The Gold Patrol: #JODIarias SLAMMED

http://www.spreecast.com/events/the-gold-patrol-jodiarias-slammed

Day 37 of Jodi Arias trial: Attorney wants court watchers kicked-out By: PHOENIX (CBS5

Day 37 of Jodi Arias trial: Attorney wants court watchers kicked-out









http://www.kpho.com/story/28083340/day-37-of-jodi-arias-trial-jurors-back-in-court

Actual Texts, and judge won't let jury hear word "stole".... Credit to: JMPSP and Pastilla LaManniquin

Juan Martinez Prosecutor Support Page (Facebook)

https://www.facebook.com/JuanMartinezProsecutorSupportPage

Last Trial: The crowed outside when they announced Guilty in the First! By: Kim Lapara David

Last Trial: The crowed outside when they announced Guilty in the First!  

There are MORE women in the US than there are men.  Look at both of the photos below.  It looks like just as many men wanted ja to be found guilty as there were women.  Welp, it looks like ja and the supporters that claimed that most of the people that wanted her to be found guilty were older women that are jealous of her.  Don't fear $kank supporters...I'm sure the percentage of men and women that want her put to death for what she did to an innocent man, Travis Alexander, equals out as well.  Ha!  

Kim Lapara David

Administrator of:  

Jodi Arias is a Psychopath..NOTHING ELSE!

(Facebook Group)

https://www.facebook.com/groups/167773416715804/

How can Jodi Arias justify doing her allocution in 'open court' if she is not wiling to testify in 'open court'? By: Joey Jackson Fans Page.

Joey Jackson Fans

QUESTION: How can Jodi Arias justify doing her allocution in 'open court' if she is not wiling to testify in 'open court'?

Arias already stated in open court to Judge Stephens, before the defense rested, that she wanted to complete her testimony but that she could not do so in an open courtroom. However when she gives her allocution at the end of the defense's surrebuttal case, it will be in 'open court'.

(Legal Definition of Allocution: The direct address between the judge and the convicted defendant prior to sentencing. During the address, the judge speaks directly to the defendant and asks if the defendant has anything to add prior to hearing the sentence. The defendant then answers the judge and may say anything in an effort to lessen the severity of the sentence, such as an apology, an offering of remorse, or an explanation of the motivations that drove the defendant's criminal actions.)

It will be very interesting to see if Arias offers an apology to the family for her murdering Travis. (She hasn't so far.) Will she show ANY remorse at all again for the murder of Travis? (So far she hasn't.) Would she ever offer an explanation as to the motivations that drove her to murdering Travis as she did? The truth? We've heard so many of her reasons, I honestly don't expect her EVER be truthful! But the allocution is the time to beg for her life and give reason why she should live. And she can say anything she wants for the jurors to hear and Juan Martinez cannot cross examine her at all. HOWEVER......if Jodi introduces ANYTHING 'new' in her allocution, then Juan Martinez can have the opportunity of rebutting. Fine line to walk Ms. Arias.

Arias already stated in open court to Judge Stephens, before the defense rested, that she wanted to complete her testimony but that she could not do so in an open courtroom. However when she gives her allocution at the end of the defense's surrebuttal case, it will be in 'open court'.

(Legal Definition of Allocution: The direct address between the judge and the convicted defendant prior to sentencing. During the address, the judge speaks directly to the defendant and asks if the defendant has anything to add prior to hearing the sentence. The defendant then answers the judge and may say anything in an effort to lessen the severity of the sentence, such as an apology, an offering of remorse, or an explanation of the motivations that drove the defendant's criminal actions.)

It will be very interesting to see if Arias offers an apology to the family for her murdering Travis. (She hasn't so far.) Will she show ANY remorse at all again for the murder of Travis? (So far she hasn't.) Would she ever offer an explanation as to the motivations that drove her to murdering Travis as she did? The truth? We've heard so many of her reasons, I honestly don't expect her EVER be truthful! But the allocution is the time to beg for her life and give reason why she should live. And she can say anything she wants for the jurors to hear and to her benefit, Juan Martinez cannot cross examine her at all.

But my question to you is......if she can't testify in 'open court' and wants it all locked up in secret (nobody knows why), how is she going to be able to do her allocution in 'open court'? We're not there yet so who knows what tricks are up the sleeves of the defense? This is Jodi's LAST SHOT at the jurors before deliberations. I don't think this trial can become anymore bizarre than it already is.

But.....never say never! smile emoticon

Admin/Sharon.....

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article on the Joey Jackson Fans page are solely those of the admin/author.

