documents; the transcripts from the many sealed hearings; and, the transcripts from the myraid "ex-parte" meetings between JSS and JA & Co. need to be made public; and furthermore, imo, the AZ Commission on Judicial Conduct ought to conduct a thorough investigation into the violations of the law committed by JSS in this case in order to ascertain whether or not that she should be asked to resign. No judge in this country is above the rule of law. Not JSS of the AZ Maricopa County Superior Court, who is a publically-elected official.
Edie Morse Earlier (scroll above) I cited the legal definition of the word "corruption". Without "beating a dead horse", it might be interesting to revisit the common usage of the word "corruption" too:--
cor·rup·tion noun \kə-ˈrəp-shən\ : dishonest or illegal behavior especially by powerful people (such as government officials or police officers) ... -http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corruption
I do not believe that JSS has taken financial bribes, for example... I simply think that she has corrupted the trial proceedings in this case, and that her bias towards the convicted murderer & her unethical team, for whatever motive (e.g. fear or sympathy) and her sheer-and-utter incompetence has made a mockery of our justice system.
Recall the words of Former Federal Prosecutor & Veteran Defense Attorney, Michael Volkov, who has said:--
"Judge Stephens is a judge who has no business being a judge – an official who undermines any concept of the administration of justice. My laundry list of complaints goes on for pages and I will not take up too much space writing about all of them..."...
Continued on:-- http://www.corporatecomplianceinsights.com/the-jodi.../
And, remember too, David Bodney's, a highly respected constitutional lawyer, who warned us:--
..."... The trial court has gone from transparency to blackout and bewilderment," said attorney David Bodney, who represents several media outlets, including the Arizona Republic, fighting for transparency. "There have been repeated flagrant violations of the public's constitutional right to attend proceedings."..."...
..."... [David] Bodney says the judge has gone to the extreme, often simply locking the courtroom doors without issuing an order as to why, in violation of the U.S. Constitution. "The public is deprived of its First Amendment right to attend criminal proceedings," Bodney said. "The public has a right to be heard before they're just locked out." The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees such basic rights as freedom of speech and the press.
Even arguments by attorneys over media access to proceedings in the case have been closed to the media. An irony not lost on Bodney is that the intense media interest in the case has largely evolved from Arias' own actions by courting interviews and operating a Twitter account and selling her artwork from behind bars through a third party. She regularly posts inspirational quotes, links to purchase her drawings and solicitations for donations for her appeals..."... Source:-- http://www.usatoday.com/.../jodi-arias-trial.../3797175/
Edie Morse FYI. "Diagnosing Jodi: Dr DeMarte took the stand on February 3rd. She was explaining the various tests given to Jodi by herself and Geffner and the validity of those tests to the jury. Below is a collection of the tests given to Jodi as well as a link to explore what it means to have Borderline Personality Disorder. We hope this helps you understand this often times confusing testimony a little better." - Courtesy of JoAnn Jukes.
http://www.thegoldpatrol.com/jodi-arias.html
Edie Morse Steve Krafft @SKrafftFox10 · 25s25 seconds ago "So for you folks playing at home, we wound up today with 20 sidebar conferences."
In approx. 5 or so hours of court time (i.e. not including lunch & normal breaks), that makes for approx. a bit less than 3-4 sidebars per hour. Amusing, when Former Federal Prosecutor & Veteran Defense Attorney Michael Volkov said:--
..."... Judge Stephens lost control of the courtroom from the very beginning. She permitted the defense to request sidebars whenever they felt like it, dragging out the case, making incessant and ridiculous objections. It is a wonder that Juan Martinez still has his hair. When a judge loses control of the courtroom they undermine the very integrity of the judicial process. I have seen judges who run a tight, efficient trial and make clear their expectations of the participants. (One judge used to deny requests for a sidebar, and require the parties to stay after the jury leaves and consider them late in the evening)..."...
Source:-- http://blog.volkovlaw.com/.../the-jodi-arias-trial.../
Edie Morse Well done to Juan Martinez & Dr. Janeen DeMarte again today. They completely obliterated JA & Co.'s bogus "PTSD - Domestic Violence Victim - Foggy-Girl" scam over the past two days. Jodi Arias' many mailcious and self-serving lies have come back to haunt her... and she has finally been exposed as a dangerous sado-narcissistic psychopath-cum-murderer, without a shred of humanity. She deserves the Death Penalty, and the Alexanders deserve the peace of mind never to have to look at her again, when this nightmarish trial is over. A few highlights from today's trial proceedings:--
Courtesy of JoAnn Jukes and Shelley Shaffer:--
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"AZ Jodi is begging for one juror to make eye contact as she smiles at them. She's very smiley today #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer
"Dr. DeMarte back on the stand. Martinez asks if she believes there was physical domestic violence between #jodiarias and Travis Alexander."
Mike Watkiss @mikewatkiss3tv
"State expert Dr. DeMarte back on stand saying #jodiarias told different stories at different times to different people about abuse #3tvarias"
Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer
"#jodiarias told DeMarte that the abuse was over Alexander borrowing money but told the female shrink it was about losing a job."
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Demarte- someone who has experienced these incidents of DV wouldn't have different stories as to why it happened #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"In past interviews with psychologists Jodi says no DV abuse from her parents or verbal #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Mike Watkiss @mikewatkiss3tv
"DeMarte says #jodiarias never told her about parents' substance abuse-but JA told jurors dad used coke & mom used pot #3tvarias"
Tammy Rose @News20Chopper
"Dr. DeMarte is reading a quote from #JodiArias "Parents never physically or sexually abused me.""
Monica Lindstrom @monicalindstrom
"#JodiArias cousin spoke with Dr. Demarte who says she knew of no physical abuse in JA's house"
MaryEllen Resendez @maryellenabc15
"Pros. Witness Dr. DeMarte's intvw w/ #JodiArias cousin Aimee Lantz -- never saw abuse, not even spanked -- "kids were always spoiled"#abc15"
MaryEllen Resendez @maryellenabc15
"#JuanMartinez now asking if people said #JodiArias was secretive -- DeMarte answers "Yes" #TravisAlexander #abc15"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"DeMarte- If someone doesn't reveal their sexual relationship it doesn't mean they r manipulative. U don't have to share this info with any1"
Mike Watkiss @mikewatkiss3tv
"DeMarte says just because TA didn't go around talking about sex w/#jodiarias doesn't make him Jekyll & Hyde #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"This piece of evidence describes Jodi as being a secretive person in general #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Monica Lindstrom @monicalindstrom
"Zenya (childhood friend of JA) described #JodiArias as being secretive. Dr. D said this is a trait of borderline personality disorder"
Mike Watkiss @mikewatkiss3tv
""Unstable personality" is part of "borderline personality disorder" according to DeMarte #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer
"DeMarte: Borderlines have general instability in their life, their identity, their behavior. #jodiarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Juan- With regards to Bobby Juarez, do you know Jodi kept that relationship a secret? DeMarte- Yes #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Nurmi is objecting like crazy #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"DeMarte says Jodi had a fear of abandonment and being alone. #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Jodi engaged in behaviors to pull people toward her and how she did it pushed people away and created conflict-DeMarte #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Mike Watkiss @mikewatkiss3tv
"DeMarte says "fear of abandonment" is part of "borderline personality disorder" #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Tammy Rose @News20Chopper
"Michelle Lowry asks Travis if #JodiArias slashed his tires. He says he doesn't know but he's caught her spying on him"
Monica Lindstrom @monicalindstrom
"DD: reading other's emails and sending spies to watch people is a symptom of a fear of abandonment #JodiArias, this is very common"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Deanna told DeMarte, Jodi always showed up uninvited and Lisa also said this #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Jodi called at inappropriate times, asked advise, and Jodi would just always let herself in the house. - Billings #jodiarias #3tvaris"
Monica Lindstrom @monicalindstrom
"DD: Intrusive behaviors-example is #JodiArias taking TA's diamond ring w/out his permission - Nurmi objects incredulously"
Steve Krafft @SKrafftFox10
"Dr. DeMarte:#jodiarias "intrusive" behaviors stealing diamond ring from TA."
... Continued ...
Edie Morse ... Continued ...
