BY: Edie Morse "The Sting"

Arias trial: Mesa police expert admits porn on computer

In closing arguments Thursday, Nurmi said the state should not be allowed to continue going forward with the death penalty because the case is based on testimony that's not true.

That is rich coming from Nurmi, that is representing a known LIAR.  The State's case was based on factual evidence that proved that ja planned and murdered TA.  Nurmi's defense was based on lies that came from the mouth of his client.           

"Let's put an end to this circus," he said Thursday. "Any further proceedings will be based on false evidence," he added.

If ja takes the stand then, kid you not, her testimony alone will be based on nothing more but telling more lies.  By allowing JM to finish the "retrial of the sentencing phase," the State's evidence of Murder 1, which was based on Facts, should put ja on death row.    

"This case is more about prosecutorial misconduct than it is about evidence," he said.

This case is about ja planning, murdering, and trying to cover her tracks.  What isn't relevant is the "porn" BS.  ja didn't murder TA because of any "alleged" porn fetish.

Nurmi didn't prove his case, win it, based on the lies told by his client.  IMO, just like his client, he is trying to throw other people under the bus and get off topic of the real issue here...that his client planned and murdered an innocent man.     

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/mesa/2014/12/11/jodi-arias-computer-porn-hearing-juan-martinez/20274011/

Jodi Arias trial: Testimony delayed again, coincidence or calculated move?

http://www.examiner.com/article/jodi-arias-trial-testimony-delayed-again-coincidence-or-calculated-move

Only three people have enough access to ja to do this with her artwork: Wilmott, Nurmi, and Maria.

It was told by Jason Weber and Elizabeth Schilling that Maria De La Rosa, ja's mitigation specialist, had access to their Paypal email account for awhile when they were receiving funds for ja's "Trust Fund."  Is the "Trust Fund" part of this court case?  I haven't seen where it's been brought up in this court case, inside of the courtroom, that the "Trust Fund" is part of ja's trials/case nor part of her mitigating factors.  Is Maria De La Rosa taking care of ja's finances as a side job, for free, or is she charging "The State of AZ" taxpayers?    

What does ja's finances have to do with Maria's job as a mitigation specialist in this case?  Since Maria De La Rosa has had, might still have, her hands in ja's financial status, going by statements made by Jason Weber and Elizabeth Schilling, shouldn't she have to give the financial status of all of ja's gains to the court?  The taxpayers of Arizona are paying for ja's defense.  ja is operating a business out of the Maricopa County Jail.  Why aren't her financial gains being reported to the IRS and to the court?  Surely, you'd think that any money ja is gaining from her business has to be reported to the IRS and to the court.

Who is the person behind getting ja's artwork authenticated with ja's right thumbprint?  There are ONLY three people that have enough access to ja that can get her artwork authenticated aka her right thumbprint put on it.  Someone on the DT has to be taking the "extra prints" in/out of the jail that were sold without the right thumbprint on them, to get ja to put her right thumbprint on them.  Does the State of Arizona pay for someone on a criminal's defense team to help a criminal run a business out of one of their jail???  Like I said, only three people have enough access to ja to help her run her business from jail.  If it's being done as a side job or for free, one would think that this wouldn't be allowed...illegal to say the least.  (It's considered contraband.)  That is a criminal offense!!!  

Jodi Arias trial: Porngate continues, Maria de la Rosa takes center stage

http://www.examiner.com/article/jodi-arias-trial-porngate-continues-maria-de-la-rosa-takes-center-stage

Jodi Arias trial hearing: Was Travis Alexander framed for child porn?

ja's ex speaks out about about ja.




http://www.examiner.com/article/jodi-arias-trial-hearing-was-travis-alexander-framed-for-child-porn

Is someone sneaking in photos of ja to ja or is someone(s) doing the "artwork" for ja to sell via internet?

A picture was snapped of ja while she was in court.  Shortly afterwards a drawing of ja showed up on the internet that her "Twitter" is claiming was done by ja.  These pictures are too close in comparison to deny:

1.  ja has some kind of access to pictures of herself that are being taken inside of the courtroom.  

OR

2.  Someone(s) is doing the artwork that is being sold via internet that ja is taking credit for.  

Inconvenient Truths aka Sandra Webber letting everyone know what Maria De La Rosa will or won't follow up on.

Transcript of the phone call between ja, Elizabeth, and the unknown third party.

I think that I posted this on here before.  

I wonder if the person that ja called. that made the three way. and recorded it, got their number blocked from ja being allowed to call them.  That is usually the rules when a person is in jail.  No three way calls are allowed and when caught(they had to have been caught by now), the jail blocks the inmate from being able to call that number.  

It's against the law in some State's to record a telephone conversation without a person's permission.  The proof of said recorded phone call is on the internet.    

Transcript (Page 1 of 2)
Phone call from Jodi A. Arias (Phoenix, Arizona) to Elizabeth (Lisa) Ann Schilling (Louisville, Kentucky) Date/time Thursday, September 4, 2014 at 10:38 a.m. MST (Phoenix time)
Duration ~6 minutes 

Jodi Lisa
Lisa Yes - hey Jodi
Jodi I thought you were at work. Hey, um— Lisa Well, I’m at lunch right now 

Jodi Oh, okay. Who was it that told me? Oh, Maria [Del La Rosa], she said that, um, someone had told her that you had said online last night that I was supportive of the site and I don’t want to give people that impression because I can’t support the site right now as long as you guys are collecting money. Because it should be— 

Lisa No we didn’t— 

Jodi Huh? 

Lisa No, we didn’t say you supported it. We said that you weren’t - not - you didn’t tell us to take it down which is what everyone else is saying. 