But my question to you is......if she can't testify in 'open court' and wants it all locked up in secret (nobody knows why), how is she going to be able to do her allocution in 'open court'? We're not there yet so who knows what tricks are up the sleeves of the defense? This is Jodi's LAST SHOT at the jurors before deliberations. I don't think this trial can become anymore bizarre than it already is.

But.....never say never!

Admin/Sharon.....

One last thought, looking at this photo, is this the face that Jodi will greet the jurors with on that fateful day? It worked last time......what are your thoughts?

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article on the Joey Jackson Fans page are solely those of the admin/author.

CREDIT:  JOEY JACKSON FANS  (FACEBOOK)

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Joey-Jackson-Fans/485866588137167?fref=photo

DT claiming racial harassment by court watchers. Photo credits: JMPSP AND UTTUMT

The first "story" sent via internet.

@troyhaydenfox10: ‪#‎JodiArias‬ def team claiming racial harassment by court watchers including woman known as "cane lady." ‪#‎fox10phoenix‬

@troyhaydenfox10: The racial harassment reportedly aimed at a member of the #JodiArias defense team outside the courtroom. Team is taking complaint to judge.

Juan Martinez Prosecutor Support Page (Facebook)

https://www.facebook.com/JuanMartinezProsecutorSupportPage

The second "story" sent via internet.  

THE TRUTH "FINALLY" COMES OUT!!!

THE RINGTONE INCIDENT : TRIAL WATCHERS COMPLETELY INNOCENT : NEVER MEANT TO EVEN UNINTENTIONALLY JOKE ABOUT JODI ARIAS' MITIGATING SPECIALIST : The alleged ''racial insult'' at Mitigating Specialist Maria De La Rosa turns out to be anything but that.

Investigation into what happened, proved the incident to revolve around an innocent song, never meant to be directed at De La Rosa, which was sung as clarification during recess from one trial watcher to another, as they quietly discussed the issue of the ringtone which caused Judge Stephens to stare at De La Rosa when De La Rosa's ringtone inadvertently went off on a previous day.

One trial watcher innocently humming the tune to another trial watcher, was what was misconstrued, despite it being never intended for the Mitigating Specialist at all

.

Find "Understanding The Travesties of Unexpected Murder Trials" on Facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/BestNewsSiteCoveringtheAriasTrial

Arizona Supreme Court won't allow secret Jodi Arias testimony By: ASSOCIATED PRESS, | February 10, 2015 @ 9:07 pm

Arizona Supreme Court won't allow secret Jodi Arias testimony

http://ktar.com/22/1806657/Arizona-Supreme-Court-wont-allow-secret-Jodi-Arias-testimony

Nurmi continued to play games with DeMarte in courtroom...It's called "Name Calling!!!" By: Joey Jackson Fans Page

NURMI CONTINUED TO PLAY GAMES WITH DEMARTE IN COURTROOM…..IT’S CALLED ‘NAME CALLING’!!

Many times people behave so erratic, rude, obnoxious, snarky, cocky, crude and add to that….. behaving like a ‘school-yard bully’ and on top of that, you’re the defense attorney? An unethical one at that! That’s right! What a list of skills for Nurmi to add to his ‘resume’ if he’s ever looking for another job. Very impressive!

I don’t know what law courses Nurmi signed up for or who taught them but I don’t believe he stuck around long enough to get the test results of how he scored! I can tell you right now that he ‘flunked’ the course of ‘people skills’ without a doubt!

Numerous times on cross, Nurmi referred to Dr. DeMarte as ‘Dr. Death for the State.’ Even though Juan objects and gets it stricken from the record each time, it didn’t hinder Nurmi from continuing to say it several times. It didn't STOP HIM!! And the jurors continued to ‘hear’ it. Although Judge Stephens has instructed them to strike that statement, they’re all human and it’s in the back of their heads.

I was disappointed in the line of questions that the jurors asked. I didn’t expect these types of questions at all.

Jury questions:

Q: Was Jodi mentally ill prior to the murder?
DeMarte: She has Borderline Personality Disorder. That doesn't come out of the blue, it happens over time.

Q: Without having training in DAPS testing, what is your basis for believing Dr. Geffner administered it incorrectly?
DeMarte: It's a self-reporting test. Don't need extensive training in it. Any psychologist could have picked out his errors.

Q: How many tests are there to diagnose Borderline Personality Disorder and PTSD?
DeMarte: There are hundreds of tests. Some are more popular than others.

Q: How many did you personally administer?
DeMarte: I administered 4 tests: MMPI, RAP, TSI and WAIS.

Q: How many years experience do you have in treating domestic violence victims?
DeMarte: Since 2004

Q: How many years do you have in treating sexual abuse victims?
DeMarte: Since 2004

Q: Do these fields require certification?
DeMarte: Yes for a clinical psychologist. To treat PTSD or victims of domestic violence, there's no certification out there.