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Email between Reagan and Travis- #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"TA says his ex GF got on FB. To this day she will cry louder and more intense than anything you can imagine over me. #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"I'm afraid she will kill herself-Travis #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Regan- She still stalking you? TA- Yep #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Regan- how long ago did you guys break up TA- Almost a year. I had to change my password but she figures it out #jodiarias #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"TA- Yea you will prob get a threatening email from some anonymous person & it will be her. There's a good chance this will happen #jodiarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Reagan- Thanks for the warning #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"TA- My thing kept signing off and she got my password and kept logging me off over and over. #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"She is crafty, she's scary, haven't I told you about her - Travis #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"TA- Now my ex is in my email I think. She's prob reading this...say Hi Jodi Reagan- Hi Jodi...hey we are totally gonna do it #jodiarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Travis is talking about Jodi slashing his tires and Regan better watch out #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Moving on.... Jodi Arias has kicked her mother #jodiarias #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Moving on.... Jodi Arias has kicked her mother #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Geffner gave Jodi a test 8/2011 and as it relates to anger question 59 has to do with yelling and telling people off, #jodiarias endorsed it"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Mad and angry inside...Jodi says "often" Getting angry about something trivial...Jodi says "often" #jodiarias #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Borderlines have anger inside and explode and Jodi does this. Jodi also confessed to feeling empty inside #jodiarias #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"I wanted it done, I wanted to be dead by TA's birthday-#jodiarias DeMarte says her opinion is JA has Borderline Personality Dis...not PTSD"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"DeDeMarte says #jodiarias doesn't fit the criteria for PTSD #3tvarias #sidebar"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Demarte is going over PTSD symptoms with jury She's is explaining intrusive thoughts/nightmares/flashbacks #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"DeMarte says Jodi didn't experience any of these It showed she didn't on the testing #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"#jodiarias was describing positive thoughts with her negative ones and it doesn't fit Jodi's nightmares were over the trial not the murder"
"Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Avoidance- People usually avoid the physical act of things and Jodi didn't have this symptom #jodiarias #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"The past experts say TA caused JA PTSD and Jodi wouldn't avoid him which most would do #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"#jodiarias talked about him in her journals, attended memorial, and talked to news outlets after the murder #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Jodi then went to the home of Travis Alexander after she murdered him and after the memorial. This shows she wasn't frightened #jodiarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"People with PTSD startle and scan a room a lot to feel safe...Jodi doesn't meet this #jodiarias #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"DeMarte didn't observe any of these behaviors while she interviewed her & she also watched video tapes of Jodi....she doesn't startle at all"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"She doesn't have PTSD like Geffner stated according to DeMarte... Juan is done #jodiarias #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Evening recess back at 9:45am MST #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Robyn @robyns323
"I've got a feeling #TravisAlexandis in that Maricopa County Courtroom and he's NOT LEAVING! until he gets justice. #JodiArias"
The truth about Skank's psycho-stalking; her abusiveness; her theft of Travis' property as well as his peace of mind; and, her vicious obsession with Travis Alexander to the extent that she invaded his privacy, was all revealed today. Justice 4 Travis.
Edie Morse This evening, I was thinking that Juan Martinez accomplished more on the witness stand in 2 days with Dr. Janeen DeMarte, in terms of the material covered, than JA & Co. did with the week or more that they dragged out the mind-numbingly boring & perjurious testimony given by Dr. "Guff" Geffner! The vast superiority of Juan Martinez's legal acumen & his integrity versus the clumsiness &, dishonest filibustering by Willmott & Nurmi could not be more transparent. Any other judge would have shut Willmott & Nurmi down years ago, and made them behave like respectable advocates, instead of the unscrupulous bottom-feeders which they have proven to be. JSS has allowed JA & Co. to disrupt the trial proceedings to an extent that is unacceptable, imo.
Edie Morse Jeff Gold talks about how Jodi Arias is the aggressor, not the victim... and, he describes how Dr. Janeen DeMarte has wrecked the bogus defense case which is clearly a load of rubbish:--
http://www.spreecast.com/.../the-gold-patrol-jodiarias...
Edie Morse Somebody PMed me that JSS held back some details about the "Purple Plum" incident from being exposed by Juan Martinez & Dr. DeMarte yesterday. From her info, she indicates that the restaurant owner was about to fire Skank for giving Blow-Jobs (and also, possibly soliciting for sex in exchange for cash) to other employees & customers... (during working hours?)... but, that Skank quit before she was fired, and that's when she bought her weapons (gun & knives); packed her car; and, was planning to flee to Mexico. She said that JSS likes to give "middle-of-the-road" rulings so that each side gets "something". But that's NOT justice! In a criminal trial, the Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth is supposed to be revealed... JSS is desperate to be "liked"!!!
P.S. By the way, who is "Edgar" (the man that Skank was "kissing" in the "Purple Plum")? How old was "Edgar"? There is more to the story than JSS allowed to be told in the courtroom.
Until I had more than one source provide me with this information, I did not post it... One of the sources is in Phoenix, AZ, and has proven to be right about a number of issue related to this case. I trust these individuals, and figure that the owner of the "Purple Plum" will be allowed to reveal the full truth of what took place, once the trial is over.
Why do you think that Jodi Arias was seen to whisper "Oh My God!" during the initial guilt phase, when Juan Martinez was cross-examining Alyce LaToilette about the "Purple Plum" incident, and that WIllmott ran up to the bench, and got JSS to preclude them from discussing it any further?
JSS would not permit anything to do with the "Purple Plum" incident to be exposed to the last jury. Juan Martinez was able to get "bits-and-bots" out this time around, and it's the first that we've all learnt about Skank's "kissing" of this "Edgar" at the "Purple Plum"...
... I maintain that there is far more to this story than what we've learnt to-date. Nurmi fought hard yesterday for anything to be revealed about the "Purple Plum" incident, and there was an exceptionally long sidebar... and, he is not fighting just to keep out that Skank "kissed" some guy in a restaurant. JSS restricted Deanna Reid, not allowing her to tell this jury that Travis Alexander left her his beloved Napoleon, and she would not allow Abe Abdelhadi to tell the jury that the "Mormon" Jodi Arias told him that she had "magic" in her panties... JSS restricts that which will do too much damage to her Skank, whom she does not want to get the DP.
Edie Morse FYI. "Jodi Arias: Document placed under seal".
Courtesy of Deborah J. Kamp.
http://www.courtchatter.com/.../jodi-arias-document...
Edie Morse Vis-a-vis this sealed document (scroll above), Juan Martinez should be allowed to show this nasty e-mail to this jury, in order to expose the kind of vicious, opportunistic creeps, like Marc McGee, who are willing to lie for Skank and to intimidate honest prosecution witnesses like Deanna Reid. I expect there to be a lot more nasty attacks upon the State's witnesses, because JA & Co. are really the "win at all costs" vermin. I'm sick and tired of JSS's seal-crazy mania, to protect Skank.
There is much being covered-up, e.g. the "Purple Plum" incident, which I have been informed by 2 credible sources (who are proven correct, most of the time) that not all was allowed to be revealed yesterday. Juan Martinez was ordered by JSS to keep it restricted; just as she ordered Deanna Reid not to reveal that Travis Alexander left her his beloved Napoleon, and Abe Abdelhadi who was not allowed to reveal that the "Mormon" Jodi Arias told him that she had "magic" in her panties.
JA & Co. have dredged the bottom-of-the-sewers to come up with perjurious witnesses; false "affidavits"; and, fabricated "evident" (e.g. "Porn-Gate"), and let's face facts:-- Neither Nurmi, nor Willmott have any professional ethics whatosever. I don't think that they take oaths seriously in AZ... for JSS too is allowing them to run-amok. Today, Nurmi will cast aspersions upon Dr. DeMarte, and the people whom she quoted yesterday (Travis' friend, Reagan, and Skank's Cousin Amy, for example)-- and, watch him try to destroy them both with lies concocted overnight by Skank & her Mommy Dearest. This is going to get ugly, and JSS ought to let Juan Martinez expose this fraud.
Thank you. I would be grateful for any feedback that you get hold of... My sources did not reveal from whom they obtained the info regarding the "Purple Plum"-- but imo, it is important that the Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth be exposed!
Some bloggers are already saying that it could be that the "mental illness" defense (Borderline Personality Disorder) is the mitigating factor that takes the DP "off-the-table" for the jurors-- but, everyone who commits a 1st degree premeditated murder has a "screw loose"-- and ergo, hopefully Juan Martinez will be able to argue that BPD is not debilitating, and that she made a choice, and must be held accountable.
Jodi Arias did not suffer from "mental insanity", which would have rendered her ineligible for the DP, because by law, a person suffering from schizophrenia, for example, does not know what they are doing. By contrast, Skank knew exactly what she was doing when the psycho-butcher brutally slaughtered Travis Alexander.
Edie Morse Jeffrey Evan Gold @jeffgoldesq
"#JodiArias happy any talk about metal decease which is a mitigation factor. IMHO Jodi planned, executed, and covered up becuase she is #EVIL"
The Gold Patrol™ @thegoldpatrol
"#jodiarias Nurmi saying that people are born with tendencies to certain disorders. DeMarte says that environment can awaken tendencies."
