Pic of ja in court during the retrial of the sentencing phase.

Evil in truest form.  

Performing for the Jury.

ja's DT apparently can't teach ja to be honest.  Honesty is not a quality of ja's. What they have taught her is the proper way to  hold her hands(out in front; not to the sides; nor in the pockets), and to "control" her facial emotions(don't grin from ear to ear; don't frown; keep a straight face) when the judge enters the courtroom.  Once ja is seated, that is an entirely different story.  

I use the word "taught" because if I used to the words "asked her to and/or forced" her to control herself during the time that the Judge enters the courtroom, she'd probably file a motion against having to control herself for those brief moments.   

  

ja updates "rants of a babbling idiot"

How old is this cry baby?   

Freedom Warrior @ Twitter giving ja Hell.

Freedom Warrior...  I love it!  

ja's Twitter.

What murderer wants to go near a trial?  Much less be on trial for murder?  ja has regrets alright....she regrets being caught!  

ja Updates trying to tell Jeffrey Gold that "tween porn" is the same thing as "child porn." WRONG! Nice pic of ja's meal! lol

I agree with Jeffrey Gold.  Eigh"teen" and nine"teen" year old's are NOT children, as far as the law goes.  

There wasn't any child pornography found on TA's PC anyway.  If the person that runs ja Updates is trying to use the word of a known liar(ja) to smear his name so she can try using her lies to justify her having murdered him...it's NOT happening.  

ja should feel grateful that she's served anything to eat at all.  There's people that need it and deserve it far more than what she does.  Her victim won't ever eat again.  A lot of people DON'T care what ja "thinks" that she should be entitled to.  Seeing her recent court pics, she sure doesn't look like she's being starved by any means.       

A revolting picture that ja updates@Twitter posted for ja for MLK Day. Unbelievable that ja, a murderer, would compare herself to MLK.

The ONE person that didn't turn his back on ja was Travis Alexander.  It was ja that "tried" to silence him forever.  Thank God that Travis Alexander and his words lives on through a lot of people.

By: Understanding The Travesties of Unexpected Murder Trials.

22 HOURS AGO BY: Kim Lapara David

BISHOP PARKER TOOK THE STAND TODAY & PROVED Marc McGee LIED!!! Here are some of the transcripts. Wish we could have seen Jodi's face.
Bishop Parker says there was a computer at his house. Family never saw Travis on the computer.
Bishop's family members never saw Travis Alexander use their computer in the living room.
Juan- During time TA was living there did ever use computer? P-I didn't see him use it and no one in my family saw him use it 
Bishop discusses Witness 1 & his online relationship with a female.
Parker knew Witness #1 in 1999 and Wit #1 met a woman online. They had an online relationship
The woman traveled to Riverside to meet Witness #1
Witness 1's online girlfriend lived w/Bishop. Bishop says he would not have allowed that if another male was living there.
She came to stay late Nov/Dec 2000
MaryEllen Resendez @maryellenabc15 36s37 seconds ago
Bishop Parker witness#1's online GF also lived w/him after parents asked 4a safe place 4her 2stay 12/2000
Witness 1 would come visit girlfriend at Bishop's house & had permission to use Bishop's computer.
Alexander was not living in the house when witness 1 was there to visit the girl he thought he might marry. Witness 1 used the computer.
Witness #1 had Parker's permission to use the computer TA wasn't living there at that time
Bishop can't recall exact employment but remembers Witness 1 worked with computers.
Witness 1's girlfriend lived with Bishop until marriage. Less than 5 months.
Witness #1 was very familiar with computers according to Bishop
Parker tells jurors witness#1 knew his way around computers
Aha so it was non-witness witness #1 who had access to the Bishops PC says Bishop. Travis never seen use it by him or his family
Bishop said Witness 1 came over almost every day.

Follow The Gold Patrol: #JODIarias reBUTTED By: Jeff Gold

FINALLY, Jeff Gold at the Gold Patrol gets what JM is doing.  