Jodi Oh. Well, I don’t mind the site being there. But what I do mind is like that Jason is collecting money and that this corporation thing and that he’s promoting it as if something that I want - because I really don’t. I want the collection of money to stay within my family. And I think that if he really did support me he would just use all that traffic and energy and momentum that he’s building and just direct it toward the Appellate Fund, which is where it should be going to begin with. And remember when you and I were like first getting together with these ideas, it was more about how we can promote the Appellate Fund. But it seems like now it’s gone in a different direction. But, I just, that’s the only — 

Lisa So if we collect money, are you saying that you don’t want it? 

Jodi Yaah. No-no-no — I’m not saying that. I’m saying that I don’t want other people outside of my family to be accepting money on my behalf. Because it takes away from the fundraising that my family is trying to do for me, for one, and for two, with the Corporation, we don’t really know where that money is ultimately going to go, because it can go wherever the board members want it to go. And, as I told Jason, for example, if you guys vote to have an ice cream party with it, then you can. And he said that’s right. But with the Appellate Fund, it’s in the trust fund and irrevocable trust so you can’t have it go anywhere else. [unintelligible] trust it 

Lisa Well, well — we’re not going to do that though. 

Jodi Well, I know. But the point is that if you wanted to you could. If you want to reward your hard work with like a trip to Vegas you know, or something. If you [unintelligible] wanna or something— 

Lisa No. I mean, but we’re not gonna do that though. And that’s why we have a board because, so, for that oversight. 

Jodi Well, I know that’s true but I was just thinking if someone were on that for example and they everyone wants to vote to like going to cruise, for example. And then one persons like, “Hey that’s not right. This money is for Jodi’s appeals. And that’s not right.” And then people are mad and then people just have to vote that person off the board and then they can do what they want with money. That’s how it works. I’m not saying that’s going to happen but the problem that when people donate to a cause they believe in then, they wanna know where the moneys gonna go. But at this point they don’t know where it’s gonna go unless they donate to the trust. It can only go to there — to [unintelligle] 

Lisa No but we have to [unintelligible] we, but we have to report our financials and where it’s going. So— Jodi Y ah.
Lisa Then I must be— 

Jodi I haven’t [unintelligible] your bylaws but they’re, you know. I dunno — I just, I don’t feel, I don’t feel right with it. I don’t feel comfortable with it. I know you guys have worked really hard on it and I’m sorry it’s gotten this far, but— 

Lisa So you don’t even want to look at the bylaws or — ? 

Jodi Well, I don’t — really haven’t seen the bylaws. I, I honestly, I don’t want to be involved with it. Because I just feel it takes away from the efforts that my other friends and family have been trying to get the fund going to try to get me an attorney. Um, you know, I just—I feel like it’s taken away from that and that’s the problem. The other thing I’m uncomfortable with is that Jason has just done this without my consent. [unintelligible] “Hey you guys, Jodi’s not quite comfortable with this yet, but we’re trying to explain [unintelligible] to understand what’s going on and we’re doing [unintelligible]. [unintelligible] on there an lies. “Jodi supports us 100%.” And I haven’t. I’ve never said that. So the fact that he just lies about that makes me not trust him, you know? It’s like if you’re going to lie about that what else are you doing, you know? And then he registered the site in my name and I never said to register my name. And he puts Perryville’s physical address on there? That, that’s just, that could get me into some, I dunno, that could potentially cause problems for me. So I know he took that off, but still, you know, it’s just, I think it’s just the fact that—I really wanted to support Jason. He has a lot of talent and everything, but I can’t. He [unintelligible] slams Pandora, he slams Maria, he slams SJ, he slams Ben, he slams Maria De La Rosa. I’m like, what? 

Lisa No, but they all slammed us first though!
Jodi I know, but, I never said [unintelligible]—
Lisa They called us thieves and liars and stealing before [unintelligible] 

Jodi [unintelligible] Well I dunno so much about what happened between him and Pandora and Maria and everything but he, he straight up just said a whole bunch of like, he dragged out records on people and humiliated them and I just, I dunno, it’s just. And then my art, like he—he doesn’t care about me. He slammed my art because he doesn’t like SJ. Like he still, like he so blinded by his dislike for SJ that he will throw my art under the bus just to get to SJ. He doesn’t care if it affects me. And he doesn’t care if affects my family and you know, their ability to travel to my trial. So, I dunno know, it’s just. I don’t — Everything says don’t trust Jason. Like, why was he so intent about having control over the money when my aunt started to — he, he coerced my aunt into giving her the password to the Paypal, giving him the password to my Paypal, which is weird, like, no one else needed that just to put it on the web site. You just need the code. But he wanted to be, he wanted more than that. Like every time he’s asking for more and more and more. And now he’s— 

Lisa No. Well, that’s what I’m talkin’ about. I’m— Yer just getting all the wrong information. He wanted the password because he [unintelligible] to put, like a banner in there so it would look professional and— 

Jodi I know, well— 

Lisa I mean, everybody’s just twistin’ everything up. 

Jodi Well, the problem though is that I told him, I told him this directly on the phone, the problem with you having that email is that now you get the email notifications and you’re not supposed to be getting them. And [unintelligible] 

Lisa Why though. 

Jodi [unintelligible] 

Lisa I know, but we fixed all that. We complied with everything you guys wanted. And then you still took it away. So, I mean, we got everything straight before you took the domain away. — — — Are you still there? 

Transcript (Page 2 of 2)
Phone call from Jodi A. Arias (Phoenix, Arizona) to Elizabeth (Lisa) Ann Schilling (Louisville, Kentucky) Date/time Thursday, September 4, 2014 at 10:38 a.m. MST (Phoenix time)
Duration ~6 minutes 

Another blogger talking about this case.

http://mycrimetime.blogspot.com