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Nurmi wants examples of Jodi not being validated? DeMarte says Jodi told her that her parents wouldn't validate her emotions #jodiarias"
My goodness gracious. How many people do not get "validation" and have their "egos" stroked constantly-- but they do not grow up to be slags taking out their frustrations by brutally slaughtering to death a lover who rejects them??? Get real!!!
Interesting that Nurmi may be hoisted by his own petard. Initially, JA & Co. argued that Skank was "normal" until after she met Travis Alexander, and that she changed for the worse, due to the trauma that they dishonestly claim that he inflicted upon her. All lies... Now, Nurmi wants to claim that Skank suffered abuse as a child, making her "mentally ill"... due to the horrendous way that she was mistreated as a child... All lies too, imo.
But, he can't have it both ways:-- Was Skank "normal" until after Travis Alexander "abused" her? Of course not... But, that's what they have tried to claim... trashing the victim. Now, they are playing their "Pity Ploy" that Skank has suffered from a "mental illness" due to abuse by her own parents... but then, why is there no evidence of any abuse? And, wouldn't BPD be insufficient cause to "excuse" her for her brutal slaughter of Travis Alexander since she was not incapacited from making decisions and taking actions.
I think that Juan Martinez needs to show that BPD did not cripple Skank from working; sexing men; travelling; being a cunning, manipulative liar; and, ultimately plotting to murder Travis Alexander, and then carrying out her vicious butchery. If every convicted murderer was "excused" for their crime on the basis of some kind of personality malfunction, nobody would get the DP
Edie Morse Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"No evidence anyone got Jodi help."
Uh-huh. Yeah right. To be frank, I think that people assume that it's easy to get somebody help; but has anybody checked the costs of obtaining psychological help for a child? It's hellishly expensive. Working parents aren't always able to get help; and there are no school reports to show that teachers or counsellors advised Skank's parents to obtain help.
Subsequently, once a young person leaves home, then what's a parent supposed to do? They can't jump in their car and kidnap her, for goodness sakes! Skank left home at the age of 16 or 17 years old. Her parents could not bind-and-gag her and force her to seek treatment. Skank is the kind of psycho-sado-narcissist who would have told then to "Go To Hell! You're Not Going To Control My Life!" if her parents had suggested to her that she seek help.
That's really disingenuously glib to say that somebody else should have sought help for Skank. Perhaps, Skank should have sought help for Skank-- except she didn't because she considers herself to be smarter than Einstein; more talented than Vincent Van Gogh; and, a "Goddess"! I didn't know that "Goddesses" accepted help from others!!!
Edie Morse Recall Kirk Nurmi calling Dr. Janeen DeMarte, "Dr. Death" this morning?
Of course, you've all heard of the Nazi doctor, Dr. Josef Mengele, called "The Angel Of Death" for his cruelty & gruesome experiments upon prisoners at the Auschwitz Death Camp. Also, there was another such War Criminal named "Aribert Ferdinand Heim, a Nazi fugitive and concentration camp doctor, [whose search] has officially come to a close, the German authorities said Friday, after they determined that the man known as Dr. Death for his unnecessary operations had died in Egypt in 1992."
Is this what Nurmi has finally stooped to? The lowest of the low. Defaming this bright, professional, and honest psychologist, Dr. Janeen DeMarte, by attempting to ruin her, with such a malicious appellation in recollection of a Nazi War Criminal. Others have been called "Dr. Death", since then, including Jack Kevorkian, who assisted terminally ill patients to end their lives. Also, Walter Birkby, a highly respected forensic anthropologist who "testified in some of the most high-profile homicide cases in Pima County and was in demand in other jurisdictions as well" was affectionately referred to as "Dr. Death".
If confronted, Nurmi would probably say that he was thinking of Mr. Birkby, and not Dr. Heim... but still... imo, Nurmi sunk to a new low today, and I hope that the jurors were not impressed with his attempt to malign Dr. Janeen DeMarte. Shame on Kirk Nurmi.. and, shame on JSS for not admonishing him for name-calling, using such highly-charged, derogatory name.
Source:-- http://www.nytimes.com/.../germany-ends-hunt-for-nazi-dr...
Nurmi would back-down and say that he was paying her a compliment, as per:-- http://tucson.com/.../article_65291ae3-bf2c-5f46-8ae0...
Edie Morse Intellectual disability is differentiated by the Courts from mental illness. The State's psychologist, Dr. Janeen DeMarte, diagnosed Skank with Borderline Personalithy Disorder (BPD), which is designated as a serious "mental illness", according to the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH).
Jodi Arias has Bordeline Personality Disorder (BPD) which is a "mental illness"-- but which is not equivalent to "mental insanity". During the initial guilt phase of the trial, from January - May 2013, JA & Co. fought against Dr. DeMarte's diagnosis of BPD... but, since that time they decide to "turn the tables" and to adopt it as a "mitigating factor", which JSS allowed them to do, because "mental illness" can be taken into account by the jury when rendering her sentence of the Death Penalty or Life; unlike her other fraudulent mitigating factors, which are without corroboration, and ergo, JSS should not have permitted, by law.
However, "mental illness" does not preclude a convicted murderer from being given the DP. In fact, most cold-blooded killers have a "screw loose". Therefore, that Skank has a "mental illness" does not mean that she does not deserve the DP. Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, Charles Manson, etc., all had some kind of "mental illness" too. "Mental illness" is not the same, from a legal standpoint, as "mental insanity", which a person does not know what they are doing.
Skank knew exactly what she was doing when she premeditated her brutal slaughter of Travis Alexander; when she butchered him to death & slit his throat, and shot him in the head; and, when she ran to sex Ryan Burns within hours of her savage murder. Skank worked; she sexed men; she travelled; etc. ... In other words, she was not incapacitated or incapable of knowing right from wrong.. i.e. she was very capable of making decisions and she clearly understood right from wrong. She simply chose to do wrong.
When a person suffers from "mental insanity", e.g. schizophrenia, then they do not know right from wrong, and they do not know what they are doing. Skank is not "mentally insane", from a legal perspective, nor from a psychological standpoint either. Therefore, Juan Martinez will be able to explain why she deserves the Death Penalty:-- i.e. that she is a remorseless killer who had a choice, but did not have any respect for the life of her victim, and furthermore, that society has the right to impose the maximum penalty upon her due to the cruelty of her murder.
However, saying all that, the fault lie not with "mental illness"-- but instead, with a judge, JSS, who is incompetent, biased, and corrupt, imo, and who has rigged the sentencing phase in order for Skank to avoid the DP. JSS has allowed JA & Co. to run-amok, whilst hamstringing Juan Martinez. JA & Co. will drag out their cross-examination of Dr. Janeen DeMarte, in order to trash her, although decent judges do not allow filibustering because it is unethical & disruptive, and instead, comptent judges order the attorney to move on when they have made their point. Juan Martinez warned JSS that she was allowing JA & Co. to retry the guilt phase (which is illegal, by the way), whilst simultaneously restricting him to a mitigation rules.
The double-standard here is appalling and unacceptable, imo. JA & Co. have not been restricted to a mitigation case, as per the law:-- but instead have been permitted to violate the law at every turn with trashing of the victim; fabricating a bogus "Porn Gate" to cast suspicion upon the State's Prosecutor, Juan Martinez; manufactuing false "affidavits"; illegally allowing the Skank to testify in "secret" in violation of the US Constitution; and, attaching herself to the "Omnibus Hearing".
Thankfully, Juan Martinez is trying to get as much on the trial record, for the sake of future appeals, but this judge's bias towards the convicted murderer makes a mockery of our justice system.
Source:-- http://www.nimh.nih.gov/.../borderline.../index.shtml
Edie Morse Back in mid-December 2014, Jeff Gold posed an interesting question when he asked:-- "Is Jodi Arias a "human"? That's a profound question that he poses because Jodi Arias is a "homo sapien", by definition. She is not humane, however. Is she "human"? What does it mean to be "human"? Is every individual who would be classified as a "homo sapien" considered to be "human"? Or, would your definition of "human" include qualities that would require being civilized too? Ted Bundy was a "human", if "human" means a "homo sapien". So was Jeffrey Dahmer. And, Charles Manson too.