Edie Morse Largely, I agree with Jeff Gold's assessment (scroll above to his Spreecast), except that imo, Judge Sherry Stephens (JSS) is not fit to sit on the bench, adjudicating over a capital murder trial:-- for she has violated the US Constitution, when she allowed the convicted murderer to testify as a "secret witness" (when there are no National Security issues at stake); and, she has violated the AZ Victims' Bill of Rights by delaying this re-trial for over a year-and-seven-months following a series of inappropriate "ex-parte" meetings (not just one or two, but many); and, she has violated the AZ Rules of Disclosure by the Defense to the State, when she did not insist that the names & addresses of these witnesses be disclosed. 

Moreover, JSS is unfit to sit on the bench due to her blatant lack of judicial impartiality; her inability to run a re-trial with even a modicum of decorum; and, her allowing JA & Co. to run amok. It is one thing for a judge to "bend over backwards" to give a defendant the right to put on a defense. It is another thing to hamstring the State and not even allow them to put on the state's case. JSS has precluded Juan Martinez from exposing the truth about Jodi Arias, a convicted murderer-- to an excessive extent, that other judges do not do:-- i.e. in the Bryan Wayne Hulsey capital murder trial, the defendant's animal abuse was cited in the penalty phase... JSS has not allowed Juan Martinez any mention of JA's animal abuse. 

Finally, it is clear to conscientious trial watchers that JSS has allowed JA & Co. to put Travis Alexander on trial. This is not a mitigaiton case-- it's an appellate case-- and that is in violation of the rules governing a final penalty re-trial. The jurors are currently being asked to determine JA's guilt; not her penalty of the DP or Life, by virtue of the incompetent, biased, and corrupt manner that JSS is adjudicating over this nightmarish farce. Farce, because even if one could stretch the imagination to rationalize that Travis Alexander should be put on trial-- not Jodi Arias-- then shouldn't both sides be heard as to his character, since he is not alive to defend himself??? Jodi Arias brutally slaughtered him to death. Instead, JSS allows JA & Co. to malign the victim with bald-faced lies; perjurious testimony; and, false "affidavits". 

Whereas, Juan Martinez is not allowed to expose that Travis Alexander was a kind and decent man (e.g. JSS wouldn't even allow Deanna Reid to say that Travis was a loving dog owner, who made provisions to leave his beloved dog, Napoleon, to her)... Why? Nothing good is being allowed in about Travis. And yet,when Juan Martinez can prove that Jodi Arias was a promiscuous slag, JSS precludes any testimony regarding Skank saying that she had "magic" in her panties, in response to Abe's comment that she was not wearing the Mormon's magic panties. Nothing about the fact that Skank convicted to Mormonism is allowed in-- which would show the hypocrisy inherent in the defense team's claim that somehow Travis Alexander & Deanne Reid were "sinful" for betraying their "vows of chastity"-- whereas, Skank banged every man who bought her a cup of coffee:-- and, ergo, Travis Alexander is portrayed in a negative light-- nothing good about him is allowed in. Skank is falsely painted as a nice, little saint-- and, nothing negative is allowed in about her.

Is this justice??? NO! It's injustice!!! JSS is an incompetent, biased, and corrupt judge-- and, although the AZ media is covering-up the "Omnibus Hearing" now postponed until May 2015-- JSS's collusion in engineering delays on behalf of the convicted murderer in order to give this brutal convicted murderer the chance to have her DP (if and when the jury is allowed to decide the matter) taken "off the table"; and thus, invalidating a potential jury decision, should they find for the DP, is wrong... it's wrong ethically, and I believe that it is wrong legally too!!!




http://www.spreecast.com/events/the-gold-patrol-jodiarias-rebutted

Update on: The Omnibus Status Conference Motion

MINUTE ENTRY 

1:33 p.m. This is the time set for Status Conference relating to the consolidated Motions to Strike the Notice of Intent to Seek Death Penalty. 

http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/012015/m6672988.pdf