Q: When you were treating patients from 2004-2008, was it by yourself or with another psychologist?
DeMarte: Before licensed I practiced under the license of another psychologist but I met alone with the patient. This is standard.

Q: Do you feel that the knowledge of a sexual assault is as damaging as having a memory of it?
DeMarte: It can manifest into PTSD but you have to have the symptoms. It wouldn't be PTSD without memory.

Q: Can the body have reactions to certain stimuli that trigger feelings to suppressed memories?
DeMarte: Yes, there could be a physiological reaction.

Q: In one of the communications between Jodi and Travis, Travis says Jodi can have all of his passwords. Is that still considered unwanted intrusive behavior?
DeMarte: No, not when they exchanged information. As time went on, it was clear that Travis took away the permission.

Q: There were some communications between Travis and other women where he complained that Jodi wouldn't leave him alone. Were these people, like Michele Lowry, aware he was still seeing Jodi?
DeMarte: Not to the extent it was sexual.

Q: How long in total did Jodi work at the Purple Plum both times?
DeMarte: I would need to look at my notes.....I'm not sure.

Q: Did you monitor her at all after the four times you met with her?
DeMarte: No.

Q: How far back did your forensic evaluation go and were all the records were available?
DeMarte: All the records pertaining to her were made available to me, as far as I know. My evaluation went back to her childhood.

Q: Do you consider Borderline Personality Disorder a mental illness or a psychological disorder and why?
DeMarte: It's a psychological disorder which has the same meaning as mental illness.

Q: How does dissociation play into Borderline Personality Disorder?
DeMarte: It's a technique to distance oneself from an environment that is anxiety provoking. One of the symptoms of BPD is dissociation and paranoia.

And there were two times that stuck out in my mind…..but believe me, there were MANY where Nurmi was so unethical!!!!!!!!!! Here is one of his statements.

DeMarte: “What’s your question?”
Nurmi: “Fine!!!! You don’t understand!!! We’ll move on!”

Another one!
DeMarte: “I prefer to think……” and before she could complete her sentence….Nurmi screamed back at her!
Nurmi: SCREAMING AT HER! “Did I ask you if you ‘preferred to think’? Did I ask if you that?”

Sorry…..! Nobody has THAT right to be so hateful! At this point, I just want this trial to be over with and go away! I’ll talk to you later…..I’m taking my ‘cooling down time.' smile emoticon

Admin/Sharon.....

Juror Questions courtesy of Court Chatter.

Photos courtesy of Mark Henle.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article on the Joey Jackson Fans page are solely those of the admin/author.

CREDIT:  JOEY JACKSON FANS  (FACEBOOK)

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Joey-Jackson-Fans/485866588137167?fref=photo

ja: If at first you don't succeed...try again! However..... By: Joey Jackson Fan Page

JODI ARIAS: IF AT FIRST YOU DON'T SUCCEED.....TRY AGAIN! HOWEVER, THERE'S A CHANCE YOU MAY FAIL A SECOND TIME!

And that's exactly what happened!!! The Arizona Supreme Court ruling came in and has DENIED Jodi Arias' Petition seeking to 'reverse' the Court of Appeals decision and allow her to continue testifying in 'secret', (a sealed courtroom). In other words, the courtroom will stay open for all to attend, see and hear. They upheld the Court of Appeals decision that 'overturned' Judge Stephens' ruling that Arias could continue to testify in secret behind closed doors.

While Nurmi wasn't contented with their decision, he bumped it up and appealed it to an even higher court, the Arizona Supreme Court. After their reviewing the petition, they have released their findings and turned down Nurmi's request.

Jodi Arias stood before Judge Stephens in open court and when asked if she was going to continue to testify, she stated that she wanted to complete her testimony but under the circumstances, she just couldn't testify in an open courtroom. This was put on record before the defense rested it's case.

Arias will still have her chance to speak in a form of an allocution at the end of the defense's surrebuttal case.

But those are two huge victories for the prosecution! And the media that fought so hard to get the courtroom opened back up again. Thank you Mr. Bodney!

Admin/Sharon.....

CREDIT:  JOEY JACKSON FANS  (FACEBOOK)

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Joey-Jackson-Fans/485866588137167?fref=photo

In the Minds of Jurors, referring to DeMarte By: UTTUMT

In the Minds of Jurors, Has Dr. Janeen DeMarte's Proficiency in her Evaluation of Jodi Arias Gotten Overshadowed by the Years of Experience of her Counterparts and How Will the State Address this in the Coming Days?

Find "Understanding The Travesties of Unexpected Murder Trials" on Facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/BestNewsSiteCoveringtheAriasTrial