The US Supreme Court has upheld the right of states to decide whether or not to sentence a citizen (i.e. a "human") to the DP. Ergo, imo, it is necessary to define what qualities that a "human" has which would render them qualified to be sentenced to the DP or to obtain mercy. According to AZ law, the DP may be found by a jury, in the event that the premeditated murder was found to include one or more aggravating factors. In this case, the aggravating factor of "cruelty" was found by the last jury, because the victim suffered agony & torment. By law, JA is eligible for the DP. But, should a jury find for the maximum penalty? What qualities would a human being need to possess to consider them to be worth sparing? Here are my thoughts:--
1.) No longer a danger to others - Jodi Arias has failed to demonstrate this quality. After she brutally slaughtered Travis Alexander, and before she was arrested, she had told her father that she was going to flee. The police found amongst her personal affects, in her car, a gun & knives. She has gotten into fights with at least one other inmate, while in Estrella jail, and is considered to be a flight risk. She has threatened the life of the prosecutor, Juan Martinez, in the event that she gets the DP. She represents a danger to those who do not pander to her whims, should she be released, and in my opinion, she would even do harm to weaker, more vulnerable inmates in Perryville prison, if and when she is ever allowed into the general prison population;
2.) Mercy to others - Jodi Arias tortured & abused animals. She beat her own brother's head with a baseball bat. She kicked her own mother. She has name-called her own sister derogatory terms, including "dumb" and "stupid". She has taunted the Alexander family by using their brother's name as a tool to sell her worthless junk-"art". She has maligned the victim with malicious lies. She has insulted the prosecutor and the police. She is vicious when she does not get her way. With the victim, Travis Alexander, she would not take "No" for an answer and leave him alone, and when she started stabbing him on June 4th, 2008, she did not stop, at any time, although he was in agony & suffering. She has no quality of mercy whatsoever. No one has ever come forward to claim that she was kind or helped anybody in need, ever; .
3.) Respect for the law & for the rights of other people - Jodi Arias has no respect for any regulations which would keep her from doing what she wants, when she wants, and without reference to the harm that she inflicts upon other human beings. We are a country that has a "love-hate" relationship with the law. We admire "outlaws" who fight against unjust laws. Murder, however, is not an unjust law:-- neither is stalking; theft; harrassment; hacking into another person's social media and/or bank account; etc. Yet, when a psychopath like Jodi Arias considers that her violations of laws makes her a "hero", because she claims that she must follow her own "voice" (which even recently, she said in a "tweet" on Twitter:-- "Sometimes, you have to break the rules around you in order to keep the rules within you"... She hasn't learnt a thing!), this demonstrates that she respects no boundaries. She has no respect for the rights of others. No civilized society can exist without laws to regulation human interaction. Jodi Arias does not accept any regulation upon her behaviour, and as such, she wantonly destroyed the life of another human being, Travis Alexander. In our society, murder is a crime-- otherwise, the strong could slaughter the weak, with impunity, in order to achieve their nefarious aims:-- e.g. steal their wealth; revenge for being rejected; and/or any other selfish purpose, that suits their whims.
There are other human qualities too, that we could establish, which would be necessary to deem a person worthy of saving or not. Mitigating factors, under the law, include age, mental illness, parental sexual abuse, etc. -- but none of these apply to JA. At the age of 18 years old, men & women in this country are sent to die in war. She was 27 years old, which is well beyond the age of knowing right from wrong:-- and, moreover, the brain is fully developed by that age. She was not mentally ill, in that she was able to work as a waitress, travel; live with numerous men; etc.-- Jodi Arias was not mentally incapacitated from making decisions. She just made disastrous decisions, and she must be held accountable for her decisions which are harmful to other people, including the worst crime that a person can inflict upon another:-- exterminating them. Jodi Arias' parents have not been shown to have sexually molested her:-- i.e. there are no police reports, no school reports, no medical reports, no neighbors or family corroboration, etc. Without some semblance of proof, however small, such allegations are not truthful; they are simply self-serving.
In other words, Jodi Arias has shown no "human" qualities that would render her worth saving, imo. In fact, she is as scary and destructive as was Ted Bundy, and furthermore, she would have become a serial-killer, imo, because she is so very arrogant in her self-aggrandizement that she thought that "No Jury Will Convict Me". She told Travis Alexander on her illegally-recorded blackmail "sex-tape" that she loved it when he treated her like a Goddess. Recall Ted Bundy's words:-- “Murder is not about lust and it's not about violence. It's about possession. When you feel the last breath of life coming out of the woman, you look into her eyes. At the point, it's being God.” ... Perhaps, it's not whether or not that Jodi Arias is "human" which is the real question at this point. Maybe, the question ought to be asked as to whether or not that we can forgive a brutal butcher who demands to be "God".
Refer to:--
(1) https://www.facebook.com/JeffreyEvanGold/posts/796804853699833
(2) https://twitter.com/JodiAnnArias/status/539324631870476289
Edie Morse It's one thing to "break the rules" for the sake of the betterment of mankind. By contrast, for Skank, it's all about violating any and all rules of decency, as well as the rule of law, in order to inflict misery upon others, whilst satiating her own sordid & squalid impulses for immediate gratification. She hasn't learnt a thing-- and is more narcissistic than ever! Ergo, this is Skank's depraved ethos:--
https://twitter.com/JodiAnnArias/status/539324631870476289
Edie Morse The AZ Media hacks who shill for the powerful AZ Defense Attorney Lobby are already starting to scapegoat the State for the length & cost of this never-ending final penalty re-trial. A recent AZ article says:--
"The Jodi Arias penalty trial has begun a fifth month with no clear end in sight. ... It's unclear how much longer the prosecution will need to reinforce what it began in October."
I think it's unclear as to how much longer that JA & Co. will "need" to reinforce what it began in May 2013! The AZ Media don't both to ask why this sentencing phase has been dragged on for so long! "It's not Juan Martinez, Stupid!" The State's prosecutor has taken less than a quarter of the time that this unethical defense team have squandered thanks to an incompetent, biased, and corrupt judge, Judge Sherry Stephens (JSS), who has allowed JA & Co. to defraud the Court with "hired gun" charlatans posing as "experts" but who have filibustered with lie after lie after lie; fraudulent "affidavits" concocted by the convicted murderer & her criminal cohorts; and, worst of all a fabricated "Porn-Gate" created to delay the trial & waste time; trash the victim, Travis Alexander; and, malign the prosecutor with perjurious allegations.
"Porn-Gate" never should have been allowed in, in the first place. Like the fake, forged pedophile letters manufactured by JA to frame Travis Alexander for non-existent pedophilia:-- it was FRAUD. JA & Co.'s entire bogus defense case is retrying the original guilt phase of the trial, in violation of the law... and, they are retrying it by defrauding the Court & the Jury. There is no evidence that Travis Alexander was even remotely interested in "porn"; and, no evidence that the State "mishandled" evidence. By contrast, there is much evidence that JA & Co. have done so-- and imo, Jodi Arias, her PI Dorian Bond, Bryan Neumeister, and, Maria "Smuggler" De La Rosa should be investigated for having concocted this dishonest scheme. Jodi Arias enjoys an "indigent" classification, although she is permitted to swindle the AZ taxpayers, all because JSS has delayed the re-trial over and over and over again for this convicted murderer!
A more experienced judge would have kept "Porn-Gate" out, in the first place... for it has been the trigger for so many delays & dishonest trashing of the victim and the prosecutor. Juan Martinez must fight this... but, what JA & Co. really want is to get to the "Omnibus Hearing" so that the DP will be taken "off-the-table", although the "Omnibus Hearing" is a pretrial hearing-- and, JA is not in any kind of "pretrial" status. Of course, by then, it may become a moot issue, because over time, jurors may drop off like flies. I think that JA & Co. are throwing stuff at Juan Martinez, which requires that Det. Smith has to try to perform more research in order to explain "Porn-Gate" fully... They have sent him on a "Wild Goose Chase", to blame Juan Martinez for the delays.
JSS and JA & Co. need to be held accountable by the public; and, all of the over 120 sealed documents; the many secret, sealed hearings, and the myriad illegal "ex-parte" meetings which triggered this undue deference by JSS towards the convicted murderer & her unethical defense team, all should be made public... and then, you will find out why this farcical, rigged re-trial has cost the AZ taxpayers so much of their hard-earned dollars!!!
Refer to:--
http://www.azcentral.com/.../12news-jodi-arias.../22796081/
Edie Morse This morning, JSS will entertain Nurmi's motion asking that Det. Smith's testimony be precluded from evidence:--
* 1/30/2015 MOT - Motion - Party (001) 2/2/2015
NOTE: MOTION TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OF MESA PD DET. SMITH FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY DISCLOSE REPORT PRIOR TO TESTIMONY
I think that this motion to ask that Det. Smith's testimony be precluded has been Nurmi's real target, and that his motion filed yesterday asking to preclude Dr. DeMarte's testimony, which he knew that JSS had to reject, was a diversionary tactic. Det. Smith can show that Neumeister lied, and that "Porn-Gate" was a fraud, imo... and, when that is "blown out of the water"-- JA & Co.'s fraudulent defense crumbles into dust, and also, Jodi Arias will have no appellate case whatsoever.
Juan Martinez has every right ot present evidence to defend the malicious allegations made against Travis Alexander because there is no evidence that he watched "porn" (of course, even if he did, so what?), and moreover, no evidence whatsoever that the State "mishandled" or "tampered" with evidence. Nurmi does not want the truth exposed to the jury.
In my opinion, JSS is incompetent, biased, and corrupt... She has violated the US Constitution by shrouding the trial proceedings in an unconstitutional cloak of secrecy, until the AZ Court of Appeals overturned her unlawful ruling, in what highly respected constitutional attorneys have considered to be an outlandish decision in letting a convicted butcher testify in secret. There are no "National Security" issues at stake in this trial... and, Jodi Arias has no right to demand undue deference over and above that which is defined by law and awarded to other convicted murderers.
Moreover, JSS has trampled asunder the AZ Victims' Bill of Rights over the past year-and-seven months, by entertaining many (not just one or two) "ex-parte" meetings with JA & Co., and excluding the prosecutor, Juan Martinez, and the Alexanders, who have a right to be present when discussing anything material affecting the tria itselfl. JSS's inappropriate, and possibly illegal "ex-parte" meetings resulted in delay after delay after delay, and unconstitutional secrecy for over a year, which is in violation of the AZ Judicial Code of Conduct, requiring prompt action in adjudicating over trial issues. Over 120 documents have been sealed; many hearings have been sealed; and, the "ex-parte" meetings have been secret. This represents a violation of the precious principles of transparency in criminal trials which is upheld by the US Supreme Court in their protection of the US Constitutional rights of the victims, and the public, as well as of the defendant.
"Porn-Gate" is fraudulent, in my opinion. And it is the judge's role to act as the gatekeeper to ensure that evidence presented into the Court, during a penalty phase, is proven to be true and properly vetted. Instead, JA & Co. have not argued a "mitigation case"-- but, they are re-trying their guilt phase, because, imo, JSS does not want the convicted murderer to get the DP. JSS simply has allowed JA & Co. to run-amok over the past year-and-seven-months, since the hung jury, in May 2013. This is not right... it's unethical.. and yes, in my opinion it is corrupt. Corrupt because a judge has an obligation to balance the rights of the defendants with the rights of the victims. JSS has failed miserably to do so... and, to-date she has shown an extraodinary bias towards the convicted murderer & her unethical defense team, which is unacceptable, imo. And, her incompetence in managing the courtroom is on-show each and every day. Corruption is derived from focusing on the demands of one side over the other. For this, JSS should be held accountable, imo.
Edie Morse "Corruption":-- "An act done with an intent to give some advantage inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others. It includes bribery, but is more comprehensive; because an act may be corruptly done, though the advantage to be derived from it be not offered by another. Merl. Rep. h.t." - Legal Definition, http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/corruption
In my opinion, the undue deference that JSS has granted to Jodi Arias is corrupt. This not not a case whereby one can chalk-up all of the many, many benefits & special favors that JSS has awarded to the convicted murderer, Jodi Arias, over the course of the past year-and-seven months, since the hung jury, in May 2013, to "mistakes". JA & Co. call Skank's brutal slaughter of Travis Alexander a "mistake" too. The abuse of the word "mistake" undermines the gravity of the infringement of the rights of the victims.
The over 120 sealed documents; the transcripts from the many sealed hearings; and, the transcripts from the myraid "ex-parte" meetings between JSS and JA & Co. need to be made public; and furthermore, imo, the AZ Commission on Judicial Conduct ought to conduct a thorough investigation into the violations of the law committed by JSS in this case in order to ascertain whether or not that she should be asked to resign. No judge in this country is above the rule of law. Not JSS of the AZ Maricopa County Superior Court, who is a publically-elected official.
Edie Morse Earlier (scroll above) I cited the legal definition of the word "corruption". Without "beating a dead horse", it might be interesting to revisit the common usage of the word "corruption" too:--
cor·rup·tion noun \kə-ˈrəp-shən\ : dishonest or illegal behavior especially by powerful people (such as government officials or police officers) ... -http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corruption
I do not believe that JSS has taken financial bribes, for example... I simply think that she has corrupted the trial proceedings in this case, and that her bias towards the convicted murderer & her unethical team, for whatever motive (e.g. fear or sympathy) and her sheer-and-utter incompetence has made a mockery of our justice system.
Recall the words of Former Federal Prosecutor & Veteran Defense Attorney, Michael Volkov, who has said:--
"Judge Stephens is a judge who has no business being a judge – an official who undermines any concept of the administration of justice. My laundry list of complaints goes on for pages and I will not take up too much space writing about all of them..."...
Continued on:-- http://www.corporatecomplianceinsights.com/the-jodi.../
And, remember too, David Bodney's, a highly respected constitutional lawyer, who warned us:--
..."... The trial court has gone from transparency to blackout and bewilderment," said attorney David Bodney, who represents several media outlets, including the Arizona Republic, fighting for transparency. "There have been repeated flagrant violations of the public's constitutional right to attend proceedings."..."...
..."... [David] Bodney says the judge has gone to the extreme, often simply locking the courtroom doors without issuing an order as to why, in violation of the U.S. Constitution. "The public is deprived of its First Amendment right to attend criminal proceedings," Bodney said. "The public has a right to be heard before they're just locked out." The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees such basic rights as freedom of speech and the press.
Even arguments by attorneys over media access to proceedings in the case have been closed to the media. An irony not lost on Bodney is that the intense media interest in the case has largely evolved from Arias' own actions by courting interviews and operating a Twitter account and selling her artwork from behind bars through a third party. She regularly posts inspirational quotes, links to purchase her drawings and solicitations for donations for her appeals..."... Source:-- http://www.usatoday.com/.../jodi-arias-trial.../3797175/
Edie Morse FYI. "Diagnosing Jodi: Dr DeMarte took the stand on February 3rd. She was explaining the various tests given to Jodi by herself and Geffner and the validity of those tests to the jury. Below is a collection of the tests given to Jodi as well as a link to explore what it means to have Borderline Personality Disorder. We hope this helps you understand this often times confusing testimony a little better." - Courtesy of JoAnn Jukes.
http://www.thegoldpatrol.com/jodi-arias.html
Dr DeMarte took the stand on February 3rd. She was explaining the various tests given to Jodi by herself...
THEGOLDPATROL.COM
Edie Morse Steve Krafft @SKrafftFox10 · 25s25 seconds ago "So for you folks playing at home, we wound up today with 20 sidebar conferences."
In approx. 5 or so hours of court time (i.e. not including lunch & normal breaks), that makes for approx. a bit less than 3-4 sidebars per hour. Amusing, when Former Federal Prosecutor & Veteran Defense Attorney Michael Volkov said:--
..."... Judge Stephens lost control of the courtroom from the very beginning. She permitted the defense to request sidebars whenever they felt like it, dragging out the case, making incessant and ridiculous objections. It is a wonder that Juan Martinez still has his hair. When a judge loses control of the courtroom they undermine the very integrity of the judicial process. I have seen judges who run a tight, efficient trial and make clear their expectations of the participants. (One judge used to deny requests for a sidebar, and require the parties to stay after the jury leaves and consider them late in the evening)..."...
Source:-- http://blog.volkovlaw.com/.../the-jodi-arias-trial.../
Edie Morse Well done to Juan Martinez & Dr. Janeen DeMarte again today. They completely obliterated JA & Co.'s bogus "PTSD - Domestic Violence Victim - Foggy-Girl" scam over the past two days. Jodi Arias' many mailcious and self-serving lies have come back to haunt her... and she has finally been exposed as a dangerous sado-narcissistic psychopath-cum-murderer, without a shred of humanity. She deserves the Death Penalty, and the Alexanders deserve the peace of mind never to have to look at her again, when this nightmarish trial is over. A few highlights from today's trial proceedings:--
Courtesy of JoAnn Jukes and Shelley Shaffer:--
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"AZ Jodi is begging for one juror to make eye contact as she smiles at them. She's very smiley today #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer
"Dr. DeMarte back on the stand. Martinez asks if she believes there was physical domestic violence between #jodiarias and Travis Alexander."
Mike Watkiss @mikewatkiss3tv
"State expert Dr. DeMarte back on stand saying #jodiarias told different stories at different times to different people about abuse #3tvarias"
Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer
"#jodiarias told DeMarte that the abuse was over Alexander borrowing money but told the female shrink it was about losing a job."
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Demarte- someone who has experienced these incidents of DV wouldn't have different stories as to why it happened #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"In past interviews with psychologists Jodi says no DV abuse from her parents or verbal #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Mike Watkiss @mikewatkiss3tv
"DeMarte says #jodiarias never told her about parents' substance abuse-but JA told jurors dad used coke & mom used pot #3tvarias"
Tammy Rose @News20Chopper
"Dr. DeMarte is reading a quote from #JodiArias "Parents never physically or sexually abused me.""
Monica Lindstrom @monicalindstrom
"#JodiArias cousin spoke with Dr. Demarte who says she knew of no physical abuse in JA's house"
MaryEllen Resendez @maryellenabc15
"Pros. Witness Dr. DeMarte's intvw w/ #JodiArias cousin Aimee Lantz -- never saw abuse, not even spanked -- "kids were always spoiled"#abc15"
MaryEllen Resendez @maryellenabc15
"#JuanMartinez now asking if people said #JodiArias was secretive -- DeMarte answers "Yes" #TravisAlexander #abc15"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"DeMarte- If someone doesn't reveal their sexual relationship it doesn't mean they r manipulative. U don't have to share this info with any1"
Mike Watkiss @mikewatkiss3tv
"DeMarte says just because TA didn't go around talking about sex w/#jodiarias doesn't make him Jekyll & Hyde #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"This piece of evidence describes Jodi as being a secretive person in general #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Monica Lindstrom @monicalindstrom
"Zenya (childhood friend of JA) described #JodiArias as being secretive. Dr. D said this is a trait of borderline personality disorder"
Mike Watkiss @mikewatkiss3tv
""Unstable personality" is part of "borderline personality disorder" according to DeMarte #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer
"DeMarte: Borderlines have general instability in their life, their identity, their behavior. #jodiarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Juan- With regards to Bobby Juarez, do you know Jodi kept that relationship a secret? DeMarte- Yes #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Nurmi is objecting like crazy #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"DeMarte says Jodi had a fear of abandonment and being alone. #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Jodi engaged in behaviors to pull people toward her and how she did it pushed people away and created conflict-DeMarte #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Mike Watkiss @mikewatkiss3tv
"DeMarte says "fear of abandonment" is part of "borderline personality disorder" #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Tammy Rose @News20Chopper
"Michelle Lowry asks Travis if #JodiArias slashed his tires. He says he doesn't know but he's caught her spying on him"
Monica Lindstrom @monicalindstrom
"DD: reading other's emails and sending spies to watch people is a symptom of a fear of abandonment #JodiArias, this is very common"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Deanna told DeMarte, Jodi always showed up uninvited and Lisa also said this #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Jodi called at inappropriate times, asked advise, and Jodi would just always let herself in the house. - Billings #jodiarias #3tvaris"
Monica Lindstrom @monicalindstrom
"DD: Intrusive behaviors-example is #JodiArias taking TA's diamond ring w/out his permission - Nurmi objects incredulously"
Steve Krafft @SKrafftFox10
"Dr. DeMarte:#jodiarias "intrusive" behaviors stealing diamond ring from TA."
... Continued ...
Edie Morse ... Continued ...
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Email between Reagan and Travis- #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"TA says his ex GF got on FB. To this day she will cry louder and more intense than anything you can imagine over me. #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"I'm afraid she will kill herself-Travis #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Regan- She still stalking you? TA- Yep #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Regan- how long ago did you guys break up TA- Almost a year. I had to change my password but she figures it out #jodiarias #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"TA- Yea you will prob get a threatening email from some anonymous person & it will be her. There's a good chance this will happen #jodiarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Reagan- Thanks for the warning #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"TA- My thing kept signing off and she got my password and kept logging me off over and over. #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"She is crafty, she's scary, haven't I told you about her - Travis #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"TA- Now my ex is in my email I think. She's prob reading this...say Hi Jodi Reagan- Hi Jodi...hey we are totally gonna do it #jodiarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Travis is talking about Jodi slashing his tires and Regan better watch out #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Moving on.... Jodi Arias has kicked her mother #jodiarias #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Moving on.... Jodi Arias has kicked her mother #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Geffner gave Jodi a test 8/2011 and as it relates to anger question 59 has to do with yelling and telling people off, #jodiarias endorsed it"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Mad and angry inside...Jodi says "often" Getting angry about something trivial...Jodi says "often" #jodiarias #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Borderlines have anger inside and explode and Jodi does this. Jodi also confessed to feeling empty inside #jodiarias #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"I wanted it done, I wanted to be dead by TA's birthday-#jodiarias DeMarte says her opinion is JA has Borderline Personality Dis...not PTSD"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"DeDeMarte says #jodiarias doesn't fit the criteria for PTSD #3tvarias #sidebar"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Demarte is going over PTSD symptoms with jury She's is explaining intrusive thoughts/nightmares/flashbacks #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"DeMarte says Jodi didn't experience any of these It showed she didn't on the testing #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"#jodiarias was describing positive thoughts with her negative ones and it doesn't fit Jodi's nightmares were over the trial not the murder"
"Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Avoidance- People usually avoid the physical act of things and Jodi didn't have this symptom #jodiarias #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"The past experts say TA caused JA PTSD and Jodi wouldn't avoid him which most would do #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"#jodiarias talked about him in her journals, attended memorial, and talked to news outlets after the murder #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"Jodi then went to the home of Travis Alexander after she murdered him and after the memorial. This shows she wasn't frightened #jodiarias"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"People with PTSD startle and scan a room a lot to feel safe...Jodi doesn't meet this #jodiarias #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"DeMarte didn't observe any of these behaviors while she interviewed her & she also watched video tapes of Jodi....she doesn't startle at all"
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"She doesn't have PTSD like Geffner stated according to DeMarte... Juan is done #jodiarias #3tvarias "
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Evening recess back at 9:45am MST #jodiarias #3tvarias"
Robyn @robyns323
"I've got a feeling #TravisAlexandis in that Maricopa County Courtroom and he's NOT LEAVING! until he gets justice. #JodiArias"
The truth about Skank's psycho-stalking; her abusiveness; her theft of Travis' property as well as his peace of mind; and, her vicious obsession with Travis Alexander to the extent that she invaded his privacy, was all revealed today. Justice 4 Travis.
Edie Morse This evening, I was thinking that Juan Martinez accomplished more on the witness stand in 2 days with Dr. Janeen DeMarte, in terms of the material covered, than JA & Co. did with the week or more that they dragged out the mind-numbingly boring & perjurious testimony given by Dr. "Guff" Geffner! The vast superiority of Juan Martinez's legal acumen & his integrity versus the clumsiness &, dishonest filibustering by Willmott & Nurmi could not be more transparent. Any other judge would have shut Willmott & Nurmi down years ago, and made them behave like respectable advocates, instead of the unscrupulous bottom-feeders which they have proven to be. JSS has allowed JA & Co. to disrupt the trial proceedings to an extent that is unacceptable, imo.
Edie Morse Jeff Gold talks about how Jodi Arias is the aggressor, not the victim... and, he describes how Dr. Janeen DeMarte has wrecked the bogus defense case which is clearly a load of rubbish:--
http://www.spreecast.com/.../the-gold-patrol-jodiarias...
Jeff Gold hosts The Gold Patrol. This week on Jodi Arias psych rebuttal case and second week on Aaron...
SPREECAST.COM
Edie Morse Somebody PMed me that JSS held back some details about the "Purple Plum" incident from being exposed by Juan Martinez & Dr. DeMarte yesterday. From her info, she indicates that the restaurant owner was about to fire Skank for giving Blow-Jobs (and also, possibly soliciting for sex in exchange for cash) to other employees & customers... (during working hours?)... but, that Skank quit before she was fired, and that's when she bought her weapons (gun & knives); packed her car; and, was planning to flee to Mexico. She said that JSS likes to give "middle-of-the-road" rulings so that each side gets "something". But that's NOT justice! In a criminal trial, the Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth is supposed to be revealed... JSS is desperate to be "liked"!!!
P.S. By the way, who is "Edgar" (the man that Skank was "kissing" in the "Purple Plum")? How old was "Edgar"? There is more to the story than JSS allowed to be told in the courtroom.
Until I had more than one source provide me with this information, I did not post it... One of the sources is in Phoenix, AZ, and has proven to be right about a number of issue related to this case. I trust these individuals, and figure that the owner of the "Purple Plum" will be allowed to reveal the full truth of what took place, once the trial is over.
Why do you think that Jodi Arias was seen to whisper "Oh My God!" during the initial guilt phase, when Juan Martinez was cross-examining Alyce LaToilette about the "Purple Plum" incident, and that WIllmott ran up to the bench, and got JSS to preclude them from discussing it any further?
JSS would not permit anything to do with the "Purple Plum" incident to be exposed to the last jury. Juan Martinez was able to get "bits-and-bots" out this time around, and it's the first that we've all learnt about Skank's "kissing" of this "Edgar" at the "Purple Plum"...
... I maintain that there is far more to this story than what we've learnt to-date. Nurmi fought hard yesterday for anything to be revealed about the "Purple Plum" incident, and there was an exceptionally long sidebar... and, he is not fighting just to keep out that Skank "kissed" some guy in a restaurant. JSS restricted Deanna Reid, not allowing her to tell this jury that Travis Alexander left her his beloved Napoleon, and she would not allow Abe Abdelhadi to tell the jury that the "Mormon" Jodi Arias told him that she had "magic" in her panties... JSS restricts that which will do too much damage to her Skank, whom she does not want to get the DP.
Edie Morse FYI. "Jodi Arias: Document placed under seal".
Courtesy of Deborah J. Kamp.
http://www.courtchatter.com/.../jodi-arias-document...
Court Chatter
COURTCHATTER.COM|BY COURT CHATTER
Edie Morse Vis-a-vis this sealed document (scroll above), Juan Martinez should be allowed to show this nasty e-mail to this jury, in order to expose the kind of vicious, opportunistic creeps, like Marc McGee, who are willing to lie for Skank and to intimidate honest prosecution witnesses like Deanna Reid. I expect there to be a lot more nasty attacks upon the State's witnesses, because JA & Co. are really the "win at all costs" vermin. I'm sick and tired of JSS's seal-crazy mania, to protect Skank.
There is much being covered-up, e.g. the "Purple Plum" incident, which I have been informed by 2 credible sources (who are proven correct, most of the time) that not all was allowed to be revealed yesterday. Juan Martinez was ordered by JSS to keep it restricted; just as she ordered Deanna Reid not to reveal that Travis Alexander left her his beloved Napoleon, and Abe Abdelhadi who was not allowed to reveal that the "Mormon" Jodi Arias told him that she had "magic" in her panties.
JA & Co. have dredged the bottom-of-the-sewers to come up with perjurious witnesses; false "affidavits"; and, fabricated "evident" (e.g. "Porn-Gate"), and let's face facts:-- Neither Nurmi, nor Willmott have any professional ethics whatosever. I don't think that they take oaths seriously in AZ... for JSS too is allowing them to run-amok. Today, Nurmi will cast aspersions upon Dr. DeMarte, and the people whom she quoted yesterday (Travis' friend, Reagan, and Skank's Cousin Amy, for example)-- and, watch him try to destroy them both with lies concocted overnight by Skank & her Mommy Dearest. This is going to get ugly, and JSS ought to let Juan Martinez expose this fraud.
Thank you. I would be grateful for any feedback that you get hold of... My sources did not reveal from whom they obtained the info regarding the "Purple Plum"-- but imo, it is important that the Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth be exposed!
Some bloggers are already saying that it could be that the "mental illness" defense (Borderline Personality Disorder) is the mitigating factor that takes the DP "off-the-table" for the jurors-- but, everyone who commits a 1st degree premeditated murder has a "screw loose"-- and ergo, hopefully Juan Martinez will be able to argue that BPD is not debilitating, and that she made a choice, and must be held accountable.
Jodi Arias did not suffer from "mental insanity", which would have rendered her ineligible for the DP, because by law, a person suffering from schizophrenia, for example, does not know what they are doing. By contrast, Skank knew exactly what she was doing when the psycho-butcher brutally slaughtered Travis Alexander.
Edie Morse Jeffrey Evan Gold @jeffgoldesq
"#JodiArias happy any talk about metal decease which is a mitigation factor. IMHO Jodi planned, executed, and covered up becuase she is #EVIL"
The Gold Patrol™ @thegoldpatrol
"#jodiarias Nurmi saying that people are born with tendencies to certain disorders. DeMarte says that environment can awaken tendencies."
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ
"Nurmi wants examples of Jodi not being validated? DeMarte says Jodi told her that her parents wouldn't validate her emotions #jodiarias"
My goodness gracious. How many people do not get "validation" and have their "egos" stroked constantly-- but they do not grow up to be slags taking out their frustrations by brutally slaughtering to death a lover who rejects them??? Get real!!!
Interesting that Nurmi may be hoisted by his own petard. Initially, JA & Co. argued that Skank was "normal" until after she met Travis Alexander, and that she changed for the worse, due to the trauma that they dishonestly claim that he inflicted upon her. All lies... Now, Nurmi wants to claim that Skank suffered abuse as a child, making her "mentally ill"... due to the horrendous way that she was mistreated as a child... All lies too, imo.
But, he can't have it both ways:-- Was Skank "normal" until after Travis Alexander "abused" her? Of course not... But, that's what they have tried to claim... trashing the victim. Now, they are playing their "Pity Ploy" that Skank has suffered from a "mental illness" due to abuse by her own parents... but then, why is there no evidence of any abuse? And, wouldn't BPD be insufficient cause to "excuse" her for her brutal slaughter of Travis Alexander since she was not incapacited from making decisions and taking actions.
I think that Juan Martinez needs to show that BPD did not cripple Skank from working; sexing men; travelling; being a cunning, manipulative liar; and, ultimately plotting to murder Travis Alexander, and then carrying out her vicious butchery. If every convicted murderer was "excused" for their crime on the basis of some kind of personality malfunction, nobody would get the DP
Edie Morse Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ ·
"No evidence anyone got Jodi help."
Uh-huh. Yeah right. To be frank, I think that people assume that it's easy to get somebody help; but has anybody checked the costs of obtaining psychological help for a child? It's hellishly expensive. Working parents aren't always able to get help; and there are no school reports to show that teachers or counsellors advised Skank's parents to obtain help.
Subsequently, once a young person leaves home, then what's a parent supposed to do? They can't jump in their car and kidnap her, for goodness sakes! Skank left home at the age of 16 or 17 years old. Her parents could not bind-and-gag her and force her to seek treatment. Skank is the kind of psycho-sado-narcissist who would have told then to "Go To Hell! You're Not Going To Control My Life!" if her parents had suggested to her that she seek help.
That's really disingenuously glib to say that somebody else should have sought help for Skank. Perhaps, Skank should have sought help for Skank-- except she didn't because she considers herself to be smarter than Einstein; more talented than Vincent Van Gogh; and, a "Goddess"! I didn't know that "Goddesses" accepted help from others!!!
Edie Morse Recall Kirk Nurmi calling Dr. Janeen DeMarte, "Dr. Death" this morning?
Of course, you've all heard of the Nazi doctor, Dr. Josef Mengele, called "The Angel Of Death" for his cruelty & gruesome experiments upon prisoners at the Auschwitz Death Camp. Also, there was another such War Criminal named "Aribert Ferdinand Heim, a Nazi fugitive and concentration camp doctor, [whose search] has officially come to a close, the German authorities said Friday, after they determined that the man known as Dr. Death for his unnecessary operations had died in Egypt in 1992."
Is this what Nurmi has finally stooped to? The lowest of the low. Defaming this bright, professional, and honest psychologist, Dr. Janeen DeMarte, by attempting to ruin her, with such a malicious appellation in recollection of a Nazi War Criminal. Others have been called "Dr. Death", since then, including Jack Kevorkian, who assisted terminally ill patients to end their lives. Also, Walter Birkby, a highly respected forensic anthropologist who "testified in some of the most high-profile homicide cases in Pima County and was in demand in other jurisdictions as well" was affectionately referred to as "Dr. Death".
If confronted, Nurmi would probably say that he was thinking of Mr. Birkby, and not Dr. Heim... but still... imo, Nurmi sunk to a new low today, and I hope that the jurors were not impressed with his attempt to malign Dr. Janeen DeMarte. Shame on Kirk Nurmi.. and, shame on JSS for not admonishing him for name-calling, using such highly-charged, derogatory name.
Source:-- http://www.nytimes.com/.../germany-ends-hunt-for-nazi-dr...
Nurmi would back-down and say that he was paying her a compliment, as per:-- http://tucson.com/.../article_65291ae3-bf2c-5f46-8ae0...
Edie Morse Intellectual disability is differentiated by the Courts from mental illness. The State's psychologist, Dr. Janeen DeMarte, diagnosed Skank with Borderline Personalithy Disorder (BPD), which is designated as a serious "mental illness", according to the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH).
Jodi Arias has Bordeline Personality Disorder (BPD) which is a "mental illness"-- but which is not equivalent to "mental insanity". During the initial guilt phase of the trial, from January - May 2013, JA & Co. fought against Dr. DeMarte's diagnosis of BPD... but, since that time they decide to "turn the tables" and to adopt it as a "mitigating factor", which JSS allowed them to do, because "mental illness" can be taken into account by the jury when rendering her sentence of the Death Penalty or Life; unlike her other fraudulent mitigating factors, which are without corroboration, and ergo, JSS should not have permitted, by law.
However, "mental illness" does not preclude a convicted murderer from being given the DP. In fact, most cold-blooded killers have a "screw loose". Therefore, that Skank has a "mental illness" does not mean that she does not deserve the DP. Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, Charles Manson, etc., all had some kind of "mental illness" too. "Mental illness" is not the same, from a legal standpoint, as "mental insanity", which a person does not know what they are doing.
Skank knew exactly what she was doing when she premeditated her brutal slaughter of Travis Alexander; when she butchered him to death & slit his throat, and shot him in the head; and, when she ran to sex Ryan Burns within hours of her savage murder. Skank worked; she sexed men; she travelled; etc. ... In other words, she was not incapacitated or incapable of knowing right from wrong.. i.e. she was very capable of making decisions and she clearly understood right from wrong. She simply chose to do wrong.
When a person suffers from "mental insanity", e.g. schizophrenia, then they do not know right from wrong, and they do not know what they are doing. Skank is not "mentally insane", from a legal perspective, nor from a psychological standpoint either. Therefore, Juan Martinez will be able to explain why she deserves the Death Penalty:-- i.e. that she is a remorseless killer who had a choice, but did not have any respect for the life of her victim, and furthermore, that society has the right to impose the maximum penalty upon her due to the cruelty of her murder.
However, saying all that, the fault lie not with "mental illness"-- but instead, with a judge, JSS, who is incompetent, biased, and corrupt, imo, and who has rigged the sentencing phase in order for Skank to avoid the DP. JSS has allowed JA & Co. to run-amok, whilst hamstringing Juan Martinez. JA & Co. will drag out their cross-examination of Dr. Janeen DeMarte, in order to trash her, although decent judges do not allow filibustering because it is unethical & disruptive, and instead, comptent judges order the attorney to move on when they have made their point. Juan Martinez warned JSS that she was allowing JA & Co. to retry the guilt phase (which is illegal, by the way), whilst simultaneously restricting him to a mitigation rules.
The double-standard here is appalling and unacceptable, imo. JA & Co. have not been restricted to a mitigation case, as per the law:-- but instead have been permitted to violate the law at every turn with trashing of the victim; fabricating a bogus "Porn Gate" to cast suspicion upon the State's Prosecutor, Juan Martinez; manufactuing false "affidavits"; illegally allowing the Skank to testify in "secret" in violation of the US Constitution; and, attaching herself to the "Omnibus Hearing".
Thankfully, Juan Martinez is trying to get as much on the trial record, for the sake of future appeals, but this judge's bias towards the convicted murderer makes a mockery of our justice system.
Source:-- http://www.nimh.nih.gov/.../borderline.../index.shtml
Edie Morse Back in mid-December 2014, Jeff Gold posed an interesting question when he asked:-- "Is Jodi Arias a "human"? That's a profound question that he poses because Jodi Arias is a "homo sapien", by definition. She is not humane, however. Is she "human"? What does it mean to be "human"? Is every individual who would be classified as a "homo sapien" considered to be "human"? Or, would your definition of "human" include qualities that would require being civilized too? Ted Bundy was a "human", if "human" means a "homo sapien". So was Jeffrey Dahmer. And, Charles Manson too.
The US Supreme Court has upheld the right of states to decide whether or not to sentence a citizen (i.e. a "human") to the DP. Ergo, imo, it is necessary to define what qualities that a "human" has which would render them qualified to be sentenced to the DP or to obtain mercy. According to AZ law, the DP may be found by a jury, in the event that the premeditated murder was found to include one or more aggravating factors. In this case, the aggravating factor of "cruelty" was found by the last jury, because the victim suffered agony & torment. By law, JA is eligible for the DP. But, should a jury find for the maximum penalty? What qualities would a human being need to possess to consider them to be worth sparing? Here are my thoughts:--
1.) No longer a danger to others - Jodi Arias has failed to demonstrate this quality. After she brutally slaughtered Travis Alexander, and before she was arrested, she had told her father that she was going to flee. The police found amongst her personal affects, in her car, a gun & knives. She has gotten into fights with at least one other inmate, while in Estrella jail, and is considered to be a flight risk. She has threatened the life of the prosecutor, Juan Martinez, in the event that she gets the DP. She represents a danger to those who do not pander to her whims, should she be released, and in my opinion, she would even do harm to weaker, more vulnerable inmates in Perryville prison, if and when she is ever allowed into the general prison population;
2.) Mercy to others - Jodi Arias tortured & abused animals. She beat her own brother's head with a baseball bat. She kicked her own mother. She has name-called her own sister derogatory terms, including "dumb" and "stupid". She has taunted the Alexander family by using their brother's name as a tool to sell her worthless junk-"art". She has maligned the victim with malicious lies. She has insulted the prosecutor and the police. She is vicious when she does not get her way. With the victim, Travis Alexander, she would not take "No" for an answer and leave him alone, and when she started stabbing him on June 4th, 2008, she did not stop, at any time, although he was in agony & suffering. She has no quality of mercy whatsoever. No one has ever come forward to claim that she was kind or helped anybody in need, ever; .
3.) Respect for the law & for the rights of other people - Jodi Arias has no respect for any regulations which would keep her from doing what she wants, when she wants, and without reference to the harm that she inflicts upon other human beings. We are a country that has a "love-hate" relationship with the law. We admire "outlaws" who fight against unjust laws. Murder, however, is not an unjust law:-- neither is stalking; theft; harrassment; hacking into another person's social media and/or bank account; etc. Yet, when a psychopath like Jodi Arias considers that her violations of laws makes her a "hero", because she claims that she must follow her own "voice" (which even recently, she said in a "tweet" on Twitter:-- "Sometimes, you have to break the rules around you in order to keep the rules within you"... She hasn't learnt a thing!), this demonstrates that she respects no boundaries. She has no respect for the rights of others. No civilized society can exist without laws to regulation human interaction. Jodi Arias does not accept any regulation upon her behaviour, and as such, she wantonly destroyed the life of another human being, Travis Alexander. In our society, murder is a crime-- otherwise, the strong could slaughter the weak, with impunity, in order to achieve their nefarious aims:-- e.g. steal their wealth; revenge for being rejected; and/or any other selfish purpose, that suits their whims.
There are other human qualities too, that we could establish, which would be necessary to deem a person worthy of saving or not. Mitigating factors, under the law, include age, mental illness, parental sexual abuse, etc. -- but none of these apply to JA. At the age of 18 years old, men & women in this country are sent to die in war. She was 27 years old, which is well beyond the age of knowing right from wrong:-- and, moreover, the brain is fully developed by that age. She was not mentally ill, in that she was able to work as a waitress, travel; live with numerous men; etc.-- Jodi Arias was not mentally incapacitated from making decisions. She just made disastrous decisions, and she must be held accountable for her decisions which are harmful to other people, including the worst crime that a person can inflict upon another:-- exterminating them. Jodi Arias' parents have not been shown to have sexually molested her:-- i.e. there are no police reports, no school reports, no medical reports, no neighbors or family corroboration, etc. Without some semblance of proof, however small, such allegations are not truthful; they are simply self-serving.
In other words, Jodi Arias has shown no "human" qualities that would render her worth saving, imo. In fact, she is as scary and destructive as was Ted Bundy, and furthermore, she would have become a serial-killer, imo, because she is so very arrogant in her self-aggrandizement that she thought that "No Jury Will Convict Me". She told Travis Alexander on her illegally-recorded blackmail "sex-tape" that she loved it when he treated her like a Goddess. Recall Ted Bundy's words:-- “Murder is not about lust and it's not about violence. It's about possession. When you feel the last breath of life coming out of the woman, you look into her eyes. At the point, it's being God.” ... Perhaps, it's not whether or not that Jodi Arias is "human" which is the real question at this point. Maybe, the question ought to be asked as to whether or not that we can forgive a brutal butcher who demands to be "God".
Refer to:--
(1) https://www.facebook.com/JeffreyEvanGold/posts/796804853699833
(2) https://twitter.com/JodiAnnArias/status/539324631870476289
Edie Morse It's one thing to "break the rules" for the sake of the betterment of mankind. By contrast, for Skank, it's all about violating any and all rules of decency, as well as the rule of law, in order to inflict misery upon others, whilst satiating her own sordid & squalid impulses for immediate gratification. She hasn't learnt a thing-- and is more narcissistic than ever! Ergo, this is Skank's depraved ethos:--
https://twitter.com/JodiAnnArias/status/539324631870476289
“"Sometimes, you have to break the rules around you in order to keep the rules within you" http://t.co/vuiqm6...
TWITTER.COM|BY JODI ARIAS UPDATES
